Literature DB >> 33971841

Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey of women in Switzerland.

Stephan Oelhafen1, Manuel Trachsel2,3, Settimio Monteverde2,4, Luigi Raio5, Eva Cignacco Müller6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In many countries, the increase in facility births is accompanied by a high rate of obstetric interventions. Lower birthrates or elevated risk factors such as women's higher age at childbirth and an increased need for control and security cannot entirely explain this rise in obstetric interventions. Another possible factor is that women are coerced to agree to interventions, but the prevalence of coercive interventions in Switzerland is unknown.
METHODS: In a nationwide cross-sectional online survey, we assessed the prevalence of informal coercion during childbirth, women's satisfaction with childbirth, and the prevalence of women at risk of postpartum depression. Women aged 18 years or older who had given birth in Switzerland within the previous 12 months were recruited online through Facebook ads or through various offline channels. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the risk ratios associated with multiple individual and contextual factors.
RESULTS: In total, 6054 women completed the questionnaire (a dropout rate of 16.2%). An estimated 26.7% of women experienced some form of informal coercion during childbirth. As compared to vaginal delivery, cesarean section (CS) and instrumental vaginal birth were associated with an increased risk of informal coercion (planned CS risk ratio [RR]: 1.52, 95% confidence interval [1.18,1.96]; unplanned CS RR: 1.92 [1.61,2.28]; emergency CS RR: 2.10 [1.71,2.58]; instrumental vaginal birth RR: 2.17 [1.85,2.55]). Additionally, migrant women (RR: 1.45 [1.26,1.66]) and women for whom a self-determined vaginal birth was more important (RR: 1.15 [1.06,1.24]) more often reported informal coercion. Emergency cesarean section (RR: 1.32 [1.08,1.62]), being transferred to hospital (RR: 1.33 [1.11,1.60]), and experiencing informal coercion (RR: 1.35 [1.19,1.54]) were all associated with a higher risk of postpartum depression. Finally, women who had a non-instrumental vaginal birth reported higher satisfaction with childbirth while women who experienced informal coercion reported lower satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: One in four women experience informal coercion during childbirth, and this experience is associated with a higher risk of postpartum depression and lower satisfaction with childbirth. To prevent traumatic after-effects, health care professionals should make every effort to prevent informal coercion and to ensure sensitive aftercare for all new mothers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abuse; Childbirth; Coercion; Disrespect; Informal coercion; Mistreatment; Mode of delivery; Survey; Switzerland

Year:  2021        PMID: 33971841     DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03826-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth        ISSN: 1471-2393            Impact factor:   3.007


  35 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based practice and its application to childbirth care for low-risk women.

Authors:  J P Rooks
Journal:  J Nurse Midwifery       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

2.  What characterizes women who want to give birth as naturally as possible without painkillers or intervention?

Authors:  Tone Kringeland; Anne Kjersti Daltveit; Anders Møller
Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc       Date:  2009-11-27

3.  Informal coercion in psychiatry: a focus group study of attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals in ten countries.

Authors:  Emanuele Valenti; Ciara Banks; Alfredo Calcedo-Barba; Cécile M Bensimon; Karin-Maria Hoffmann; Veikko Pelto-Piri; Tanja Jurin; Octavio Márquez Mendoza; Adrian P Mundt; Jorun Rugkåsa; Jacopo Tubini; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 4. 

Authors:  Matthias Jäger
Journal:  Praxis (Bern 1994)       Date:  2017-01

5.  Stemming the global caesarean section epidemic.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Lisbet S Lundsberg; Kathleen Belanger; Christian M Pettker; Edmund F Funai; Jessica L Illuzzi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  The Canadian maternity experiences survey: an overview of findings.

Authors:  Beverley Chalmers; Susie Dzakpasu; Maureen Heaman; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2008-03

Review 8.  Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.

Authors:  Ties Boerma; Carine Ronsmans; Dessalegn Y Melesse; Aluisio J D Barros; Fernando C Barros; Liang Juan; Ann-Beth Moller; Lale Say; Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor; Mu Yi; Dácio de Lyra Rabello Neto; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide.

Authors:  Suellen Miller; Edgardo Abalos; Monica Chamillard; Agustin Ciapponi; Daniela Colaci; Daniel Comandé; Virginia Diaz; Stacie Geller; Claudia Hanson; Ana Langer; Victoria Manuelli; Kathryn Millar; Imran Morhason-Bello; Cynthia Pileggi Castro; Vicky Nogueira Pileggi; Nuriya Robinson; Michelle Skaer; João Paulo Souza; Joshua P Vogel; Fernando Althabe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review.

Authors:  Soo Downe; Kenneth Finlayson; Olufemi T Oladapo; Mercedes Bonet; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Correction to: Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey of women in Switzerland.

Authors:  Stephan Oelhafen; Manuel Trachsel; Settimio Monteverde; Luigi Raio; Eva Cignacco
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Persuasion or coercion? An empirical ethics analysis about the use of influence strategies in mental health community care.

Authors:  Emanuele Valenti; Domenico Giacco
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 2.908

3.  'We felt like part of a production system': A qualitative study on women's experiences of mistreatment during childbirth in Switzerland.

Authors:  Stephanie Meyer; Eva Cignacco; Settimio Monteverde; Manuel Trachsel; Luigi Raio; Stephan Oelhafen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.