| Literature DB >> 33946667 |
Diana Salikhova1,2, Tatiana Bukharova1, Elvira Cherkashova3,4, Daria Namestnikova3,4, Georgy Leonov1, Maria Nikitina2, Ilya Gubskiy3,4, Gevorg Akopyan4, Andrey Elchaninov2, Konstantin Midiber2, Natalia Bulatenco1, Victoria Mokrousova1, Andrey Makarov3, Konstantin Yarygin5,6, Vladimir Chekhonin3, Liudmila Mikhaleva2, Timur Fatkhudinov2,7, Dmitry Goldshtein1,7.
Abstract
Transplantation of various types of stem cells as a possible therapy for stroke has been tested for years, and the results are promising. Recent investigations have shown that the administration of the conditioned media obtained after stem cell cultivation can also be effective in the therapy of the central nervous system pathology (hypothesis of their paracrine action). The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of the conditioned medium of hiPSC-derived glial and neuronal progenitor cells in the rat middle cerebral artery occlusion model of the ischemic stroke. Secretory activity of the cultured neuronal and glial progenitor cells was evaluated by proteomic and immunosorbent-based approaches. Therapeutic effects were assessed by overall survival, neurologic deficit and infarct volume dynamics, as well as by the end-point values of the apoptosis- and inflammation-related gene expression levels, the extent of microglia/macrophage infiltration and the numbers of formed blood vessels in the affected area of the brain. As a result, 31% of the protein species discovered in glial progenitor cells-conditioned medium and 45% in neuronal progenitor cells-conditioned medium were cell type specific. The glial progenitor cell-conditioned media showed a higher content of neurotrophins (BDNF, GDNF, CNTF and NGF). We showed that intra-arterial administration of glial progenitor cells-conditioned medium promoted a faster decrease in neurological deficit compared to the control group, reduced microglia/macrophage infiltration, reduced expression of pro-apoptotic gene Bax and pro-inflammatory cytokine gene Tnf, increased expression of anti-inflammatory cytokine genes (Il4, Il10, Il13) and promoted the formation of blood vessels within the damaged area. None of these effects were exerted by the neuronal progenitor cell-conditioned media. The results indicate pronounced cytoprotective, anti-inflammatory and angiogenic properties of soluble factors secreted by glial progenitor cells.Entities:
Keywords: MCAO; conditioned medium; glial progenitor cells; induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs); ischemic stroke; neuronal progenitor cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33946667 PMCID: PMC8125106 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094694
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Morphology and characterization of the cultures differentiating towards neuronal and glial phenotypes. (a) Characterization of hiPSCs: phase−contrast microscopy, immunocytochemistry for the pluripotency markers (SSEA4, TRA−1−81, OCT4, NANOG), relative gene expression levels for OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG were calculated based on the housekeeping genes GAPDH and ACTB, and then normalized to dermal fibroblasts. (b) Functional assay of pluripotency: phase−contrast microscopy of the embryoid bodies and immunocytochemistry of spontaneously differentiated hiPSC derivatives with ectoderm−, mesoderm− and endoderm− specific antibodies (anti−pan−cytokeratin, anti−desmin and anti−α−fetoprotein, respectively). (c) Characterization of NSCs: phase−contrast microscopy, immunocytochemistry, flow cytometry for PAX6+ cells and relative gene expression levels for neural markers (PAX6, NESTIN, SOX2), which were calculated based on the housekeeping genes GAPDH and ACTB, and then normalized to hiPSC. (d) Characterization of GPCs and NPCs: phase−contrast microscopy, immunocytochemistry for S100B (glial marker) and βIII tubulin (TUBB3, neuronal marker), flow cytometry for S100B+ and TUBB3+ cells and relative gene expression levels for glial and neuronal markers, which were calculated based on the housekeeping genes GAPDH and ACTB, and then normalized to hiPSC. The results are shown for the GPCs and NPCs derived from a single hiPSC line.
