Literature DB >> 33967572

Making Choices: DNA Replication Fork Recovery Mechanisms.

Christine M Kondratick1, M Todd Washington1,2, Maria Spies1,2.   

Abstract

DNA replication is laden with obstacles that slow, stall, collapse, and break DNA replication forks. At each obstacle, there is a decision to be made whether to bypass the lesion, repair or restart the damaged fork, or to protect stalled forks from further demise. Each "decision" draws upon multitude of proteins participating in various mechanisms that allow repair and restart of replication forks. Specific functions for many of these proteins have been described and an understanding of how they come together in supporting replication forks is starting to emerge. Many questions, however, remain regarding selection of the mechanisms that enable faithful genome duplication and how "normal" intermediates in these mechanisms are sometimes funneled into "rogue" processes that destabilize the genome and lead to cancer, cell death, and emergence of chemotherapeutic resistance. In this review we will discuss molecular mechanisms of DNA damage bypass and replication fork protection and repair. We will specifically focus on the key players that define which mechanism is employed including: PCNA and its control by posttranslational modifications, translesion synthesis DNA polymerases, molecular motors that catalyze reversal of stalled replication forks, proteins that antagonize fork reversal and protect reversed forks from nucleolytic degradation, and the machinery of homologous recombination that helps to reestablish broken forks. We will also discuss risks to genome integrity inherent in each of these mechanisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA2; DNA replication; HLTF; PCNA; RAD51; RAD52; RPA; SHPRH; SMARCAL1; ZRANB3; genome stability; replication fork protection; replication fork reversal; template switching; translesion synthesis; translesion synthesis DNA polymerases

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33967572      PMCID: PMC8098667          DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol        ISSN: 1084-9521            Impact factor:   7.499


  174 in total

Review 1.  Functions of SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, and HLTF in maintaining genome stability.

Authors:  Lisa A Poole; David Cortez
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 8.250

2.  EZH2 promotes degradation of stalled replication forks by recruiting MUS81 through histone H3 trimethylation.

Authors:  Beatrice Rondinelli; Ewa Gogola; Hatice Yücel; Alexandra A Duarte; Marieke van de Ven; Roxanne van der Sluijs; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Jos Jonkers; Raphaël Ceccaldi; Sven Rottenberg; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Mms2-Ubc13-dependent and -independent roles of Rad5 ubiquitin ligase in postreplication repair and translesion DNA synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Venkateswarlu Gangavarapu; Lajos Haracska; Ildiko Unk; Robert E Johnson; Satya Prakash; Louise Prakash
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Rad5 coordinates translesion DNA synthesis pathway by recognizing specific DNA structures in saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Qifu Fan; Xin Xu; Xi Zhao; Qian Wang; Wei Xiao; Ying Guo; Yu V Fu
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 5.  Role of yeast Rad5 and its human orthologs, HLTF and SHPRH in DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Ildiko Unk; Ildikó Hajdú; András Blastyák; Lajos Haracska
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-01-21

6.  Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells.

Authors:  Sofija Mijic; Ralph Zellweger; Nagaraja Chappidi; Matteo Berti; Kurt Jacobs; Karun Mutreja; Sebastian Ursich; Arnab Ray Chaudhuri; Andre Nussenzweig; Pavel Janscak; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Single-molecule sorting reveals how ubiquitylation affects substrate recognition and activities of FBH1 helicase.

Authors:  Tokiha Masuda-Ozawa; Trish Hoang; Yeon-Soo Seo; Lin-Feng Chen; Maria Spies
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  FBH1 promotes DNA double-strand breakage and apoptosis in response to DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Yeon-Tae Jeong; Mario Rossi; Lukas Cermak; Anita Saraf; Laurence Florens; Michael P Washburn; Patrick Sung; Carl L Schildkraut; Carl Schildkraut; Michele Pagano
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 9.  Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability.

Authors:  John Atkinson; Peter McGlynn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Structure and mechanism of B-family DNA polymerase ζ specialized for translesion DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Mykhailo Kopylov; Yacob Gomez-Llorente; Rinku Jain; Radhika Malik; Robert E Johnson; Louise Prakash; Satya Prakash; Iban Ubarretxena-Belandia; Aneel K Aggarwal
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  6 in total

1.  Banp regulates DNA damage response and chromosome segregation during the cell cycle in zebrafish retina.

Authors:  Swathy Babu; Yuki Takeuchi; Ichiro Masai
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 2.  Post-Translational Modifications of PCNA: Guiding for the Best DNA Damage Tolerance Choice.

Authors:  Gemma Bellí; Neus Colomina; Laia Castells-Roca; Neus P Lorite
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  The TIP60-ATM axis regulates replication fork stability in BRCA-deficient cells.

Authors:  Emily M Schleicher; Ashna Dhoonmoon; Lindsey M Jackson; Jude B Khatib; Claudia M Nicolae; George-Lucian Moldovan
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 4.  RAD52: Paradigm of Synthetic Lethality and New Developments.

Authors:  Matthew J Rossi; Sarah F DiDomenico; Mikir Patel; Alexander V Mazin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 5.  RIF1 Links Replication Timing with Fork Reactivation and DNA Double-Strand Break Repair.

Authors:  Janusz Blasiak; Joanna Szczepańska; Anna Sobczuk; Michal Fila; Elzbieta Pawlowska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  MYC-Induced Replicative Stress: A Double-Edged Sword for Cancer Development and Treatment.

Authors:  Laura Curti; Stefano Campaner
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.