| Literature DB >> 33955626 |
Abstract
Many sexual-asexual complexes show a distinct pattern where the asexuals have larger and more northerly ranges than closely related sexuals. A prime candidate to explain this so-called "geographical parthenogenesis" is ecological niche divergence between the sexuals and asexuals. Modern niche modelling techniques allow testing niche divergence by directly comparing the niches of sexuals and asexuals. In this study, I use such techniques to perform range-wide tests of whether nine bioclimatic variables, including annual mean temperature and annual precipitation, contribute to geographical parthenogenesis in two dandelion taxa: Taraxacum section Ruderalia and Taraxacum section Erythrosperma, which are both comprised of sexual diploids and asexual triploids. For both sections, I found evidence of niche divergence, though the exact nature of this divergence was different for the two sections. In section Ruderalia, the sexuals preferred warmer and wetter conditions, whereas in section Erythrosperma, the sexuals preferred dryer conditions. Using Species Distribution Modelling, consistent differences between the sexuals and asexuals were found when looking at the niche determinants: the variables that are most important for modelling the distribution. Furthermore, and in contrast with theoretical expectations that predict that the sexuals should have a wider niche, in section Erythrosperma the asexuals were found to have a wider niche than the sexuals. In conclusion, differences in niche optima, niche determinants, and niche width all contribute to the pattern of geographical parthenogenesis of these two dandelion taxa. However, the results also indicate that the exact causation of geographical parthenogenesis is not uniform across taxa.Entities:
Keywords: Taraxacum sect. Erythrosperma; Taraxacum sect. Ruderalia; apomixis; evolution of sex; polyploidy; species distribution modelling
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33955626 PMCID: PMC8362108 DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Evol Biol ISSN: 1010-061X Impact factor: 2.411
Overview of sources of all records included in the datasets for sexual diploids and asexual triploids for the two studied Taraxacum sections
| Section | Reference | Remarks | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calame and Felber ( | 8 | 3 | Using Google Earth | |
| Den Nijs and Sterk ( | 72 | 79 | Using Google Earth | |
| Den Nijs and Sterk ( | 38 | 212 | Using geonames.org and Google Earth | |
| Den Nijs and Sterk ( | 110 | 136 | Using geonames.org and Google Earth | |
| Den Nijs et al. ( | 46 | 125 | Using geonames.org and Google Earth | |
| Elzinga et al. ( | 10 | 10 | Using Google Earth | |
| Jenniskens et al., | 2 | 4 | Using Google Earth | |
| P. G. Meirmans, unpub. | 36 | 49 | Populations sampled between 1999–2005 | |
| Meirmans et al. ( | 6 | 5 | Made a selection of widely dispersed sites | |
| Paule et al. ( | 27 | 227 | Online database: | |
| Preite et al. ( | 0 | 10 | Coordinates from paper | |
| Richards ( | 0 | 12 | Using Google Earth, excluded idiosyncratic diploid in northern England | |
| Roetman et al. ( | 9 | 156 | Using Google Earth | |
| K. J. F. Verhoeven, unpub. | 1 | 1 | Population from Hedel, NL | |
| Verhoeven and Biere ( | 8 | 13 | Coordinates from paper | |
| Wilschut et al. ( | 0 | 10 | Coordinates from paper | |
|
|
|
| ||
| Den Nijs and Sterk ( | 0 | 45 | Using Google Earth | |
| Den Nijs and Van der Hulst ( | 28 | 90 | Using Google Earth, also on locations from the Figure; excluded idiosyncratic diploid in northern England | |
| Den Nijs et al. ( | 0 | 2 | Selected two widely dispersed sites | |
| Dudas et al. ( | 10 | 5 | Coordinates from paper | |
| Majeský et al. ( | 0 | 99 | Coordinates from paper | |
| P.G. Meirmans, unpub. | 0 | 1 | Population sampled between 1999–2005 | |
| Paule et al. ( | 0 | 43 | Online database: | |
| Štěpánek and Kirschner ( | 0 | 46 | Only used locations for which coordinates were given | |
| Suvada et al. ( | 34 | 32 | Coordinates from paper | |
| Van Oostrum et al. ( | 0 | 10 | Using Google Earth | |
| Vasut ( | 80 | 108 | Using geonames.org | |
| Vasut and Majeský ( | 0 | 19 | Using Google earth and coordinates from paper | |
| Vasut et al. ( | 0 | 19 | did not use all locations from Czech republic as the number of points there is already high | |
| Wolanin and Musiał ( | 0 | 11 | Coordinates from paper | |
|
|
|
|
Most of the data come from the primary literature, but some come from online data repositories and from personal collections. Here, every record is a unique combination of location and ploidy.
FIGURE 1Maps showing the distribution of records of sexual diploid (yellow circles) and asexual triploid dandelions (blue squares) for Taraxacum section Ruderalia (a) and section Erythrosperma (b). Records come from various sources, but primarily from scientific literature on the cytogeography of dandelions (see Table 1)
FIGURE 2Niche divergence between diploid sexual and asexual triploid dandelions of sections Ruderalia and Erythrosperma, tested using the method of Broennimann et al. (2011). Plots a and d show the results of a multivariate analyses where the divergence was tested on the first two axes of a PCA performed on nine bioclimatic variables (see also Figure S1). Note that here the niche overlap (green area) is much greater for section Ruderalia than for Erythrosperma. Plots b and e show the results of a univariate analysis of the Annual Mean Temperature. Plots c and f show the results of a univariate analysis of the Annual Precipitation. In all plots, the yellow areas show the niche of the sexuals, the blue areas the niche of the asexuals, and the green areas indicate where the two niches overlap; the grey line shows the whole climatic niche space of the study extent. The degree of niche overlap was estimated using the D‐statistic, for which the significance was tested using 999 permutations (*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001)
FIGURE 3Box‐and‐whisker plots showing niche characteristics for diploid sexual and asexual triploid dandelions of sections Ruderalia and Erythrosperma. The thick line shows the median, and the box shows the upper and lower quartiles, indicative of the width of the niche. Shown are the distributions along the first two axes of a PCA performed on nine bioclimatic variables (see Figure 2a,d and Figure S1)), using the method of Broennimann et al. (2011). Significance of the difference in niche width between sexuals and asexuals was tested using the F‐statistic with 999 random permutations (*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001). For Erythrosperma, this test revealed a significantly wider niche for the asexuals than for the sexuals
FIGURE 4Habitat suitability and distribution maps for sexual and asexual Ruderalia and Erythrosperma, as predicted by a Species Distribution Model created with the MaxEnt software (Phillips et al., 2006). Plots a and d show the predicted habitat suitability for sexuals of the two sections and plots b and e show the predicted habitat for the asexuals. Plots c and f show the predicted ranges, based on the suitability maps and thresholds selected by the method of Liu et al. (2005). Yellow areas indicate the range of the sexuals, blue areas indicate the range of the asexuals, and green areas indicate areas where the ranges of the two reproductive modes overlap
FIGURE 5Relative importance of the nine bioclimatic variables for the species distribution models (see Figure 4) for sexual diploid and asexual triploid dandelions of sections Ruderalia and Erythrosperma. Significance of the differences in Variable Importance between sexuals and asexuals was tested using 999 permutations (*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001), separately for the two sections