| Literature DB >> 33935416 |
Abdelrahman M Abd El-Gawad1, Diea G Abo El-Hassan2, Ahmed M Aboul-Enein3, Sherein S Abdelgayed4, Salwa A Aly5, Gamal Esmat6, Amr A Mostafa3, Mohamed H Bakr1, Rida A Ali1, Mahmoud A Ayoub7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The major conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers have anticancer effect, especially breast cancer cells, inhibits cell growth and induces cell death. Also, CLA has several health benefits in vivo, including antiatherogenesis, antiobesity, and modulation of immune function. The present study aimed to assess the safety and anticancer effects of milk fat CLA against in vivo Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) in female Swiss albino mice. This was based on acute toxicity study, detection of the tumor growth, life span of EAC bearing hosts, and simultaneous alterations in the hematological, biochemical, and histopathological profiles.Entities:
Keywords: Ehrlich ascites carcinoma % increase in life span; anticancer activity; conjugated linoleic acid; mean survival time; tumor transplanted mice
Year: 2021 PMID: 33935416 PMCID: PMC8076465 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.696-708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Effect of daily oral administration of milk fat rich in CLA on MST and % ILS in EAC inoculated mice.
| Groups | Treatment | MST/days | % ILS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 3 | Positive control (TTM) | 16.5±0.19 | - |
| Group 4 | TTM feed on 50 mg milk fat/mouse (1 mg CLA) daily post-inoculation. | 23.5±0.26 | 42.42 |
| Group 5 | TTM feed on 50 mg milk fat/mouse (1 mg CLA) daily 28 days pre-inoculation. | 25.2±0.35 | 52.73 |
The values expressed as mean±SE, TTM=Tumor transplanted mice with EAC cells,
Significant at (p<0.05) as compared with positive control group (Group 3, TTM). CLA=Conjugated linoleic acid, MST=Mean survival time, EAC=Ehrlich ascites carcinoma, % ILS=Percent increase in life span, TTM=Tumor transplanted mice, MST=Mean survival time
Figure-1Mean survival time/day and percent increase in life span of tumor transplanted mice treated with milk fat rich in conjugated linoleic acid.
Effect of daily oral administration of milk fat rich in CLA on tumor growth in EAC inoculated mice.
| Groups | Treatment | Mean body weights | Tumor growth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W (g) | WI (%) | V ( mL) | VI (%) | |||
| Group 1 | Normal control (mice feed on balanced ration without inoculation) | 24.9±0.3 | - | - | - | - |
| Group 2 | Mice feed on 50 mg milk fat/mouse (1 mg CLA) daily for 28 days without inoculation | 25.0±0.3 | - | - | - | - |
| Group 3 | Positive control (TTM) feed on balanced ration | 30.7±0.1 | 5.8±0.1 | 100.0 | 7.0±0.4 | 100.0 |
| Group 4 | TTM feed on 50 mg milk fat/mouse (1 mg CLA) daily post-inoculation. | 28.6±0.1 | 3.7±0.2 | 36.2 | 4.4±0.2 | 37.1 |
| Group 5 | TTM feed on 50 mg milk fat/mouse (1 mg CLA) daily 28 days pre-inoculation. | 28.1±0.1 | 3.1±0.2 | 46.6 | 3.2±0.1 | 54.3 |
The values expressed as mean±SE, W=Weight, WI=Weight inhibition, V=Volume, VI=Volume inhibition,
Significant at P<0.05 as compared with normal control group (Group 1),
Significant at P<0.05 as compared with EAC group (Group 3). CLA=Conjugated linoleic acid, EAC=Ehrlich ascites carcinoma, TTM=Tumor transplanted mice
Figure-2Tumor growth rate in tumor transplanted mice treated with milk fat rich in conjugated linoleic acid: (a) Weight and volume inhibition percent, (b) viable cell count and percentage of viable cell inhibition.
Effect of daily oral administration of milk fat rich in CLA on viable cell count.
| Groups | Viable cell count (×106) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Viable cell count (Number of tumor cells) | Viable cell count % (Tumor cell growth %) | Viable cells inhibition (I%) (Tumor cells inhibition %) | |
| Group 3 | 330±2 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Group 4 | 216±1 | 65.5 | 34.5 |
| Group 5 | 152±9 | 46.1 | 53.9 |
The values expressed as mean±SE.
Significant at (p<0.05) as compared with positive control group (Group 3, TTM). CLA=Conjugated linoleic acid, TTM=Tumor transplanted mice
Figure-3Effect of daily oral administration of milk fat rich in conjugated linoleic acid on: (a) Red blood cells count, (b) hemoglobin content, and (c) white blood cells count.
