| Literature DB >> 33948086 |
Bai-Rong Wang1,2, Jun-Teng Yao2, Hui Zheng1, Quan-Min Li1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association of the glycated albumin (GA)/glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ratio with the mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Entities:
Keywords: blood glucose control; blood glucose fluctuation; glycated albumin; glycosylated hemoglobin; type 2 diabetes mellitus
Year: 2021 PMID: 33948086 PMCID: PMC8088300 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S297730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ISSN: 1178-7007 Impact factor: 3.168
Comparison of Clinical Indicators Between Baseline and Follow-Up
| Baseline | After Follow-Up | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HbA1c (%) | 10.31±2.85 | 7.09±0.89 | <0.001 |
| GA (%) | 29.66±11.12 | 20.33±5.25 | <0.001 |
| GA/HbA1c ratios | 2.84±0.51 | 2.59±0.61 | <0.001 |
| The fasting C-peptide (ng/mL) | 1.53±0.75 | 1.64±0.56 | 0.115 |
| The peak value of C-peptide (ng/mL) | 3.05±1.64 | 3.62±1.37 | <0.001 |
Comparison of Clinical Characteristics Between Three Groups of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
| Project | T1 (<2.62) | T2 (2.62~3.03) | T3 (>3.03) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 49.94±13.35 | 47.59±12.14 | 44.53±14.57 | 0.252 |
| Gender [n(%)] | 0.846 | |||
| Male | 20 (58.82) | 22 (64.71) | 22 (64.71) | |
| Female | 14 (41.18) | 12 (35.29) | 12 (35.29) | |
| Baseline BMI (kg/m2) | 24.48±2.53 | 22.50±3.47* | 22.81±3.47* | 0.026 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 28.79±10.08 | 31.85±9.04 | 30.18±9.66 | 0.424 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 48.15±15.92 | 54.83±15.96 | 49.48±13.95 | 0.168 |
| Fasting C-peptide (ng/mL) | 2.23±0.76 | 1.42±0.47* | 0.94±0.31*★ | 0.000 |
| C-peptide peak value (ng/mL) | 4.20±1.51 | 2.97±1.67* | 1.98±0.76*★ | 0.000 |
| MAGE after discharge from hospital (mmol/L) | 5.19±2.12 | 5.64±2.14 | 7.04±2.49*★ | 0.003 |
| Fasting blood glucose after follow-up (mmol/L) | 6.69±0.99 | 7.04±0.96 | 7.49±1.03* | 0.005 |
| GA after follow-up | 15.62±3.28 | 19.80±2.69* | 25.59±3.85*★ | 0.000 |
| HbA1c after follow-up (%) | 6.69±0.96 | 7.09±0.80 | 7.48±0.73* | 0.001 |
| Fasting C-peptide after follow-up (ng/mL) | 1.83±0.68 | 1.68±0.47 | 1.41±0.43*★ | 0.005 |
| C-peptide peak value after follow-up (ng/mL) | 3.96±1.49 | 3.90±1.42 | 3.01±0.94*★ | 0.005 |
| GA/HbA1c after follow-up | 2.36±0.56 | 2.61±0.62 | 2.80±0.61* | 0.013 |
Notes: *Compared with T1 group, P <0.05; ★compared with T2 group, P <0.05.
Correlation Between Baseline MAGE, Fasting C-Peptide, C-Peptide Peak and Baseline GA/HbA1c
| Independent Variables | Dependent Variables | A Multiple Linear Stepwise Regression | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | P | |||
| Baseline MAGE | Baseline GA/HbA1c | 0.061 | 0.004 | 0.606 |
| Baseline fasting C-peptide | −0.526 | 0.000 | ||
| Baseline C-peptide peak level | −0.006 | 0.000 | ||
Note: The control variables were age, gender and BMI.
Abbreviation: R2, coefficient of determination.
Figure 1Comparison of area under curve ROC of MAGE and GA/HbA1c in the diagnosis of islet function.
Correlation Between Baseline GA/HbA1c, C-Peptide Peak and Fasting Blood Glucose, HbA1c, GA/HbA1c, Fasting C-Peptide, C-Peptide Peak After Follow-Up
| Independent Variables | Dependent Variables | A Multiple Linear Stepwise Regression | |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | P | ||
| Baseline GA/HbA1c | Blood glucose at follow-up | 0.726 | <0.001 |
| HbA1c at follow-up | 0.708 | <0.001 | |
| GA/HbA1c ratio at follow-up | 0.324 | <0.001 | |
| Fasting C-peptide at follow-up | - | - | |
| C-peptide peak value at follow-up | - | - | |
| Baseline C-peptide peak level | Blood glucose at follow-up | - | - |
| HbA1c at follow-up | - | - | |
| GA/HbA1c ratio at follow-up | - | - | |
| Fasting C-peptide at follow-up | 0.175 | <0.001 | |
| C-peptide peak value at follow-up | 0.460 | <0.001 | |
Notes: Baseline GA, HbA1c, GA/HbA1c, fasting C-peptide, C-peptide peak, and MAGE were independent variables; fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, GA/HbA1c, fasting C-peptide, and C-peptide peak after follow-up were the dependent variables; the control variables were age, gender and BMI.