Literature DB >> 29197471

Comparison of Utilization Trends, Indications, and Complications of Endomyocardial Biopsy in Native Versus Donor Hearts (from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2002 to 2014).

Vikas Singh1, Rodrigo Mendirichaga2, Ghanshyambhai T Savani3, Alex Rodriguez4, Vanessa Blumer4, Sammy Elmariah5, Ignacio Inglessis-Azuaje5, Igor Palacios5.   

Abstract

Native heart endomyocardial biopsy (NH-EMB) is an infrequently performed procedure. The objective of this study is to describe utilization trends, indications, and complications associated with NH-EMB in the United States and compare them with transplanted heart endomyocardial biopsy (TH-EMB). Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database, we identified 71,105 adult patients undergoing EMB in the inpatient setting in participating hospitals from 2002 to 2014. A total of 20,770 (29%) were performed on NHs (mean age 52.2 ± 15.3, 61% men). Approximately half of patients were white and mean Charlson co-morbidity index was 1.97 ± 1.6. Common indications for NH-EMB included a suspected primary cardiomyopathy (disorder confined to the myocardium), heart failure without cardiogenic shock, and acute myocarditis. Less common indications included heart failure with cardiogenic shock, unexplained heart failure with ventricular tachycardia or high-degree atrioventricular block, and cardiac neoplasms. Complications included pericardial effusion (3.8%), third-degree atrioventricular block (2.7%), vascular complications (1.9%), and deep venous thrombosis (3.5%), in others. Predictors of complications included presence of a cardiac malignant neoplasm, use of hemodynamic support, heart failure with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and female gender. Compared with NH-EMB, TH-EMB was associated with lower rates of pericardial effusion, third-degree atrioventricular block, ventricular tachyarrhythmias requiring cardioversion, and higher rates of deep venous thrombosis, infections, and pneumothorax. NH-EMB utilization is low in the United States and constitutes less than 1/3 of all EMBs performed.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29197471     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  11 in total

Review 1.  Markers of Immune Function in Heart Transplantation: Implications for Immunosuppression and Screening for Rejection.

Authors:  David X Zhuo; Katie Ginder; E Ashley Hardin
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2021-01-05

2.  Trends in post-heart transplant biopsies for graft rejection versus nonrejection.

Authors:  Aayla K Jamil; Aasim Afzal; Tariq Nisar; Aaron Y Kluger; Joost Felius; Detlef Wencker; Shelley A Hall; Parag Kale
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2021-01-26

Review 3.  Acute myocarditis: aetiology, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Temi Lampejo; Simon M Durkin; Naman Bhatt; Oliver Guttmann
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 5.410

Review 4.  Clinical Manifestations, Monitoring, and Prognosis: A Review of Cardiotoxicity After Antitumor Strategy.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Rong Xu; Bin Zhou; Chao Lin; Yingkun Guo; Huayan Xu; Xia Guo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 5.  Acute and Fulminant Myocarditis: a Pragmatic Clinical Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Enrico Ammirati; Giacomo Veronese; Manlio Cipriani; Francesco Moroni; Andrea Garascia; Michela Brambatti; Eric D Adler; Maria Frigerio
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  The Zabrze'18 protocol is a feasible option to reduce the number of endomyocardial biopsies after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Grzegorz M Kubiak; Radosław Kwieciński; Michał Zakliczyński; Piotr Przybyłowski; Michał O Zembala
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 1.426

7.  Safety evaluation of high-risk myocardial micro-biopsy in a swine model.

Authors:  Arvin Chireh; Mikael Sandell; Rikard Grankvist; Victoria Lövljung; Jonathan Al-Saadi; Fabian Arnberg; Johan Lundberg; Magnus Settergren; Staffan Holmin
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 8.  State-of-the-Art of Endomyocardial Biopsy on Acute Myocarditis and Chronic Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Enrico Ammirati; Andrea Buono; Francesco Moroni; Lorenzo Gigli; John R Power; Michele Ciabatti; Andrea Garascia; Eric D Adler; Maurizio Pieroni
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.955

9.  Management of Acute Myocarditis and Chronic Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy: An Expert Consensus Document.

Authors:  Enrico Ammirati; Maria Frigerio; Leslie T Cooper; Paolo G Camici; Eric D Adler; Cristina Basso; David H Birnie; Michela Brambatti; Matthias G Friedrich; Karin Klingel; Jukka Lehtonen; Javid J Moslehi; Patrizia Pedrotti; Ornella E Rimoldi; Heinz-Peter Schultheiss; Carsten Tschöpe
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 8.790

10.  Endomyocardial biopsy. Do it whenever you need it!

Authors:  Lídia de Sousa
Journal:  Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2020-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.