Literature DB >> 34987623

Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies.

Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez, Paulien Adriaanse, Annette Aldrich, Philippe Berny, Tamara Coja, Sabine Duquesne, Andreas Focks, Marina Marinovich, Maurice Millet, Olavi Pelkonen, Silvia Pieper, Aaldrik Tiktak, Christopher J Topping, Anneli Widenfalk, Martin Wilks, Gerrit Wolterink, Ursula Gundert-Remy, Jochem Louisse, Serge Rudaz, Emanuela Testai, Alfonso Lostia, Jean-Lou Dorne, Juan Manuel Parra Morte.   

Abstract

EFSA asked the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues to deliver a Scientific Opinion on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies for both new active substances and existing ones. The main aim of comparative in vitro metabolism studies of pesticide active substances is to evaluate whether all significant metabolites formed in the human in vitro test system, as a surrogate of the in vivo situation, are also present at comparable level in animal species tested in toxicological studies and, therefore, if their potential toxicity has been appropriately covered by animal studies. The studies may also help to decide which animal model, with regard to a particular compound, is the most relevant for humans. In the experimental strategy, primary hepatocytes in suspension or culture are recommended since hepatocytes are considered the most representative in vitro system for prediction of in vivo metabolites. The experimental design of 3 × 3 × 3 (concentrations, time points, technical replicates, on pooled hepatocytes) will maximise the chance to identify unique (UHM) and disproportionate (DHM) human metabolites. When DHM and UHM are being assessed, test item-related radioactivity recovery and metabolite profile are the most important parameters. Subsequently, structural characterisation of the assigned metabolites is performed with appropriate analytical techniques. In toxicological assessment of metabolites, the uncertainty factor approach is the first alternative to testing option, followed by new approach methodologies (QSAR, read-across, in vitro methods), and only if these fail, in vivo animal toxicity studies may be performed. Knowledge of in vitro metabolites in human and animal hepatocytes would enable toxicological evaluation of all metabolites of concern, and, furthermore, add useful pieces of information for detection and evaluation of metabolites in different matrices (crops, livestock, environment), improve biomonitoring efforts via better toxicokinetic understanding, and ultimately, develop regulatory schemes employing physiologically based or physiology-mimicking in silico and/or in vitro test systems to anticipate the exposure of humans to potentially hazardous substances in plant protection products.
© 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PBK; QSAR; clearance; in silico; interspecies metabolism; reactive metabolites; suspension/plated hepatocytes; xenobiotic

Year:  2021        PMID: 34987623      PMCID: PMC8696562          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  93 in total

1.  Measurement of steroid hydroxylation reactions by high-performance liquid chromatography as indicator of P450 identity and function.

Authors:  M P Arlotto; J M Trant; R W Estabrook
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 2.  Application of cytochrome P450 drug interaction screening in drug discovery.

Authors:  Robert S Foti; Larry C Wienkers; Jan L Wahlstrom
Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.339

3.  Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals.

Authors:  Simon John More; Vasileios Bampidis; Diane Benford; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Claude Bragard; Thorhallur Ingi Halldorsson; Antonio F Hernández-Jerez; Konstantinos Koutsoumanis; Hanspeter Naegeli; Josef R Schlatter; Vittorio Silano; Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Dieter Schrenk; Dominique Turck; Maged Younes; Emilio Benfenati; Laurence Castle; Nina Cedergreen; Anthony Hardy; Ryszard Laskowski; Jean Charles Leblanc; Andreas Kortenkamp; Ad Ragas; Leo Posthuma; Claus Svendsen; Roland Solecki; Emanuela Testai; Bruno Dujardin; George En Kass; Paola Manini; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Jean-Lou Cm Dorne; Christer Hogstrand
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2019-03-25

Review 4.  Approaches in metabolomics for regulatory toxicology applications.

Authors:  Eulalia Olesti; Víctor González-Ruiz; Martin F Wilks; Julien Boccard; Serge Rudaz
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 5.  Evolution of chemical-specific adjustment factors (CSAF) based on recent international experience; increasing utility and facilitating regulatory acceptance.

Authors:  Virunya S Bhat; M E Bette Meek; Mathieu Valcke; Caroline English; Alan Boobis; Richard Brown
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 5.635

6.  Internal threshold of toxicological concern values: enabling route-to-route extrapolation.

Authors:  Falko Partosch; Hans Mielke; Ralf Stahlmann; Burkhard Kleuser; Susan Barlow; Ursula Gundert-Remy
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  In vitro metabolism of [14C]-benalaxyl in hepatocytes of rats, dogs and humans.

Authors:  Gopinath C Nallani; Shaaban F ElNaggar; Li Shen; Appavu Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Inter-species comparison of 7-hydroxycoumarin glucuronidation and sulfation in liver S9 fractions.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Cindy Ye; Richard Jia; Albert J Owen; Ismael J Hidalgo; Jibin Li
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.416

9.  Biology-inspired microphysiological systems to advance patient benefit and animal welfare in drug development

Authors:  Uwe Marx; Takafumi Akabane; Tommy B Andersson; Elizabeth Baker; Mario Beilmann; Sonja Beken; Susanne Brendler-Schwaab; Murat Cirit; Rhiannon David; Eva-Maria Dehne; Isabell Durieux; Lorna Ewart; Suzanne C Fitzpatrick; Olivier Frey; Florian Fuchs; Linda G Griffith; Geraldine A Hamilton; Thomas Hartung; Julia Hoeng; Helena Hogberg; David J Hughes; Donald E Ingber; Anita Iskandar; Toshiyuki Kanamori; Hajime Kojima; Jochen Kuehnl; Marcel Leist; Bo Li; Peter Loskill; Donna L Mendrick; Thomas Neumann; Giorgia Pallocca; Ivan Rusyn; Lena Smirnova; Thomas Steger-Hartmann; Danilo A Tagle; Alexander Tonevitsky; Sergej Tsyb; Martin Trapecar; Bob Van de Water; Janny Van den Eijnden-van Raaij; Paul Vulto; Kengo Watanabe; Armin Wolf; Xiaobing Zhou; Adrian Roth
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 6.043

10.  A Next-Generation Risk Assessment Case Study for Coumarin in Cosmetic Products.

Authors:  Maria T Baltazar; Sophie Cable; Paul L Carmichael; Richard Cubberley; Tom Cull; Mona Delagrange; Matthew P Dent; Sarah Hatherell; Jade Houghton; Predrag Kukic; Hequn Li; Mi-Young Lee; Sophie Malcomber; Alistair M Middleton; Thomas E Moxon; Alexis V Nathanail; Beate Nicol; Ruth Pendlington; Georgia Reynolds; Joe Reynolds; Andrew White; Carl Westmoreland
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Candidate Proficiency Test Chemicals to Address Industrial Chemical Applicability Domains for in vitro Human Cytochrome P450 Enzyme Induction.

Authors:  Miriam Naomi Jacobs; Barbara Kubickova; Eugene Boshoff
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Editorial: Relevance of dog studies for the derivation of health-based guidance values for plant protection products approval.

Authors:  Martina Panzarea; Andrea Terron; Tamara Coja; Olavi Pelkonen
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.