| Literature DB >> 33956828 |
Mathias Koffi Ahoutou1,2, Rosine Yao Djeha1, Eric Kouamé Yao1, Catherine Quiblier3,4, Julie Niamen-Ebrottié5, Sahima Hamlaoui3, Kevin Tambosco6, Jean-Louis Perrin7, Marc Troussellier8, Cécile Bernard3, Luc Seguis7, Marc Bouvy8, Jacques Pédron6, Felix Koffi Konan2, Jean-François Humbert6, Julien Kalpy Coulibaly1.
Abstract
The supply of drinking water is a vital challenge for the people who live on the African continent, as this continent is experiencing strong demographic growth and therefore increasing water demands. To meet these needs, surface water resources are becoming increasingly mobilized because underground resources are not always available or have already been overexploited. This situation is the case in the region of Abidjan in the Ivory Coast, where the drinking water deficit is a growing problem and it is therefore necessary to mobilize new water resources to ensure the supply of drinking water. Among the potential resources, local managers have identified a freshwater lagoon, Lagoon Aghien, That is in close proximity to the city of Abidjan. With the aim of enhancing knowledge on the ecological functioning of the lagoon and contributing to the assessment of its ability to provide drinking water, several physical and chemical parameters of the water and the phytoplankton community of the lagoon were monitored for 17 months (December 2016-April 2018) at six sampling stations. Our findings show that the lagoon is eutrophic, as evidenced by the high concentrations of total phosphorus (>140 μg L-1), nitrogen (1.36 mg L-1) and average chlorophyll-a (26 to 167 μg L-1) concentrations. The phytoplankton community in the lagoon is dominated by genera typical of eutrophic environments including mixotrophic genera such as Peridinium and by cyanobacteria such as Cylindrospermopsis/Raphidiopsis, Microcystis and Dolichospermum that can potentially produce cyanotoxins. The two rainfall peaks that occur in June and October appeared to be major events in terms of nutrient flows entering the lagoon, and the dynamics of these flows are complex. Significant differences were also found in the nutrient concentrations and to a lesser extent in the phytoplankton communities among the different stations, especially during the rainfall peaks. Overall, these results reveal that the quality of the lagoon's water is already severely degraded, and this degradation could increase in future years due to increasing urbanization in the watershed. These results therefore raise questions about the potential use of the lagoon as a source of drinking water if measures are not taken very quickly to protect this lagoon from increasing eutrophication and other pollution sources.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33956828 PMCID: PMC8101731 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Locations of Lagoon Aghien and the six sampling stations (S1 to S6).
The main villages located close to the lagoon are indicated with triangles.
Monthly average values (± standard deviations) of the chemical and physical variables measured at the six sampling stations in Lagoon Aghien.
| TN | Ammonia | Nitrite | Nitrate | TP | SRP | TN/TP | Turbidity | Rainfall | Water | Chl-a | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.73 ±0.5 | 0.46 ±0.15 | 0.05 ±0.00 | 0.38 ±0.08 | 0.15 ±0.01 | 0.07 ±0.02 | 11±3 | ND | 98 | ND | ND | |
| 2.18 ±0.9 | 0.11 ±0.12 | 0.03 ±0.01 | 0.29 ±0.08 | 0.15 ±0.01 | 0.08 ±0.01 | 14±6 | 7.24±2.4 | 19 | 30.2±0.3 | 127±37 | |
| 2.06 ±0.6 | 0.07 ±0.03 | 0.08 ±0.01 | 0.41 ±0.02 | 0.16 ±0.02 | 0.08 ±0.07 | 13±3 | 10.34±4.2 | 54 | 31.0±0.6 | 167±84 | |
| 1.36 ±0.4 | 0.08 ±0.02 | 0.08 ±0.01 | 0.43 ±0.05 | 0.16 ±0.01 | 0.08 ±0.03 | 8±2 | 13.20±6.9 | 28 | 31.6±0.8 | 129±62 | |
| 1.58 ±0.5 | 0.09 ±0.02 | 0.07 ±0.01 | 0.40 ±0.09 | 0.17 ±0.01 | 0.12 ±0.02 | 9±2 | 24.8±21.0 | 136 | 31.3±0.4 | 86±24 | |
| 1.73 ±0.3 | 0.09 ±0.02 | 0.08 ±0.03 | 0.40 ±0.04 | 0.26 ±0.08 | 0.06 ±0.01 | 7±2 | 121.7±103.5 | 104 | 29.8±0.3 | 89±10 | |
| 2.94 ±0.3 | 0.19 ±0.04 | 0.06 ±0.01 | 0.66 ±0.07 | 0.56 ±0.36 | 0.12 ±0.05 | 8±7 | 85.2±32.4 | 566 | 28.0±0.2 | 43±19 | |
| 1.52 ±0.4 | 0.23 ±0.10 | 0.05 ±0.00 | 1.03 ±0.15 | 0.16 ±0.03 | 0.08 ±0.01 | 10±2 | 198.0±239.3 | 150 | 26.4±0.3 | 26±12 | |
| 1.59 ±0.4 | 0.12 ±0.05 | 0.05 ±0.00 | 1.06 ±0.31 | 0.21 ±0.08 | 0.08 ±0.01 | 9±4 | 38.4±8.9 | 72 | 26.3±0.2 | 66±38 | |
