| Literature DB >> 33941518 |
Adam J Plaunt1, Sasha J Rose1, Jeong Yeon Kang1, Kuan-Ju Chen1, Daniel LaSala1, Ryan P Heckler1, Arielle Dorfman1, Barrett T Smith1, Donald Chun1, Veronica Viramontes1, Antonio Macaluso1, Zhili Li1, Yuchen Zhou1, Lilly Mark1, Jessica Basso1, Franziska G Leifer1, Michel R Corboz1, Richard W Chapman1, David Cipolla1, Walter R Perkins1, Vladimir S Malinin1, Donna M Konicek1.
Abstract
Chronic pulmonary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) disease in cystic fibrosis (CF) has a high probability of recurrence following treatment with standard-of-care antibiotics and represents an area of unmet need associated with reduced life expectancy. We developed a lipoglycopeptide therapy customized for pulmonary delivery that not only demonstrates potent activity against planktonic MRSA, but also against protected colonies of MRSA in biofilms and within cells, the latter of which have been linked to clinical antibiotic failure. A library of next-generation potent lipoglycopeptides was synthesized with an emphasis on attaining superior pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics to similar compounds of their class. Our strategy focused on hydrophobic modification of vancomycin, where ester and amide functionality were included with carbonyl configuration and alkyl length as key variables. Candidates representative of each carbonyl attachment chemistry demonstrated potent activity in vitro, with several compounds being 30 to 60 times more potent than vancomycin. Selected compounds were advanced into in vivo nose-only inhalation PK evaluations in rats, where RV94, a potent lipoglycopeptide that utilizes an inverted amide linker to attach a 10-carbon chain to vancomycin, demonstrated the most favorable lung residence time after inhalation. Further in vitro evaluation of RV94 showed superior activity to vancomycin against an expanded panel of Gram-positive organisms, cellular accumulation and efficacy against intracellular MRSA, and MRSA biofilm killing. Moreover, in vivo efficacy of inhaled nebulized RV94 in a 48 h acute model of pulmonary MRSA (USA300) infection in neutropenic rats demonstrated statistically significant antibacterial activity that was superior to inhaled vancomycin.Entities:
Keywords: MRSA; biofilm; cystic fibrosis; inhaled antibiotics; intracellular infection; lipoglycopeptide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33941518 PMCID: PMC8373216 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00316-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
FIG 1Structural comparison between vancomycin, RV40, and telavancin depicting a carbonyl incorporation strategy to develop the RV lipoglycopeptide antibiotic library.
RV lipoglycopeptide and comparator antibiotic structure activity summary with cLogP values calculated using the ChemDraw software package
Pharmacokinetic parameters from single nebulized inhaled doses of RV lipoglycopeptides and comparators administered by nose-only inhalation to healthy rats
| Compound | Delivered dose (mg/kg) | Pulmonary dose (mg/kg) | Lung | Lung t1/2 (h) | Lung AUC0-∞ (μg· h/g) | Plasma | Lung: Plasma | Drug (byproduct) lung level at 120 h (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vancomycin | 10 | 0.20 | 31 | 23 | 671 | 8.0 | 4 | ND |
| Telavancin | 0.4 | 0.03 | 12 | 507 | 3877 | BLQ | ND | 81 |
| RV40 | 4.9 | 0.30 | 48 | >333 | 9800 | 0.10 | 690 | 105 |
| RV88 | 23 | 0.12 | 26 | 21 | 360 | 0.02 | 1350 | 1.5 (71) |
| RV62 | 0.7 | 0.15 | 30 | 11 | 317 | 0.02 | 1550 | 0.1 (107) |
| RV94 | 15 | 1.10 | 262 | 108 | 40671 | 0.14 | 1871 | 45 (0.1) |
Dose estimated from test article concentration and aerosol delivery flow rates due to insufficient filter sampling of the aerosol concentration at the time of the experiment.