Secreted proteins of the hiPSC-derived neuronal and glial progenitor cells identified by a proteomic approach.
| Biological Processes | Neuronal Progenitor Cells (NPCs) | Glial Progenitor Cells (GPCs) |
|---|---|---|
| regulation of apoptosis and cell survival | tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP2) | heat shock 70 kDa protein 4 (HSPA4) |
| secretogranin-2 (chromogranin C, SCG2) | heat shock protein 105 kDa (HSPH1) | |
| Wnt family member 5a (WNT5A) | Hsc70-interacting protein (ST13) | |
| neuropilin-1 (NRP1) | leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) | |
| Ras homolog family member A (RHOA) | growth arrest-specific protein 6 (GAS6) | |
| platelet-derived growth factor D (PDGFD) | gremlin 1 (GREM1) | |
| tetranectin (TETN) | ||
| influence on immune cells | annexin A1 (ANXA1) | collectin subfamily member 12 (COLEC12) |
| nectin 2 (NECTIN2) | vitamin D binding protein (VTDB) | |
| meteorin-like protein (METRNL) | importin subunit beta 1 (KPNB1) | |
| moesin (MSN) | Toll-interacting protein (TOLLIP) | |
| apolipoprotein A1 (APOA1) | S100-A11 protein (S100A11) | |
| osteopontin (SPP1) | growth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) | |
| 28 kDa heat- and acid-stable | SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich-like protein 3 (SH3BGRL3) | |
| Ras-related protein Rap-1b (RAP1B) | ||
| angiogenesis | lactadherin (MFGE8) | myeloid-derived growth factor (MYDGF) |
| secretogranin 3 (SCG3) | transforming growth factor-β2 (TGFB2) | |
| glypican-1 (GPC1) |
Figure 2Comparative analysis of the secretory activity and transcription profiles of the hiPSC-derived NPC and GPC cultures. (a) Proportions of unique and common proteins in NPC and GPC secretomes. In total, 136 (45%) proteins in NPC-CM and 75 (31%) proteins in GPC-CM were specific. (b) PANTHER protein class charts for NPC and GPC secretomes. (c) Secretion of neurotrophins by NPC and GPC (ELISA). The highest concentrations of BDNF, NGF, CNTF and GDNF contain GPC-CM. (d) Expression levels of NPC and GPC markers (PCR assay). The data are presented as mean ± SD. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). These results are shown for the GPCs and NPCs derived from a single hiPSC line.
Figure 3Therapeutic effects of NPC-CM and GPC-CM assessed by the overall survival dynamics, the stroke volume (evaluated by MRI), the dynamics of the neurological deficit (evaluated by mNSS for rodents) and relative gene expression levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and apoptosis regulator (Bax, Bcl2). In this experiment, the following number of animals were used: NPC-CM group (n = 12), GPC-CM group (n = 12) and the non-conditioned media-treated control (n = 10). (a) Kaplan–Meier survival curves for three groups. Note that animals in both groups died mostly within the first 3 days after MCAO, presumably because of the formation of vasogenic edema. No significant difference between the two groups was found. (b) mNSS dynamics (normalized by day 1 values). IA administration of GPC-CM enhanced functional recovery of the ischemic brain. The graph demonstrates the reduction of the neurological deficit in the GPC-CM group compared to the control group on the 14th and 30th day. (c) Infarct volume dynamics (normalized by day 1 values). IA administration of NPC-CM and GPC-CM had no significant effect on the rate of the reduction of the infarct zone volume. (d) T2-weighted brain images (T2-WI) for three groups (NPC-CM-treated, GPC-CM-treated and the non-conditioned media-treated control). (e) Relative gene expression levels of Bax, Bcl2 and their ratio; pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. IA administration of GPC-CM reduced expression of Bax, Tnfa and increased expression of Il4, Il10 and Il13 genes. The data are presented as mean ± SD with asterisks (*) indicating significant differences with the control (p ≤ 0.05). Hashes (#) indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between GPC-CM- and NPC-CM-treated animals.
