| Literature DB >> 33963253 |
Sergey A Tyganov1, Ekaterina Mochalova2, Svetlana Belova2, Kristina Sharlo2, Sergey Rozhkov2, Vitaliy Kalashnikov2, Olga Turtikova2, Timur Mirzoev2, Boris Shenkman2.
Abstract
Both research conducted under microgravity conditions and ground-based space analog studies have shown that air pump-based plantar mechanical stimulation (PMS) of cutaneous mechanoreceptors of the sole of the foot is able to increase neuromuscular activity in the musculature of the lower limbs. This type of stimulation is able to attenuate unloading-induced skeletal muscle atrophy and impaired muscle function. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of PMS on anabolic signaling pathways in rat soleus muscle following 7-day hindlimb suspension (HS) and to elucidate if the effects of PMS on anabolic processes would be NO-dependent. The soles of the feet were stimulated with a frequency of 1-s inflation/1-s deflation with a total of 20 min followed by 10 min rest. This cycle was repeated for 4 h each day. We observed a decrease in the soleus muscle mass after 7-day HS, which was not prevented by PMS. We also observed a decrease in slow-type fiber cross-sectional area (CSA) by 56%, which significantly exceeded a decrease (-22%) in fast-type fiber CSA. PMS prevented a reduction in slow-twitch fiber CSA, but had no effect on fast-twitch fiber CSA. PMS prevented a 63% decrease in protein synthesis after 7-day HS as well as changes in several key anabolic signaling regulators, such as p70S6k, 4E-BP1, GSK3β, eEF-2, p90RSK. PMS also prevented a decrease in the markers of translational capacity (18S and 28S rRNA, c-myc, 45S pre-rRNA). Some effects of PMS on anabolic signaling were altered due to NO-synthase inhibitor (L-NAME) administration. Thus, PMS is able to partially prevent atrophic processes in rat soleus muscle during 7-day HS, affecting slow-type muscle fibers. This effect is mediated by alterations in anabolic signaling pathways and may depend on NO-synthase activity.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33963253 PMCID: PMC8105341 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89362-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A) Schematic image of the “boot” for plantar stimulation of the rat soles. (B) Tail-suspended rat with attached “boot”.
Primers used for RT-qPCR.
| Gene description | Primer sequence |
|---|---|
5′-TTGATGGGGATGACCCTGAC-3' 5′-CTCGCCCAAATCCTGTACCT-3' | |
5′-GTACCCTTCCTCTTCCCTATGC-3' 5′-CAATGCCAACTCTCGTCAACAG-3' | |
5′-GTCCCCAAACAAGCACAACAGG-3' 5′-GGCTTCAGCAACATCCCACTCA-3' | |
5′-TGGGGCAGCTTTATGACAAC-3' 5′-TAGCACCAAACGGGAAAACC-3' |
Body weight and soleus muscle weight of experimental animals.
| Group | Body weight before HS, g | Body weight, g | Soleus weight, mg | Body weight/soleus weight, mg/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 209.4 ± 8.3 | 221.7 ± 2.8 | 98.1 ± 2.7 | 0.44 ± 0.011 | |
| 204.4 ± 7.5 | 196.1 ± 5.2* | 66.5 ± 2.7* | 0.34 ± 0.013* | |
| 219.6 ± 3.3 | 217.4 ± 4.2 | 71.3 ± 2.4* | 0.33 ± 0.014* | |
| 206.9 ± 7.1 | 197.7 ± 6.5* | 64.1 ± 4.5* | 0.33 ± 0.013* |
Values are means ± SE. n, number of rats; C, vivarium control group; 7HS, hindlimb suspension for 7 days; PMS, hindlimb suspension for 7 days + plantar mechanical stimulation; LN, hindlimb suspension for 7 days + plantar mechanical stimulation + L-NAME injection.
*Significant difference from C.
Figure 2(A) Cross-sectional area of slow-type and fast-type fibres in the soleus muscle. (B) Representative images showing soleus muscle fibres expressing MyHC I and MyHC II. I—fibres expressing MyHC I; II—fibres expressing MyHC II. Control group (C); 7-days hindlimb-suspended group (7HS); 7-days hindlimb suspended group with plantar mechanical stimulation (PMS); 7-day hindlimb suspended group with plantar mechanical stimulation + L-NAME injection (PMS + LN). Data shown as % of control group. *Significant difference from control group for MyHC I. #Significant difference from control group for MyHC II. $Significant difference from 7HS (p < 0.05). Blue and red dots correspond to the number of samples. The cross-sectional area of slow-type and fast-type fibres was analyzed using ImageJ 1.52a software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij).
Figure 3(A) Quantification of protein synthesis level. (B) Quantification of phospho-AKT (Ser473)/total AKT ratio. (C) Quantification of phospho-IRS-1 (Ser639)/total IRS-1 ratio. (D) Quantification of phospho-p70S6k (Thr389)/total p70S6k ratio. Control group (C); 7-days hindlimb-suspended group (7HS). 7-days hindlimb suspended group with plantar mechanical stimulation (PMS); 7-day hindlimb suspended group with plantar mechanical stimulation + L-NAME injection (PMS + LN). Data shown as % of control group. *Significant difference from control group. #Significant difference from PMS. $Significant difference from 7HS (p < 0.05). Blue dots correspond to the number of samples. The quantification of the proteins was performed using Image Studio Digits 4.0.21 software (https://www.licor.com/bio/image-studio/).
Figure 4(A) Quantification of phospho-4E-BP1 (Thr37/46)/total 4E-BP1 ratio. (B) Quantification of phospho-p90RSK (Ser380)/total p90RSK ratio. (C) Quantification of phospho-GSK-3β (Ser9)/total GSK-3β ratio. (D) Quantification of phospho-eEF2 (Thr56)/total eEF2 ratio. 7-days hindlimb suspended group with plantar mechanical stimulation (PMS); 7-day hindlimb suspended group with plantar mechanical stimulation + L-NAME injection (PMS + LN). Data shown as % of control group. *Significant difference from control group. #Significant difference from PMS. $Significant difference from 7HS (p < 0.05). Blue dots correspond to the number of samples. The quantification of the proteins was performed using Image Studio Digits 4.0.21 software (https://www.licor.com/bio/image-studio/).
Figure 5(A) eEF2 mRNA content. (B) 18S rRNA content. (C) 28S rRNA content. (D) 45S pre-rRNA content. (E) c-myc mRNA content. Control group (C); 7-days hindlimb-suspended group (7HS); 7-days hindlimb suspended group with plantar mechanical stimulation (PMS); 7-day hindlimb suspended group with plantar mechanical stimulation + L-NAME injection (PMS + LN). Data shown as % of control group. *Significant difference from control group. #Significant difference from PMS. $Significant difference from 7HS (p < 0.05). Blue dots correspond to the number of samples.