The RV40 lung half-life (t1/2) mean value was calculated as 5,140 h, with the 95% confidence interval (CI) lower range being 333 h.
The RV lipoglycopeptide levels at 120 h postdose are relative to IPD levels, as are the primary hydrolysis by-products which are listed in parentheses. Telavancin, RV40, and vancomycin are not hydrolysable and therefore have no by-products listed. The vancomycin level was not determined (ND) at 120 h because the experiment concluded at 24 h. Telavancin lung: plasma Cmax could not be determined because the plasma concentrations were BLQ (below limit of quantitation) at all time points. The limit of detection for drug concentrations in plasma was typically in the range of 1 to 20 ng/ml. PK plots can be seen in Fig. S3 in the supplemental material.
The delivered dose is the dose presented to the nose of the animals during the inhalation procedure as determined by an aerosol sampling filter and subsequent analytical measurement of drug extracted from the filter (49). The pulmonary dose is the dose determined by direct measurement of compounds in the lung tissue. Cmax, t1/2, and AUC0-∞ were determined by noncompartmental extravascular analysis using PK solver 2.0 and applying the linear up/log down method.
Summary of RV94 and comparator in vitro microbiological activity against 74 Gram-positive organisms determined by broth microdilution
| Organism | Type | No. of isolates | RV40 | RV94 | Telavancin | Vancomycin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC (μg/ml) | MIC:MBC | MIC (μg/ml) | MIC:MBC | MIC (μg/ml) | MIC:MBC | MIC (μg/ml) | MIC:MBC | |||
| Gram-positive aerobes | ||||||||||
| | MSSA | 4 | 0.012 | 1 | 0.023 | 8 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.75 | 1 |
| | MRSA | 12 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.015 | 1 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 |
| | hVISA | 2 | 0.023 | 1 | 0.08 | 8 | 0.19 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 |
| | VISA | 5 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.12 | 2 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| | VRSA | 12 | NT | NT | 4 | NT | NT | NT | >64 | NT |
| | MSSE | 1 | 0.015 | NT | 0.015 | NT | 0.12 | NT | 0.5 | NT |
| | MRSE | 2 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.12 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| | 1 | 0.004 | NT | 0.015 | NT | 0.06 | NT | 0.25 | NT | |
| | 1 | 0.015 | NT | 0.06 | NT | 0.06 | NT | 1 | NT | |
| | 1 | 0.015 | NT | 0.03 | NT | 0.06 | NT | 0.5 | NT | |
| | VSE | 2 | 0.023 | >8 | 0.03 | >8 | 0.19 | >8 | 1.5 | >8 |
| | VanA VRE | 1 | 0.5 | 8 | 0.03 | >8 | 1 | 8 | 128 | NT |
| | VSE | 1 | 0.004 | NT | 0.015 | NT | 0.06 | NT | 0.5 | NT |
| | VanA VRE | 1 | 1 | >4 | 2 | >8 | 2 | >4 | 128 | NT |
| | VanB VRE | 1 | 0.008 | >8 | 0.03 | >8 | 0.06 | >8 | 64 | >2 |
| | PISP | 2 | 0.004 | 1 | 0.006 | 4 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.6 | 8 |
| | PRSP | 1 | ≤0.008 | NT | 0.008 | NT | 0.03 | NT | 0.25 | NT |
| | 2 | 0.04 | NT | 0.012 | NT | 0.06 | NT | 0.25 | NT | |
| | ermR | 1 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.06 | 1 | 1 | |
| | 2 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.02 | 4 | 0.06 | >8 | 0.25 | 4 | |
| | ermR | 1 | 0.008 | NT | 0.004 | NT | 0.06 | NT | 0.25 | NT |
| | 3 | 0.015 | 1 | 0.008 | 4 | 0.12 | 4 | 0.25 | >8 | |
| | AGS | 1 | 0.015 | >8 | 0.015 | >8 | 0.06 | >8 | 0.5 | >8 |
| | AGS | 1 | 0.008 | NT | 0.008 | NT | 0.03 | NT | 0.25 | NT |
| | MGS | 2 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 |
| | MGS | 1 | 0.015 | NT | 0.015 | NT | 0.06 | NT | 0.5 | NT |
| Gram-positive anaerobes | ||||||||||
