| Literature DB >> 33961066 |
M K Zebis1, P Aagaard2, L L Andersen3,4, P Hölmich5, M B Clausen6, M Brandt3, R S Husted7,8, H B Lauridsen9, D J Curtis10, J Bencke11.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify modifiable biomechanical and neuromuscular anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk factors for first-time ACL injury in adolescent female elite football and team handball players.Entities:
Keywords: ACL; Biomechanics; Electromyography; Female; Football; Handball; Screening
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33961066 PMCID: PMC9007777 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06595-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ISSN: 0942-2056 Impact factor: 4.342
Fig. 1Surface electromyography (EMG) electrode placements of the quadriceps (anterior—right) and hamstring muscles (posterior—right). VL vastus lateralis, VM vastus medialis, ST semitendinosus, BF biceps femoris, REF reference electrode
Fig. 2Muscle activity (% of max EMG) recorded during side-cutting. VL vastus lateralis, ST semitendinosus. Red line represents a player who subsequently sustained an ACL injury. Blue line represents a player who did not sustain an ACL injury in the study period. The black dotted line represents initial contact (IC)
The relative risk estimates (RR) in relation to clinically meaningful units
| Per 0.1 units increase | Per 1 unit increase | Per 10 units increase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kinematics | |||
| Knee flexion angle at IC (°) | X | ||
| Hip flexion angle at IC (°) | X | ||
| Knee adduction angle at IC (°) | X | ||
| Knee internal rotation angle at IC (°) | X | ||
| Kinetics | |||
| Knee flexion moment (Nm/kg BW) | X | ||
| Hip flexion moment (Nm/kg BW) | X | ||
| Knee adduction moment (Nm/kg BW) | X | ||
| Hip internal rotation moment (Nm/kg BW) | X | ||
| Isometric muscle strength | |||
| Knee flexion MVC (N/kg BW) | X | ||
| Hip extension MVC (N/kg BW) | X | ||
| Hip abduction MVC (N/kg BW) | X | ||
| Hip external rotation MVC (N/kg BW) | X | ||
| EMG pre-activity | |||
| Vastus lateralis (% of max EMG) | X | ||
| Vastus medialis (% of max EMG) | X | ||
| Biceps femoris (% of max EMG) | X | ||
| Semitendinosus (% of max EMG) | X | ||
IC initial contact, MVC maximal isometric voluntary contraction, N Newton, BW body weight, EMG electromyography
Fig. 3Flow diagram of included/excluded players. ACL anterior cruciate ligament
Baseline characteristics of all participants (n = 90), uninjured players (n = 81) and subsequently ACL injured players (n = 9)
| Overall ( | Uninjured ( | ACL injured ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | |||
| Age, years | 16.9 (1.2) | 16.9 (1.2) | 16.7 (1.3) |
| Height, cm | 172 (7) | 172 (7) | 176 (5) |
| Weight, kg | 66 (8) | 66 (8) | 69 (8) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22 (2) | 22 (2) | 22 (2) |
| Sport (handball:football) | 54:36 | 48:33 | 6:3 |
| Experience (years) | 10 (2) | 10 (2) | 9 (2) |
| Kinematics | |||
| Knee flexion angle at IC (°) | 25 (8) | 26 (8) | 21 (9) |
| Hip flexion angle at IC (°) | 47 (10) | 48 (10) | 43 (6) |
| Knee adduction angle at IC (°) | 1 (3) | 1 (3) | 1 (3) |
