Literature DB >> 10978299

Prediction of rates of inbreeding in populations selected on best linear unbiased prediction of breeding value.

P Bijma1, J A Woolliams.   

Abstract

Predictions for the rate of inbreeding (DeltaF) in populations with discrete generations undergoing selection on best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) of breeding value were developed. Predictions were based on the concept of long-term genetic contributions using a recently established relationship between expected contributions and rates of inbreeding and a known procedure for predicting expected contributions. Expected contributions of individuals were predicted using a linear model, u(i)(()(x)()) = alpha + betas(i), where s(i) denotes the selective advantage as a deviation from the contemporaries, which was the sum of the breeding values of the individual and the breeding values of its mates. The accuracy of predictions was evaluated for a wide range of population and genetic parameters. Accurate predictions were obtained for populations of 5-20 sires. For 20-80 sires, systematic underprediction of on average 11% was found, which was shown to be related to the goodness of fit of the linear model. Using simulation, it was shown that a quadratic model would give accurate predictions for those schemes. Furthermore, it was shown that, contrary to random selection, DeltaF less than halved when the number of parents was doubled and that in specific cases DeltaF may increase with the number of dams.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10978299      PMCID: PMC1461256     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  9 in total

1.  Expected genetic contributions and their impact on gene flow and genetic gain.

Authors:  J A Woolliams; P Bijma; B Villanueva
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Predicting rates of inbreeding in populations undergoing selection.

Authors:  J A Woolliams; P Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Heritability of Threshold Characters.

Authors:  E R Dempster; I M Lerner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1950-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Selection response in finite populations.

Authors:  M Wei; A Caballero; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Prediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populations.

Authors:  N R Wray; R Thompson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Directional selection and variation in finite populations.

Authors:  P D Keightley; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased predictor of breeding value in a closed swine herd.

Authors:  G M Belonsky; B W Kennedy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Multifactorial qualitative traits: genetic analysis and prediction of recurrence risks.

Authors:  N R Mendell; R C Elston
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Effective size of populations under selection.

Authors:  E Santiago; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Selective recovery of founder genetic diversity in aquacultural broodstocks and captive, endangered fish populations.

Authors:  R W Doyle; R Perez-Enriquez; M Takagi; N Taniguchi
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 2.  Prediction and estimation of effective population size.

Authors:  J Wang; E Santiago; A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Inbreeding and pedigree analysis of the European red dairy cattle.

Authors:  Sofia Nyman; Anna M Johansson; Valentina Palucci; Anna A Schönherz; Bernt Guldbrandtsen; Dirk Hinrichs; Dirk-Jan de Koning
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-10-23       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  Evaluation of breeding strategies for polledness in dairy cattle using a newly developed simulation framework for quantitative and Mendelian traits.

Authors:  Carsten Scheper; Monika Wensch-Dorendorf; Tong Yin; Holger Dressel; Herrmann Swalve; Sven König
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Benefits of testing in both bio-secure and production environments in genomic selection breeding programs for commercial broiler chicken.

Authors:  Thinh T Chu; Setegn W Alemu; Elise Norberg; Anders C Sørensen; John Henshall; Rachel Hawken; Just Jensen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Indirect genetic effects and inbreeding: consequences of BLUP selection for socially affected traits on rate of inbreeding.

Authors:  Hooi Ling Khaw; Raul W Ponzoni; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Assessing the impact of genomic selection against hip dysplasia in the Labrador Retriever dog.

Authors:  E Sánchez-Molano; J A Woolliams; S C Blott; P Wiener
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.380

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.