Literature DB >> 29035360

EZH2 promotes degradation of stalled replication forks by recruiting MUS81 through histone H3 trimethylation.

Beatrice Rondinelli1,2, Ewa Gogola3, Hatice Yücel1, Alexandra A Duarte3, Marieke van de Ven4, Roxanne van der Sluijs1,5, Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos2,6, Jos Jonkers3, Raphaël Ceccaldi1,2, Sven Rottenberg3,7, Alan D D'Andrea1,2.   

Abstract

The emergence of resistance to poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) poses a threat to the treatment of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2)-deficient tumours. Stabilization of stalled DNA replication forks is a recently identified PARPi-resistance mechanism that promotes genomic stability in BRCA1/2-deficient cancers. Dissecting the molecular pathways controlling genomic stability at stalled forks is critical. Here we show that EZH2 localizes at stalled forks where it methylates Lys27 on histone 3 (H3K27me3), mediating recruitment of the MUS81 nuclease. Low EZH2 levels reduce H3K27 methylation, prevent MUS81 recruitment at stalled forks and cause fork stabilization. As a consequence, loss of function of the EZH2/MUS81 axis promotes PARPi resistance in BRCA2-deficient cells. Accordingly, low EZH2 or MUS81 expression levels predict chemoresistance and poor outcome in patients with BRCA2-mutated tumours. Moreover, inhibition of Ezh2 in a murine Brca2-/- breast tumour model is associated with acquired PARPi resistance. Our findings identify EZH2 as a critical regulator of genomic stability at stalled forks that couples histone modifications to nuclease recruitment. Our data identify EZH2 expression as a biomarker of BRCA2-deficient tumour response to chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29035360     DOI: 10.1038/ncb3626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Cell Biol        ISSN: 1465-7392            Impact factor:   28.824


  40 in total

Review 1.  Pathways of mammalian replication fork restart.

Authors:  Eva Petermann; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Chromatin assembly controls replication fork stability.

Authors:  Marta Clemente-Ruiz; Félix Prado
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  A rapid and efficient method to purify proteins at replication forks under native conditions.

Authors:  Kai Him Thomas Leung; Mohamed Abou El Hassan; Rod Bremner
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.993

4.  Synergistic tumor suppressor activity of BRCA2 and p53 in a conditional mouse model for breast cancer.

Authors:  J Jonkers; R Meuwissen; H van der Gulden; H Peterse; M van der Valk; A Berns
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Sae2 promotes DNA damage resistance by removing the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex from DNA and attenuating Rad53 signaling.

Authors:  Huan Chen; Roberto A Donnianni; Naofumi Handa; Sarah K Deng; Julyun Oh; Leonid A Timashev; Stephen C Kowalczykowski; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair.

Authors:  Eva Petermann; Manuel Luís Orta; Natalia Issaeva; Niklas Schultz; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Human RPA phosphorylation by ATR stimulates DNA synthesis and prevents ssDNA accumulation during DNA-replication stress.

Authors:  Vitaly M Vassin; Rachel William Anantha; Elena Sokolova; Shlomo Kanner; James A Borowiec
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 8.  Targeting EZH2 in cancer.

Authors:  Kimberly H Kim; Charles W M Roberts
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Nascent chromatin capture proteomics determines chromatin dynamics during DNA replication and identifies unknown fork components.

Authors:  Constance Alabert; Jimi-Carlo Bukowski-Wills; Sung-Bau Lee; Georg Kustatscher; Kyosuke Nakamura; Flavia de Lima Alves; Patrice Menard; Jakob Mejlvang; Juri Rappsilber; Anja Groth
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 10.  Mechanisms of resistance to therapies targeting BRCA-mutant cancers.

Authors:  Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  117 in total

Review 1.  A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage.

Authors:  Darshil R Patel; Robert S Weiss
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.407

2.  PARPi focus the spotlight on replication fork protection in cancer.

Authors:  Katharina Schlacher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Prediction of DNA Repair Inhibitor Response in Short-Term Patient-Derived Ovarian Cancer Organoids.

Authors:  Sarah J Hill; Brennan Decker; Emma A Roberts; Neil S Horowitz; Michael G Muto; Michael J Worley; Colleen M Feltmate; Marisa R Nucci; Elizabeth M Swisher; Huy Nguyen; Chunyu Yang; Ryuji Morizane; Bose S Kochupurakkal; Khanh T Do; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Joyce F Liu; Joseph V Bonventre; Ursula A Matulonis; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Ross S Berkowitz; Christopher P Crum; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 39.397

4.  USP1 Is Required for Replication Fork Protection in BRCA1-Deficient Tumors.

Authors:  Kah Suan Lim; Heng Li; Emma A Roberts; Emily F Gaudiano; Connor Clairmont; Larissa Alina Sambel; Karthikeyan Ponnienselvan; Jessica C Liu; Chunyu Yang; David Kozono; Kalindi Parmar; Timur Yusufzai; Ning Zheng; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  The CHK1 Inhibitor Prexasertib Exhibits Monotherapy Activity in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Models and Sensitizes to PARP Inhibition.

Authors:  Kalindi Parmar; Bose S Kochupurakkal; Jean-Bernard Lazaro; Zhigang C Wang; Sangeetha Palakurthi; Paul T Kirschmeier; Chunyu Yang; Larissa A Sambel; Anniina Färkkilä; Elizaveta Reznichenko; Hunter D Reavis; Connor E Dunn; Lee Zou; Khanh T Do; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Ursula A Matulonis; Joyce F Liu; Alan D D'Andrea; Geoffrey I Shapiro
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Proteolytic control of genome integrity at the replication fork.

Authors:  Julie Rageul; Alexandra S Weinheimer; Jennifer J Park; Hyungjin Kim
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-10

7.  RAD51 paralogs promote genomic integrity and chemoresistance in cancer by facilitating homologous recombination.

Authors:  Janelle Louise Harris; Andrea Rabellino; Kum Kum Khanna
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-12

8.  SETD1A Methyltransferase Is Physically and Functionally Linked to the DNA Damage Repair Protein RAD18.

Authors:  Manal Alsulami; Nayla Munawar; Eugene Dillon; Giorgio Oliviero; Kieran Wynne; Mona Alsolami; Catherine Moss; Peadar Ó Gaora; Fergal O'Meara; David Cotter; Gerard Cagney
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  DYNLL1 binds to MRE11 to limit DNA end resection in BRCA1-deficient cells.

Authors:  Yizhou Joseph He; Khyati Meghani; Marie-Christine Caron; Chunyu Yang; Daryl A Ronato; Jie Bian; Anchal Sharma; Jessica Moore; Joshi Niraj; Alexandre Detappe; John G Doench; Gaelle Legube; David E Root; Alan D D'Andrea; Pascal Drané; Subhajyoti De; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Jean-Yves Masson; Dipanjan Chowdhury
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Maternal Embryonic Leucine Zipper Kinase (MELK), a Potential Therapeutic Target for Neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Alexandre Chlenski; Chanyoung Park; Marija Dobratic; Helen R Salwen; Brian Budke; Jae-Hyun Park; Ryan Miller; Mark A Applebaum; Emma Wilkinson; Yusuke Nakamura; Philip P Connell; Susan L Cohn
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 6.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.