Literature DB >> 33951174

Effects of protein supplementation to steers consuming low-quality forages on greenhouse gas emissions.

Adam L Shreck1, Joshua M Zeltwanger2, Eric A Bailey2, Jenny S Jennings3, Beverly E Meyer1, Noel Andy Cole1.   

Abstract

Providing supplements that enhance the efficiency of feed utilization can reduce methane (CH4) emissions from ruminants. Protein supplementation is widely used to increase intake and digestion of low-quality forages, yet little is known about its impact on CH4 emissions. British-cross steers (n = 23; initial body weight [BW] = 344 ± 33.9 kg) were used in a three-period crossover design to evaluate the effect of protein supplementation to beef cattle consuming low-quality forage on ruminal CH4, metabolic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, forage intake, and ruminal fermentation. Steers individually had ad libitum access to low-quality bluestem hay (4.6% crude protein [CP]) and were provided supplemental protein based on (dry matter basis): cottonseed meal (CSM; 0.29% of BW daily; 391 g/d CP), dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS; 0.41% of BW daily 563 g/d CP), or none (CON). Urea was added to DDGS to match rumen degradable protein provided by CSM. Ruminal CH4 and metabolic CO2 fluxes were obtained 2.4 ± 0.4 times per steer daily using an automated open-circuit gas quantification system (GreenFeed emission monitoring system; C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD). Forage intake increased (P < 0.01) with protein supplementation; however, no difference in forage intake (P = 0.14) was observed between CSM and DDGS treatments. Flux of CO2 (g/d) was greater (P < 0.01) for steers fed CSM and DDGS than for steers fed CON. Steers supplemented with CSM had greater (P < 0.01) CH4 emissions (211 g/d) than DDGS (197 g/d) both of which were greater (P < 0.01) than CON (175 g/d). Methane emissions as a proportion of gross energy intake (GEI) were lowest (P < 0.01) for DDGS (7.66%), intermediate for CSM (8.46%) steers, and greatest for CON (10.53%). Steers fed DDGS also had the lowest (P < 0.01) ruminal acetate:propionate ratio (3.60), whereas CSM (4.89) was intermediate, and CON (5.64) steers were greatest. This study suggests that the common practice of supplementing protein to cattle consuming low-quality forage decreases greenhouse gas emissions per unit of GEI. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cattle; low-quality forage; methane; protein

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33951174      PMCID: PMC8259849          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  19 in total

1.  Effects of supplemental degradable intake protein on utilization of medium- to low-quality forages.

Authors:  C P Mathis; R C Cochran; J S Heldt; B C Woods; I E Abdelgadir; K C Olson; E C Titgemeyer; E S Vanzant
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of increasing degradable intake protein on intake and digestion of low-quality, tallgrass-prairie forage by beef cows.

Authors:  H H Köster; R C Cochran; E C Titgemeyer; E S Vanzant; I Abdelgadir; G St-Jean
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The effect of supplemental energy, nitrogen, and protein on feed intake, digestibility, and nitrogen flux across the gut and liver in sheep fed low-quality forage.

Authors:  C L Ferrell; K K Kreikemeier; H C Freetly
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effect of ruminal vs postruminal administration of degradable protein on utilization of low-quality forage by beef steers.

Authors:  C A Bandyk; R C Cochran; T A Wickersham; E C Titgemeyer; C G Farmer; J J Higgins
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effects of supplemental protein type on intake, nitrogen balance, and site, and extent of digestion in whiteface wethers consuming low-quality grass hay.

Authors:  M W Salisbury; C R Krehbiel; T T Ross; C L Schultz; L L Melton
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effect of condensed tannin extract supplementation on growth performance, nitrogen balance, gas emissions, and energetic losses of beef steers.

Authors:  P J Ebert; E A Bailey; A L Shreck; J S Jennings; N A Cole
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Influence of protein supplementation on site and extent of digestion, forage intake, and nutrient flow characteristics in steers consuming dormant bluestem-range forage.

Authors:  S M Hannah; R C Cochran; E S Vanzant; D L Harmon
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Methane prediction in dry and lactating Holstein cows.

Authors:  J B Holter; A J Young
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Technical note: Bacterial diversity and fermentation end products in rumen fluid samples collected via oral lavage or rumen cannula.

Authors:  S L Lodge-Ivey; J Browne-Silva; M B Horvath
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Methane emissions from cattle.

Authors:  K A Johnson; D E Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  2 in total

1.  Technical note: using an automated head chamber system to administer an external marker to estimate fecal output by grazing beef cattle.

Authors:  Matthew R Beck; Stacey A Gunter; Corey A Moffet; R Ryan Reuter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Diet and Greenhouse Gas Outputs in Pigs.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.