Effect of daily oral administration of milk fat rich in CLA on hematological parameters in EAC inoculated Mice.
| Groups | RBC count (106cells/mm3) | Hb (g %) | WBC count (103cells/mm3) | Lymphocytes (%) | Neutrophils (%) | Monocytes (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 5.2±0.1 | 14.5±0.7 | 6.6±0.1 | 69±0.9 | 25.5±0.8 | 1±0.3 |
| Group 2 | 4.9±0.1 | 13.5±0.3 | 6.1±0.1 | 74±0.2 | 26.2±0.4 | 1±0.5 |
| Group 3 | 2.2±0.1 | 8.3±0.2 | 14.2±0.2 | 31.1±1.0 | 55±1.9 | 2±0.6 |
| Group 4 | 3.4±0.1 | 11.6±0.2 | 10.3±0.20 | 48.9±2.1 | 38.2±0.9 | 1.2±0.3 |
| Group 5 | 3.9±0.2 | 12.8±0.3 | 7.6±0.15 | 59.9±1.5 | 27.1±0.7 | 1.1±0.1 |
The values expressed as mean±SE,
Significant at P<0.05 as compared with normal control group (Group 1),
Significant at P<0.05 as compared with EAC group (Group 3). SE=Standard error, CLA=Conjugated linoleic acid, EAC=Ehrlich ascites carcinoma
Figure-4Effect of daily oral administration of milk fat rich in conjugated linoleic acid on: (a) Lymphocytes, (b) neutrophils, and (c) monocytes %.
Activities of ALT, AST, ALP, Creatinine, and TAC in EAC inoculated mice sera after oral administration of milk fat rich in CLA.
| Groups | Treatment | ALT (IU/L) | AST (IU/L) | ALP (IU/L) | Creatinine (mg/DL) | TAC (mm/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Normal mice fed on balanced diet without EAC induction. | 17.87±1.4 | 15.89±1.1 | 37.38±5 | 1.46±0.01 | 1.55±0.11 |
| Group 2 | Normal mice fed on balanced diet supplemented with milk fat CLA without EAC induction | 18.12±1.6 | 16.11±1.2 | 37.51±4 | 1.49±0.02 | 1.82±0.14 |
| Group 3 | TTM fed on normal diet (Cancer control) | 22.78±1.5 | 25.61±2 | 137.92±9 | 3.80±0.08 | 1.04±0.05 |
| Group 4 | TTM fed on balanced diet supplemented with 40 mg/kg milk fat CLA | 19.40±1.3 | 16.20±1 | 56.79±4 | 2.24±0.02 | 1.48±0.12 |
The values expressed as mean±SE,
Significant at P<0.05 as compared with normal control group (Group 1),
Significant at P<0.05 as compared with TTM control group (Group 3). ALT=Aminotransferase, AST=Aspartate aminotransferase, ALP=Alkaline phosphatase, TAC=Total antioxidant capacity, CLA=Conjugated linoleic acid, TTM=Tumor transplanted mice, EAC=Ehrlich ascites carcinoma
Figure-5(a-d) Liver and kidney function tests in sera of Ehrlich ascites carcinoma inoculated mice after oral administration of milk fat rich in conjugated linoleic acid.
Effect of daily oral administration of milk fat rich in CLA on serum proteins (g/DL) in EAC inoculated mice.
| Groups | Total | Albumin | Globulin | A/G ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 5.39±0.1 | 2.85±0.1 | 2.51±0.03 | 1.12±0.05 |
| Group 2 | 5.74±0.2 | 3.01±0.2 | 2.73±0.02 | 1.10±0.04 |
| Group 3 | 3.92±0.1 | 1.41±0.2 | 2.54±0.04 | 0.56±0.04 |
| Group 4 | 5.17±0.1 | 2.64±0.2 | 2.52±0.02 | 1.04±0.01 |
The values expressed as mean±SE,
Significant at (p<0.05) as compared with normal control group (Group 1),
Significant at (p<0.05) as compared with TTM control group (Group 3). CLA=Conjugated linoleic acid, TTM=Tumor transplanted mice, EAC=Ehrlich ascites carcinoma
Figure-6(a) Total proteins and (b) albumin in sera of Ehrlich ascites carcinoma inoculated mice after oral administration of milk fat rich in conjugated linoleic acid.
Figure-7Photomicrograph of mice liver from Groups 1 and 2 (a and b) showing normal histological appearance of liver including central vein, blood sinusoids, hepatic cells, and Kupffer cells. Histological structure of mice liver from Group 3 (c and d) showing enlarged and congested central vein, degenerated hepatocytes (arrow head), infiltration of tumor cells, and leukocytes (arrow). Liver of mice from Group 4 (e) showing mild congested central vein (arrow). Mice liver from Group 5 (f) showing. Nearly normal histological appearance (H and E, 400×).
Figure-8Photomicrograph of mice kidneys from Groups 1 and 2 (a and b) showing normal glomeruli and normal renal tubules. Histological structure of mice kidneys from Group 3 (c and d) showing glomerular atrophy and degenerated renal tubules (arrow head), proteinous casts in the lumen of renal tubules, and infiltration of tumor cells and leukocytes (arrow). Kidneys of mice from Group 4 (e) showing mildly degenerated renal tubules. Mice kidneys from Group 5 (f) showing nearly normal glomeruli and renal tubules, (H and E, 400×).