Figure 4Post-ischemic repair-related effects of the conditioned media. In this experiment, the following number of animals were used: NPC-CM group (n = 12), GPC-CM group (n = 12) and the non-conditioned media-treated control (n = 10). (a) Representative routine histology images (H&E), immunohistochemistry with anti-CD34 antibodies and TUNEL-labelled cell death (the nuclei counterstained with DAPI). Scale bar, 200 and 500 µm. (b) Counts of blood vessels CD34+ and TUNEL-positive cells per sq mm of the damaged brain tissue section area. The graph demonstrates the increment of number blood vessels and reduction of the number of TUNEL-positive cells in the case of GPC-CM administration. The data are presented as mean ± SD. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) with the controls. Hashes (#) indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between GPC-CM- and NPC-CM-treated animals.
Figure 5Post-ischemic inflammation-related effects of the conditioned media. Assessment of total M1 and M2 macrophages/microglia. In this experiment, the following number of animals were used: NPC-CM group (n = 12), GPC-CM group (n = 12) and the non-conditioned media-treated control (n = 10). (a) Immunohistochemistry with anti-CD68, anti-CD11b, anti-CD86 (M1) and anti-CD20 (M2) antibodies (the nuclei counterstained with DAPI). Scale bar, 100 and 200 µm. (b) Counts of macrophages/microglia CD68+, CD11b+, CD86+ and CD206+ cells per sq mm of the brain tissue section area. The graph demonstrates the reduction of the total number of macrophages/microglia (CD68+ and CD11b+ cells) and M1 macrophages in the case of GPC-CM administration. There were no significant differences in the number of M2 macrophages between the groups. The data are presented as mean ± SD. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) with the controls. Hashes (#) indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between GPC-CM- and NPC-CM-treated animals.
Sequences and annealing temperatures of PCR primers.
| Target | Sequence (5′ to 3′) | Annealing Temperature, °C |
|---|---|---|
|
| for TTGTGGCTGGAGTCCTCACT | 63 |
|
| for GGGGCTACGAGTGGGATACT | 62.5 |
|
| for CCACCACGCTCTTCTGTCTA | 60.1 |
|
| for ATGTAACGACAGCCCTCTGA | 56.6 |
|
| for GCCCAGAAATCAAGGAGCAT | 58.5 |
|
| for CCAGAAGACTTCCCTGTGCA | 62.3 |
|
| for GAGATTACTGCCCTGGCTCC | 56.6 |
|
| for GCGAGATCCCGCTAACATCA | 55 |
|
| for GAAAAGGTCGGAGAGGCCAG | 63 |
|
| for CCAGGTGAGAAGAGTGATGACC | 62.6 |
|
| for GTAAACCCAGCTGACTTGTTTCC | 55.5 |
|
| for ACCCGCAACATTACTGTGGACC | 55 |
|
| for CTCAGCACCGCTAACAGAGG | 62 |
|
| for GCCAGACGCGCCCAGTATGAGG | 62 |
|
| for AGCTTTCCAGCCGTGTTGTA | 60.1 |
|
| forAGCCTCTACGGGCATCTATGA | 62 |
|
| for CTGCGGCTCGATCAACTCA | 61 |
|
| for GTGACGGAGCGCAAATACCT | 56.7 |
|
| for ATCCTCCTCTTTGCCGGAGG | 59.1 |
|
| for CACCTGCGTATCTCTCGGGC | 59.7 |
|
| for GAGCTGTACCGCATAGTCGT | 56.7 |
|
| for CCACGACGGTGGCGTTTG | 60 |
|
| for ACATTGGCAAAACACCCAAGA | 55.6 |
|
| for TAGAGCGGGAAACCATTGAG | 54.5 |
|
| for GGCAGCAGCTACAGCGAAATG | 58.0 |
|
| for TTGGACAAGAGCAGGACACC rev GAGCAGTTGGCGATGTTGAC | 57.0 |
|
| for GCTGCAGAATGCCAAGTACGA | 58.1 |
|
| for GTTGGGCAAGATCCCAATGC | 57.0 |
|
| for CTTCCTCACCGACCTCAACAA | 57.6 |
|
| for TGAGCATAAAGAGCCGGTAGC | 58.1 |
|
| for TGGTAACTGCTAAAGAGAGCCA | 56.5 |
|
| for GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTCA | 56.6 |
|
| for CCTGGCACCCAGCACAAT | 58.2 |
R. norvegicus and H. sapiens gene-specific oligonucleotides.