| 2.00 ±0.6 | 0.05 ±0.04 | 0.04 ±0.00 | 0.51 ±0.05 | 0.23 ±0.06 | 0.07 ±0.01 | 10±5 | 109.0±154.2 | 115 | 28.1±0.7 | 48±12 | |
| 2.62 ±0.3 | 0.09 ±0.02 | 0.04 ±0.00 | 0.47 ±0.11 | 0.47 ±0.30 | 0.12 ±0.02 | 8±5 | 29.1±11.4 | 386 | 29.6±0.8 | 61±28 | |
| 1.91 ±0.1 | 0.07 ±0.03 | 0.04 ±0.00 | 0.57 ±0.23 | 0.16 ±0.01 | 0.08 ±0.07 | 12±2 | 24.2±17.0 | 213 | 29.6±1.7 | 35±9 | |
| 1.52 ±0.5 | 0.07 ±0.05 | 0.04 ±0.00 | 0.44 ±0.04 | 0.14 ±0.01 | 0.04 ±0.02 | 11±4 | 28.5±27.1 | 54 | 28.4±0.6 | 32±11 | |
| 2.05 ±0.6 | 0.05 ±0.03 | 0.05 ±0.00 | 0.49 ±0.10 | 0.15 ±0.02 | 0.07 ±0.04 | 14±3 | 12.1±8.6 | 35 | 29.6±0.8 | 42±23 | |
| 1.91 ±0.2 | 0.08 ±0.02 | 0.05 ±0.00 | 0.53 ±0.06 | 0.22 ±0.04 | 0.08 ±0.01 | 9±1 | 14.1±4.8 | 75 | 29.7±0.7 | 59±13 | |
| 1.56 ±0.5 | 0.03 ±0.02 | 0.01 ±0.00 | 0.32 ±0.06 | 0.22 ±0.04 | 0.05 ±0.01 | 7±2 | 13.8±7.3 | 148 | 30.7±0.8 | 46±17 | |
| 1.80 ±0.3 | 0.09 ±0.02 | 0.05 ±0.02 | 0.51 ±0.16 | 0.36 ±0.18 | 0.10 ±0.03 | 7±4 | 22.1±15.0 | 89 | 30.8±0.3 | 43±17 |
TN = total nitrogen; TP = total phosphorus; SRP = soluble reactive phosphorus; Chl-a = chlorophyll-a
Fig 2Spatiotemporal variations in the total biovolumes of the phytoplankton community and in the nutrient concentrations obtained during the monitoring of Lagoon Aghien.
Only the sampling points located on the transect (S1, S2, S4, S5, and S6) are displayed in this figure. S1, S2, S4, S5, and S6 indicate the sampling stations; Biovolumes represents the phytoplankton biovolumes; TN represents total nitrogen; TP indicates total phosphorus; and N/P represents the TN/TP ratio. The red dotted rectangles correspond to the two rainfall peaks.
Fig 3Monthly variations in the average biovolumes of the five main phytoplankton groups during the monitoring of Lagoon Aghien (A) and the average relative contributions of the five main phytoplankton groups to the total phytoplankton biovolume (B).
Functional classification of the dominant genera in the phytoplankton community of Lagoon Aghien.
| Phytoplankton genera | Functionnal | Habitat templates | Tolerances | Source of energy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LO | Deep and shallow, oligo to eutrophic, | Segregated nutrients | Mixotrophic | |
| SN | Warm mixed environments | Light-, nitrogen- | Phototrophic | |
| J | Shallow, warm mixed, enriched systems | Phototrophic | ||
| - | Phototrophic | |||
| - | Phototrophic | |||
| Mild light and carbon deficiency | ||||
| P | Eutrophic epilimnia | |||
| W2 | Meso-eutrophic shallow lakes and ponds | Mixotrophic | ||
| S1 | Turbid mixed environements, | Highly light deficiency | Phototrophic | |
| M | Mixed layer of eutrophic to hypertrophic lakes at low latitudes | Hight insolation | Phototrophic | |
| H1/H2 | Mesotrophic to eutrophic shallow lakes | Low nitrogen and carbon | Phototrophic | |
| W1 | Ponds, even temporary, rich in organic | High BOD | Mixotrophic | |
| - | Phototrophic |
* Not possible to assign a functional group at the genus level
Fig 4Variations in the average monthly ß-diversity values at the six sampling stations during the 17-month monitoring period.
The blue bar indicates the turnover component of the ß-diversity; the orange bar represents the nestedness component of the ß-diversity; and the black line indicates the standard deviation around the monthly average value of the total ß-diversity.
Fig 5Canonical correspondence analysis was performed on the measured physical and chemical variable values and on the biovolumes of the 10 dominant genera in the phytoplankton community during the monitoring of Lagoon Aghien from January 2017 to April 2018.
Cylindrosp. = Cylindrospermopsis; Microc. = Microcystis; Pediast. = Pediastrum; Staura. = Staurastrum; Dolichosp. = Dolichospermum; and Perid. = Peridinium. SRP = soluble reactive phosphorus; TN = total nitrogen; TP = total phosphorus; NH4 = ammonium; NO2 = nitrite; NO3 = nitrate; Turb. = turbidity; Temp. = water temperature. Significance of the symbols: Square symbol = station 1; circle = station 2; diamond = station 3; triangle = station 4; “x” = Station 5; “+” = station 6. Colors of the symbols: Jan 2017 = blue gray; Feb 17 = gray 2; Mar 17 = dark blue; Apr 17 = green; May 17 = gold; Jun 17 = blue; Jul 17 = light green; Aug 17 = brown; Sep 17 = white; Oct 17 = black; Nov 17 = red; Dec 17 = orange; Jan 18 = light blue; Feb 18 = gray 3; Mar 18 = yellow; Apr 18 = gray 1.