Evangelos Pappas1, Elizabeth J Nightingale2, Milena Simic2, Kevin R Ford3, Timothy E Hewett4, Gregory D Myer5. 1. Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center of Ioannina, School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece. 2. Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina, USA Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Division of Sports Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Division of Sports Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Departments of Physiology & Cell Biology, Orthopaedic Surgery, Family Medicine and Biomedical Engineering OSU Sports Medicine, The Sports Health & Performance Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 5. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Division of Sports Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Departments of Physiology & Cell Biology, Orthopaedic Surgery, Family Medicine and Biomedical Engineering OSU Sports Medicine, The Sports Health & Performance Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA The Micheli Center for Sports Injury Prevention, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Some injury prevention programmes aim to reduce the risk of ACL rupture. Although the most common athletic task leading to ACL rupture is cutting, there is currently no consensus on how injury prevention programmes influence cutting task biomechanics. To systematically review and synthesise the scientific literature regarding the influence of injury prevention programme exercises on cutting task biomechanics. DESIGN: The three largest databases (Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL) were searched for studies that investigated the effect of injury prevention programmes on cutting task biomechanics. When possible meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Across all studies, a total of 100 participants received exercises that are part of ACL injury prevention programmes and 76 participants served in control groups. Most studies evaluated variables associated with the quadriceps dominance theory. The meta-analysis revealed decreased lateral hamstrings electromyography activity (p ≤ 0.05) while single studies revealed decreased quadriceps and increased medial hamstrings activity and decreased peak knee flexion moment. Findings from single studies reported that ACL injury prevention exercises reduce neuromuscular deficits (knee valgus moment, lateral trunk leaning) associated with the ligament and trunk dominance theories, respectively. The programmes we analysed appear most effective when they emphasise individualised biomechanical technique correction and target postpubertal women. CONCLUSIONS: The exercises used in injury prevention programmes have the potential to improve cutting task biomechanics by ameliorating neuromuscular deficits linked to ACL rupture, especially when they emphasise individualised biomechanical technique correction and target postpubertal female athletes. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVE: Some injury prevention programmes aim to reduce the risk of ACL rupture. Although the most common athletic task leading to ACL rupture is cutting, there is currently no consensus on how injury prevention programmes influence cutting task biomechanics. To systematically review and synthesise the scientific literature regarding the influence of injury prevention programme exercises on cutting task biomechanics. DESIGN: The three largest databases (Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL) were searched for studies that investigated the effect of injury prevention programmes on cutting task biomechanics. When possible meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Across all studies, a total of 100 participants received exercises that are part of ACL injury prevention programmes and 76 participants served in control groups. Most studies evaluated variables associated with the quadriceps dominance theory. The meta-analysis revealed decreased lateral hamstrings electromyography activity (p ≤ 0.05) while single studies revealed decreased quadriceps and increased medial hamstrings activity and decreased peak knee flexion moment. Findings from single studies reported that ACL injury prevention exercises reduce neuromuscular deficits (knee valgus moment, lateral trunk leaning) associated with the ligament and trunk dominance theories, respectively. The programmes we analysed appear most effective when they emphasise individualised biomechanical technique correction and target postpubertal women. CONCLUSIONS: The exercises used in injury prevention programmes have the potential to improve cutting task biomechanics by ameliorating neuromuscular deficits linked to ACL rupture, especially when they emphasise individualised biomechanical technique correction and target postpubertal female athletes. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Scott Bonnette; Christopher A DiCesare; Adam W Kiefer; Michael A Riley; Kim D Barber Foss; Staci Thomas; Jed A Diekfuss; Gregory D Myer Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Thiago Jambo Alves Lopes; Milena Simic; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett; Evangelos Pappas Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Jeffrey B Taylor; Kevin R Ford; Randy J Schmitz; Scott E Ross; Terry A Ackerman; Sandra J Shultz Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: M K Zebis; P Aagaard; L L Andersen; P Hölmich; M B Clausen; M Brandt; R S Husted; H B Lauridsen; D J Curtis; J Bencke Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Oliver Faude; Roland Rössler; Erich J Petushek; Ralf Roth; Lukas Zahner; Lars Donath Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 4.566