| Literature DB >> 33935923 |
Tao Xiaolong1, Nida Gull2, Shahid Iqbal3, Muhammad Asghar2, Ahsan Nawaz4, Gadah Albasher5, Javaria Hameed6, Ahsen Maqsoom7.
Abstract
The study is based on validating and exploring the effects of a mega project plan (CPEC) on infrastructure development and Sustainable Project Management. The CPEC has great importance to infrastructure development and economy-boosting. The current study's primary aim is to deal with environmental protection, economic boost up, international relations influencing to the Project's success. The paper also addressed project management as a moderator between environmental protection, economic boost up, international relations, and the CPEC project's success. The primary data has been gathered by using questionnaires, and PLS-SEM has been employed for the analysis. The results revealed that environmental protection, economy boost up, and international relations have a positive association with the success of CPEC. The outcomes also exposed that project management moderating among the nexus of economy boosts up the international relations and success of CPEC. The present study results guided how Pakistan and China make the CPEC project stronger with the efficient implementation of practices required for protecting the environment, with the economic growth and boost up, and good strong relations with foreign countries. This study was an attempt to validate the different factors to check their association with each other in a new environment, resulting in a leading edge for the success of mega projects that influence project management.Entities:
Keywords: CPEC; economy boosting; environmental protection; project management; project success; sustainable development
Year: 2021 PMID: 33935923 PMCID: PMC8085247 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663199
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Hypothesis development and study framework.
Figure 2The study model.
Convergent validity.
| Economy boost up | EBU1 | 0.848 | 0.775 | 0.821 | 0.606 |
| EBU2 | 0.760 | ||||
| EBU3 | 0.721 | ||||
| Environmental protection | EP1 | 0.835 | 0.869 | 0.900 | 0.600 |
| EP2 | 0.731 | ||||
| EP3 | 0.727 | ||||
| EP4 | 0.785 | ||||
| EP5 | 0.763 | ||||
| EP6 | 0.802 | ||||
| International relations | IR1 | 0.812 | 0.840 | 0.893 | 0.675 |
| IR2 | 0.849 | ||||
| IR3 | 0.821 | ||||
| IR4 | 0.804 | ||||
| Project management | PM1 | 0.792 | 0.773 | 0.803 | 0.511 |
| PM2 | 0.513 | ||||
| PM4 | 0.747 | ||||
| PM5 | 0.772 | ||||
| Success of CPEC | SCPEC2 | 0.782 | 0.827 | 0.898 | 0.747 |
| SCPEC4 | 0.910 | ||||
| SCPEC5 | 0.895 |
Fornell Larcker method.
| EBU | 0.778 | ||||
| EP | 0.471 | 0.775 | |||
| IR | 0.559 | 0.628 | 0.822 | ||
| PM | 0.482 | 0.548 | 0.554 | 0.715 | |
| SCPEC | 0.523 | 0.692 | 0.601 | 0.533 | 0.864 |
Cross-loadings.
| EBU1 | 0.442 | 0.554 | 0.471 | 0.481 | |
| EBU2 | 0.273 | 0.328 | 0.319 | 0.357 | |
| EBU3 | 0.368 | 0.394 | 0.314 | 0.369 | |
| EP1 | 0.393 | 0.508 | 0.548 | 0.652 | |
| EP2 | 0.408 | 0.578 | 0.414 | 0.595 | |
| EP3 | 0.397 | 0.371 | 0.443 | 0.567 | |
| EP4 | 0.329 | 0.491 | 0.354 | 0.446 | |
| EP5 | 0.338 | 0.482 | 0.348 | 0.400 | |
| EP6 | 0.290 | 0.476 | 0.375 | 0.466 | |
| IR1 | 0.330 | 0.505 | 0.452 | 0.515 | |
| IR2 | 0.365 | 0.554 | 0.441 | 0.534 | |
| IR3 | 0.558 | 0.489 | 0.477 | 0.455 | |
| IR4 | 0.617 | 0.511 | 0.456 | 0.463 | |
| PM1 | 0.389 | 0.402 | 0.417 | 0.404 | |
| PM2 | 0.263 | 0.282 | 0.308 | 0.270 | |
| PM4 | 0.363 | 0.480 | 0.482 | 0.465 | |
| PM5 | 0.349 | 0.365 | 0.343 | 0.345 | |
| SCPEC2 | 0.553 | 0.557 | 0.554 | 0.424 | |
| SCPEC4 | 0.409 | 0.627 | 0.496 | 0.485 | |
| SCPEC5 | 0.391 | 0.606 | 0.504 | 0.470 |
EP, Environmental Protection; PM, Project Management; IR, International Relation; EBU, Economy Boost Up; SSPEC, Project Success (CPEC).
Figure 3Measurement model assessment.
Heterotrait Monotrait (HTMT) ratio.
| EBU | |||||
| EP | 0.593 | ||||
| IR | 0.737 | 0.728 | |||
| PM | 0.697 | 0.684 | 0.727 | ||
| SCPEC | 0.691 | 0.791 | 0.717 | 0.700 |
Hypothesis results (Path Analysis).
| EBU -> SCPEC | 0.200 | 0.037 | 5.368 | 0.000 | 0.120 | 0.266 |
| EBU*PM -> SCPEC | 0.058 | 0.032 | 1.811 | 0.043 | 0.004 | 0.124 |
| EP -> SCPEC | 0.437 | 0.033 | 13.256 | 0.000 | 0.380 | 0.504 |
| EP*PM -> SCPEC | −0.029 | 0.033 | 0.885 | 0.378 | −0.090 | 0.033 |
| IR -> SCPEC | 0.116 | 0.035 | 3.284 | 0.001 | 0.039 | 0.190 |
| IR*PM -> SCPEC | −0.095 | 0.034 | 2.756 | 0.007 | −0.164 | −0.037 |
| PM -> SCPEC | 0.105 | 0.032 | 3.301 | 0.001 | 0.047 | 0.166 |