| | toxAB- | 1 | 0.06 | NT | 0.015 | NT | 0.12 | NT | 0.25 | NT |
| | ribo 027 | 1 | 0.06 | NT | 0.015 | NT | 0.12 | NT | 0.5 | NT |
| | NAP1;ribo 027 | 1 | 0.12 | NT | 0.06 | NT | 0.12 | NT | 1 | NT |
| | 1 | 0.015 | NT | 0.008 | NT | 0.015 | NT | 0.25 | NT | |
| | 1 | 0.06 | NT | NT | NT | 0.12 | NT | NT | NT | |
| | 1 | 0.008 | NT | 0.008 | NT | 0.03 | NT | 0.12 | NT | |
| | 2 | 0.008 | NT | 0.008 | NT | 0.02 | NT | 0.19 | NT | |
| | 1 | NT | NT | 0.008 | NT | NT | NT | 0.5 | NT | |
MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus; hVISA, heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus; VISA, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus; VRSA, vancomycin-resistant S. aureus, MSSE, methicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis; MRSE, methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis; VSE, vancomycin-susceptible enterococci; VanA VRE, VanA-type vancomycin-resistant enterococci (vancomycin- and teicoplanin-resistant); VanB VRE, VanB-type vancomycin-resistant enterococci (vancomycin-resistant and teicoplanin-susceptible); PISP, penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae; PRSP, penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae; ermR, erythromycin-resistant; AGS, anginosus group streptococci; MGS, mitis group streptococci; NT, not tested.
MIC listed in the cells is the median MIC value. The MBC was measured on one organism and type except for MRSA, where the MBC represents the median of n = 5, and VISA, where it represents the median of n = 2. MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC, minimum bactericidal concentration.
FIG 2In vitro activities of RV94 and select comparators against antibiotic-susceptible and -resistant forms of S. aureus as determined by broth microdilution. MIC, minimum inhibitor concentration. Data plotted as median MIC and error bars are range. Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), n = 4 isolates; methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), n = 11 (RV94) or 12 isolates; heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA), n = 2 (RV94) or 3 isolates; vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA), n = 5 isolates.
FIG 3In vitro accumulation and MRSA killing of RV94 and comparators in THP-1 cells. (A) Cellular accumulation of RV compounds and comparators in THP-1 cells. Cells were treated with test compounds for 24 h. Data are plotted as means ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3 per time point). (B) In vitro intracellular activity of RV compounds against intracellular MRSA ATCC BAA 1556 (USA300) in THP-1 cells. Cells were infected with MRSA for 1 h at MOI equal to 10. Incubation with lysostaphin (25 mg/ml) was done for 2 h to eliminate residual extracellular bacteria. Wells were washed with PBS, replaced with medium containing test compounds and 150 nM bafilomycin A1 (47), and incubated for 24 h. After treatment, cells were lysed and surviving intracellular bacteria were enumerated. Log10 CFU reduction for each concentration of respective test compound relative to the log10 CFU count of untreated cells is presented. The average untreated cell MRSA count was 4.9 ± 0.5 log10 CFU/ml (n = 3). Each ml of medium contained 7.5 × 105 cells. Data are plotted as averages ± SD; n = 3 (RV40, telavancin, and vancomycin) or n = 2 (RV94) per experiment, with each experiment having n = 3 measurements. Limit of detection (LOD) = 2.0 log10 CFU/ml. Statistics are based on two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple-comparison test. P = 0.0005 for RV40 (64 μg/ml) versus control.
