Chen-Yi Xie1, Yi-Huai Hu2,3,4, Joshua Wing-Kei Ho5, Lu-Jun Han3,6, Hong Yang2,3,4, Jing Wen3,4, Ka-On Lam7, Ian Yu-Hong Wong8, Simon Ying-Kit Law8, Keith Wan-Hang Chiu1, Jian-Hua Fu2,3,4, Varut Vardhanabhuti1. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510000, China. 3. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510000, China. 4. Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou 510000, China. 5. School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 6. Department of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510000, China. 7. Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 8. Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic value of baseline and restaging CT-based radiomics with features associated with gene expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) plus surgery. METHODS: We enrolled 106 ESCC patients receiving nCRT from two institutions. Gene expression profiles of 28 patients in the training set were used to detect differentially expressed (DE) genes between patients with and without relapse. Radiomic features that were correlated to DE genes were selected, followed by additional machine learning selection. A radiomic nomogram for disease-free survival (DFS) prediction incorporating the radiomic signature and prognostic clinical characteristics was established for DFS estimation and validated. RESULTS: The radiomic signature with DE genes feature selection achieved better performance for DFS prediction than without. The nomogram incorporating the radiomic signature and lymph nodal status significantly stratified patients into high and low-risk groups for DFS (p < 0.001). The areas under the curve (AUCs) for predicting 5-year DFS were 0.912 in the training set, 0.852 in the internal test set, 0.769 in the external test set. CONCLUSIONS: Genomics association was useful for radiomic feature selection. The established radiomic signature was prognostic for DFS. The radiomic nomogram could provide a valuable prediction for individualized long-term survival.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic value of baseline and restaging CT-based radiomics with features associated with gene expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) plus surgery. METHODS: We enrolled 106 ESCC patients receiving nCRT from two institutions. Gene expression profiles of 28 patients in the training set were used to detect differentially expressed (DE) genes between patients with and without relapse. Radiomic features that were correlated to DE genes were selected, followed by additional machine learning selection. A radiomic nomogram for disease-free survival (DFS) prediction incorporating the radiomic signature and prognostic clinical characteristics was established for DFS estimation and validated. RESULTS: The radiomic signature with DE genes feature selection achieved better performance for DFS prediction than without. The nomogram incorporating the radiomic signature and lymph nodal status significantly stratified patients into high and low-risk groups for DFS (p < 0.001). The areas under the curve (AUCs) for predicting 5-year DFS were 0.912 in the training set, 0.852 in the internal test set, 0.769 in the external test set. CONCLUSIONS: Genomics association was useful for radiomic feature selection. The established radiomic signature was prognostic for DFS. The radiomic nomogram could provide a valuable prediction for individualized long-term survival.
Authors: Adam C Berger; Jeffrey Farma; Walter J Scott; Gary Freedman; Louis Weiner; Jonathan D Cheng; Hao Wang; Melvyn Goldberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-03-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Roger Sun; Elaine Johanna Limkin; Maria Vakalopoulou; Laurent Dercle; Stéphane Champiat; Shan Rong Han; Loïc Verlingue; David Brandao; Andrea Lancia; Samy Ammari; Antoine Hollebecque; Jean-Yves Scoazec; Aurélien Marabelle; Christophe Massard; Jean-Charles Soria; Charlotte Robert; Nikos Paragios; Eric Deutsch; Charles Ferté Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Y Jiang; H Wang; J Wu; C Chen; Q Yuan; W Huang; T Li; S Xi; Y Hu; Z Zhou; Y Xu; G Li; R Li Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Hugo J W L Aerts; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Sara Carvalho; Sara Cavalho; Johan Bussink; René Monshouwer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Derek Rietveld; Frank Hoebers; Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Andre Dekker; John Quackenbush; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 14.919