Literature DB >> 22518931

The costs of sex: facing real-world complexities.

Stephanie Meirmans1, Patrick G Meirmans, Lawrence R Kirkendall.   

Abstract

Understanding the maintenance of sexual reproduction constitutes a difficult problem for evolutionary biologists because of the immediate costs that sex seems to incur. Typically, general benefits to sex and recombination are investigated that might outweigh these costs. However, several factors can strongly influence the complex balance between costs and benefits of sex; these include constraints on the evolution of asexuality, ecological differentiation, and certain lif-history traits. We review these factors and their empirical support for the first time in a unified framework and find that they can reduce the costs of sex, circumvent them, or make them inapplicable. These factors can even tip the scales to a net benefit for sex. The reviewed factors affect species and species groups differently, and we conclude consequently that understanding the maintenance of sex could turn out to be more species-specific than commonly assumed. Interestingly, our study suggests that, in some species, no general benefits to sex and recombination might be needed to understand the maintenance of sex, as in our case study of dandelions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22518931     DOI: 10.1086/663945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q Rev Biol        ISSN: 0033-5770            Impact factor:   4.875


  24 in total

1.  Does the avoidance of sexual costs increase fitness in asexual invaders?

Authors:  Claus-Peter Stelzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sex pheromone of a coccoid insect with sexual and asexual lineages: fate of an ancestrally essential sexual signal in parthenogenetic females.

Authors:  Jun Tabata; Ryoko T Ichiki; Chie Moromizato; Kenji Mori
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Higher rates of sex evolve during adaptation to more complex environments.

Authors:  Pepijn Luijckx; Eddie Ka Ho Ho; Majid Gasim; Suyang Chen; Andrijana Stanic; Connor Yanchus; Yun Seong Kim; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Can resource costs of polyploidy provide an advantage to sex?

Authors:  M Neiman; A D Kay; A C Krist
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Diapause and maintenance of facultative sexual reproductive strategies.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Stelzer; Jussi Lehtonen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  What do isogamous organisms teach us about sex and the two sexes?

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen; Hanna Kokko; Geoff A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Condition-dependent sex: who does it, when and why?

Authors:  Yoav Ram; Lilach Hadany
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Is meiosis a fundamental cause of inviability among sexual and asexual plants and animals?

Authors:  Daniel A Levitis; Kolea Zimmerman; Anne Pringle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The Evolution of Sex is Tempered by Costly Hybridization in Boechera (Rock Cress).

Authors:  Catherine A Rushworth; Tom Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.645

10.  Higher rate of tissue regeneration in polyploid asexual versus diploid sexual freshwater snails.

Authors:  Nicole R Krois; Anvesh Cherukuri; Nikhil Puttagunta; Maurine Neiman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.