| Knee internal rotation angle at IC (°) | − 3 (6) | − 3 (5) | 4 (10) |
| Kinetics | |||
| Knee flexion moment (Nm/kg BW) | 3.1 (0.5) | 3.1 (0.5) | 3.1 (0.5) |
| Hip flexion moment (Nm/kg BW) | 3.8 (1.1) | 3.8 (1.1) | 3.9 (1.3) |
| Knee adduction moment (Nm/kg BW) | − 0.7 (0.5) | − 0.7 (0.4) | − 1.0 (0.7) |
| Hip internal rotation moment (Nm/kg BW) | 0.3 (0.2) | 0.3 (0.2) | 0.4 (0.2) |
| Isometric muscle strength | |||
| Knee flexion MVC (N/kg BW) | 4.0 (0.6) | 4.0 (0.6) | 4.0 (0.6) |
| Hip extension MVC (N/kg BW) | 3.7 (0.5) | 3.7 (0.6) | 3.8 (0.4) |
| Hip abduction MVC (N/kg BW) | 2.6 (0.4) | 2.6 (0.4) | 2.4 (0.3) |
| Hip external rotation MVC (N/kg BW) | 2.2 (0.3) | 2.3 (0.3) | 2.0 (0.1) |
| EMG pre-activity | |||
| Vastus lateralis (% of max EMG) | 33 (21) | 34 (21) | 27 (16) |
| Vastus medialis (% of max EMG) | 38 (24) | 39 (24) | 28 (17) |
| Biceps femoris (% of max EMG) | 32 (17) | 33 (17) | 24 (16) |
| Semitendinosus (% of max EMG) | 46 (22) | 48 (23) | 32 (11) |
Baseline characteristics are given as mean (SD)
IC initial contact, MVC maximal isometric voluntary contraction, N Newton, BW body weight, EMG electromyography
Risk factor candidates for ACL injury assessed during side-cutting (joint angles, joint moments, and EMG activation) and in lower limb strength testing (MVC)
| RR (95% CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted | Adjusted for sport | |||
| Knee flexion angle at IC (°)§ | 0.47 (0.16–1.35) | 0.159 | 0.43 (0.13–1.45) | n.s. |
| Hip flexion angle at IC (°)§ | 0.61 (0.39–0.99) | 0.032 | 0.56 (0.34–0.92) | 0.021 |
| Knee adduction angle at IC (°)# | 0.97 (0.76–1.23) | 0.804 | 0.97 (0.77–1.24) | n.s. |
| Knee internal rotation angle at IC (°)# | 1.12 (1.07–1.18) | < 0.001 | 1.13 (1.08–1.19) | < 0.001 |
| Knee flexion moment (Nm/kg BW)* | 1.01 (0.90–1.13) | 0.878 | 1.00 (0.89–1.14) | n.s. |
| Hip flexion moment (Nm/kg BW)* | 1.01 (0.96–1.07) | 0.652 | 1.01 (0.96–1.07) | n.s. |
| Knee adduction moment (Nm/kg BW)* | 0.90 (0.81–1.00) | 0.050 | 0.90 (0.80–1.00) | n.s. |
| Hip internal rotation moment (Nm/kg BW)* | 1.14 (0.77–1.69) | 0.509 | 1.15 (0.77–1.73) | n.s. |
| Knee flexion MVC (N/kg BW)* | 1.00 (0.89–1.12) | 0.928 | 1.00 (0.88–1.13) | n.s. |
| Hip extension MVC (N/kg BW)* | 1.03 (0.94–1.12) | 0.558 | 1.04 (0.93–1.15) | n.s. |
| Hip abduction MVC (N/kg BW)* | 0.89 (0.76–1.05) | 0.161 | 0.89 (0.75–1.06) | n.s. |
| Hip external rotation MVC (N/kg BW)* | 0.77 (0.68–0.89) | < 0.0001 | 0.77 (0.66–0.89) | 0.001 |
| Vastus lateralis (% of max EMG)§ | 0.84 (0.60–1.19) | 0.332 | 0.85 (0.63–1.16) | n.s. |
| Vastus medialis (% of max EMG)§ | 0.79 (0.57–1.09) | 0.149 | 0.79 (0.56–1.11) | n.s. |
| Biceps femoris (% of max EMG)§ | 0.68 (0.37–1.23) | 0.196 | 0.67 (0.36–1.23) | n.s. |
| Semitendinosus (% of max EMG)§ | 0.65 (0.50–0.86) | 0.002 | 0.62 (0.43–0.89) | 0.010 |
Results from Poisson regression analyses
IC initial contact, MVC maximal isometric voluntary contraction, N Newton, BW body weight, EMG electromyography, RR relative risk, CI confidence interval, n.s. non-significant
*RR represents per 0.1 unit increase in outcome measure
#RR value represents per 1 increase in outcome measure
§RR value represents per 10 unit increase in outcome measure