FIG 4RV94 and comparator in vitro biofilm activity against MRSA ATCC BAA 1556 (USA300). Statistical analysis is based on two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple-comparison test. Asterisks designating statistical significance were omitted from the plots for clarity. (A) In vitro activity against a simple MRSA biofilm conducted in a static microtiter plate with minimum essential media (MEM). MRSA biofilms (at an inoculum of 7.7 log10 CFU/ml) were formed in plastic microtiter plates, as detailed in the Materials and Methods section and described previously (48). At 6 h postinoculation, test compounds were added to the biofilm culture and then incubated for another 16 h before disruption. The disrupted biofilms were collected and processed for CFU enumeration. Data are plotted as the mean change in log10 CFU/ml reduction versus untreated biofilm. Error is the standard error of the mean (SEM) for n = 4 (vancomycin, RV94) or n = 3 (telavancin, RV40) per experiment, with triplicate measurements in each experiment. Untreated MRSA biofilm average titer = 7.2 ± 0.1 log10 CFU/ml (n = 17). LOD = 2.6 log10 CFU/ml. Statistical significance was as follows for drug-treated versus control biofilms: RV40 for concentrations ≥1.25 μg/ml (P = 0.002 at 1.25 μg/ml); telavancin for concentrations ≥10 μg/ml (P = 0.02 at 10 μg/ml); vancomycin for concentrations ≥22 μg/ml (P = 0.0008), and no statistical significance was observed for the RV94 treatment. (B) In vitro activity of RV lipoglycopeptides in comparison to vancomycin against a more complex MRSA biofilm using the MBEC assay system. MRSA biofilms (at an inoculum of 7.7 log10 CFU/ml) were developed in TSB with the addition of 1% human plasma for 24 h. The biofilms established on the peg lid were challenged with test compounds in MHIIB broth for another 24 h. Biofilm disruption was performed by two sonication cycles and further processed for CFU enumeration. Data are plotted as the mean change in log10 CFU/peg reduction versus untreated biofilm. Error is SEM for n = 1 experiment for each drug with triplicate measurements. Untreated MRSA biofilm average titer = 6.2 log10 CFU/peg. LOD = 1.1 log10 CFU/peg. Statistical significance was as follows for drug-treated versus control biofilms: RV94 for concentrations ≥2 μg/ml (P = 0.04 at 2 μg/ml); RV40 for concentrations ≥4 μg/ml (P < 0.0001 at 4 μg/ml); vancomycin for concentrations ≥16 μg/ml (P = 0.0007 at 16 μg/ml).
FIG 5In vivo efficacy of RV94 and RV40 versus vancomycin when administered by nebulized nose-only inhalation in an acute pulmonary MRSA (ATCC BAA 1556; USA300) infection in neutropenic rats. Rats were rendered neutropenic with intraperitoneal (i.p.) cyclophosphamide on day −4 (150 mg/kg) and day −1 (100 mg/kg) relative to the challenge. On day 0 at 0 h, rats were challenged with MRSA via intranasal instillation at a target titer of 8.0 to 8.3 log10 CFU. At 24 and 32 h postchallenge, rats were loaded into a 12-port inhalation dosing tower, where they received nebulized drug or vehicle control treatments by nose-only inhalation. Animals were euthanized at 48 h postinfection for enumeration of lung MRSA titer. MRSA lung titer of test article treatments versus control is plotted for three separate experiments. Bars are geometric mean and error is SEM; n = 10 (vancomycin and control, RV94 and control) or 8 (RV40 and control) per group. Control is inhaled saline (vancomycin) or bicine (solvent for RV40 and RV94). The average of two doses delivered at 24 and 32 h postchallenge for vancomycin was 49.8 ± 0.6 mg/kg, for RV40 the average was 14.4 ± 2.6 mg/kg, and for RV94 it was 18.8 ± 0.7 mg/kg. Statistics are based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for drug treatment versus control (RV94, P = 0.01). LOD = 2.1 log10 CFU/lungset.