Literature DB >> 31301863

Combining morphological and biomechanical factors for optimal carotid plaque progression prediction: An MRI-based follow-up study using 3D thin-layer models.

Qingyu Wang1, Dalin Tang2, Liang Wang3, Gador Canton4, Zheyang Wu5, Thomas S Hatsukami6, Kristen L Billiar7, Chun Yuan8.   

Abstract

Plaque progression prediction is of fundamental significance to cardiovascular research and disease diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) data of carotid atherosclerotic plaques were acquired from 20 patients with consent obtained. 3D thin-layer models were constructed to calculate plaque stress and strain. Data for ten morphological and biomechanical risk factors were extracted for analysis. Wall thickness increase (WTI), plaque burden increase (PBI) and plaque area increase (PAI) were chosen as three measures for plaque progression. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with 5-fold cross-validation strategy were used to calculate prediction accuracy and identify optimal predictor. The optimal predictor for PBI was the combination of lumen area (LA), plaque area (PA), lipid percent (LP), wall thickness (WT), maximum plaque wall stress (MPWS) and maximum plaque wall strain (MPWSn) with prediction accuracy = 1.4146 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value is 0.7158), while PA, plaque burden (PB), WT, LP, minimum cap thickness, MPWS and MPWSn was the best for WTI (accuracy = 1.3140, AUC = 0.6552), and a combination of PA, PB, WT, MPWS, MPWSn and average plaque wall strain (APWSn) was the best for PAI with prediction accuracy = 1.3025 (AUC = 0.6657). The combinational predictors improved prediction accuracy by 9.95%, 4.01% and 1.96% over the best single predictors for PAI, PBI and WTI (AUC values improved by 9.78%, 9.45%, and 2.14%), respectively. This suggests that combining both morphological and biomechanical risk factors could lead to better patient screening strategies.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherosclerotic plaque; Carotid artery modeling; Follow-up study; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Plaque progression

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31301863      PMCID: PMC6710108          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  39 in total

1.  A layer-specific three-dimensional model for the simulation of balloon angioplasty using magnetic resonance imaging and mechanical testing.

Authors:  Gerhard A Holzapfel; Michael Stadler; Christian A J Schulze-Bauer
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis and cerebrovascular risk stratification.

Authors:  Andrew N Nicolaides; Stavros K Kakkos; Efthyvoulos Kyriacou; Maura Griffin; Michael Sabetai; Dafydd J Thomas; Thomas Tegos; George Geroulakos; Nicos Labropoulos; Caroline J Doré; Tim P Morris; Ross Naylor; Anne L Abbott
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease: executive summary.

Authors:  John J Ricotta; Ali Aburahma; Enrico Ascher; Mark Eskandari; Peter Faries; Brajesh K Lal
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Identifying which patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis could benefit from intervention.

Authors:  Kosmas I Paraskevas; J David Spence; Frank J Veith; Andrew N Nicolaides
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  In vivo serial MRI-based models and statistical methods to quantify sensitivity and specificity of mechanical predictors for carotid plaque rupture: location and beyond.

Authors:  Zheyang Wu; Chun Yang; Dalin Tang
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Fluid-structure interaction models based on patient-specific IVUS at baseline and follow-up for prediction of coronary plaque progression by morphological and biomechanical factors: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Dalin Tang; Akiko Maehara; Zheyang Wu; Chun Yang; David Muccigrosso; Jie Zheng; Richard Bach; Kristen L Billiar; Gary S Mintz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress.

Authors:  D N Ku; D P Giddens; C K Zarins; S Glagov
Journal:  Arteriosclerosis       Date:  1985 May-Jun

8.  Meshless Generalized Finite Difference Method and Human Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Progression Simulation Using Multi-Year MRI Patient-Tracking Data.

Authors:  Chun Yang; Dalin Tang; Chun Yuan; William Kerwin; Fei Liu; Gador Canton; Thomas S Hatsukami; Satya Atluri
Journal:  Comput Model Eng Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.593

9.  Who benefits most from intervention for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: patients or professionals?

Authors:  A R Naylor; P A Gaines; P M Rothwell
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 7.069

10.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.

Authors:  H J Barnett; D W Taylor; M Eliasziw; A J Fox; G G Ferguson; R B Haynes; R N Rankin; G P Clagett; V C Hachinski; D L Sackett; K E Thorpe; H E Meldrum; J D Spence
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predicting Coronary Stenosis Progression Using Plaque Fatigue From IVUS-Based Thin-Slice Models: A Machine Learning Random Forest Approach.

Authors:  Xiaoya Guo; Akiko Maehara; Mingming Yang; Liang Wang; Jie Zheng; Habib Samady; Gary S Mintz; Don P Giddens; Dalin Tang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  The Differentiation in Image Post-processing and 3D Reconstruction During Evaluation of Carotid Plaques From MR and CT Data Sources.

Authors:  Fengbin Deng; Changping Mu; Ling Yang; Rongqi Yi; Min Gu; Kang Li
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.566

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.