| Literature DB >> 33933166 |
Krishan K Verma1, Xiu-Peng Song1, Chhedi Lal Verma2, Zhong-Liang Chen1,3, Vishnu D Rajput4, Kai-Chao Wu1, Fen Liao1, Gan-Lin Chen5, Yang-Rui Li6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Water stress is one of the serious abiotic stresses that negatively influences the growth, development and production of sugarcane in arid and semi-arid regions. However, silicon (Si) has been applied as an alleviation strategy subjected to environmental stresses.Entities:
Keywords: Bio-modelling; Photosynthetic leaf gas exchange; Silicon; Sugarcane; Water stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33933166 PMCID: PMC8088580 DOI: 10.1186/s40659-021-00338-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Res ISSN: 0716-9760 Impact factor: 7.634
Physio-chemical characteristics of applied soil
| Parameters | Soil texture | Soil pH | Organic carbon (%) | Total N (%) | Available P (mg kg−1) | Available S (mg kg−1) | Exchangeable K (cmol( +)kg−1) | Available Si (mg kg−1) | Available Cu (mg kg−1) | Available Fe (mg kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | Silty-clay | 5.9 | 0.72 | 0.09 | 9.18 | 12.01 | 2.71 | 87.3 | 0.85 | 12.0 |
Atmospheric variable during experiment
| March | April | May | June | July | August | September | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ambient air temperature (ºC) | Maximum | 25.5 | 27.6 | 30.4 | 32.1 | 32.9 | 32.7 | 31.6 |
| Minimum | 15.0 | 19.6 | 22.8 | 24.9 | 25.4 | 25.2 | 23.6 | |
| Mean | 20.3 | 23.6 | 26.6 | 28.5 | 29.2 | 29.0 | 27.6 | |
| Ambient air humidity (%) | Mean | 82 | 81 | 80 | 82 | 82 | 78 | 75 |
| Sunshine (h) | Mean | 12 | 12.7 | 13.2 | 13.5 | 13.4 | 12.9 | 12.3 |
Fig. 1The change of net photosynthetic assimilation rate (Anet—µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) to water stress condition (55–50% soil moisture, moderate, a–d) and different silicon levels (e–h) in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L. cv. GT 42) plants. Average mean values are each point (n = 5). Blue ovals denote the actual values and red lines show the predicted values. Parenthesis values indicate ( +) percent gain. S = standard error and r = correlation coefficient
Fig. 2Response of stomatal conductance to water vapor (gs—mmol H2O m−2 s−1) to water stress condition (55–50% soil moisture, moderate,a–d) and different silicon levels (e–h) in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L. cv. GT 42) plants. Average mean values are each point (n = 5). Blue ovals denote the actual values and red lines show the predicted values. Parenthesis values indicate ( +) percent gain against stress. S = standard error and r = correlation coefficient
Fig. 3Effect of water stress a–d) and different silicon levels (e–h) on the rate of transpiration (mmol H2O m−2 s−1) in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L. cv. GT 42) plants. Average mean values are each point (n = 5). Blue ovals denote the actual values and red lines show the predicted values. Parenthesis values indicate ( +) percent gain against stress. S = standard error and r = correlation coefficient
Model constants of net photosynthetic assimilation rate (Anet), stomatal conductance to water vapour (gs) and rate of transpiration (E) subjected to water stress condition and Si application
| Photosynthetic response | Pm | τ | r | S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 2.214 | 3.335 | 0.999 | 0.212 | |
| 60 | 2.332 | 3.169 | 0.999 | 0.289 | |
| 90 | 2.458 | 3.192 | 0.999 | 0.165 | |
| 120 | 2.620 | 3.131 | 0.999 | 0.409 | |
| gs | 30 | 9.752 | 2.718 | 0.997 | 3.437 |
| 60 | 1.006 | 2.779 | 0.996 | 4.016 | |
| 90 | 1.071 | 2.714 | 0.998 | 2.827 | |
| 120 | 1.108 | 2.943 | 0.998 | 3.631 | |
| E | 30 | 1.310 | 3.660 | 0.999 | 0.018 |
| 60 | 1.364 | 3.502 | 0.999 | 0.023 | |
| 90 | 1.414 | 3.405 | 0.999 | 0.022 | |
| 120 | 1.569 | 3.089 | 0.999 | 0.020 |
Pm and τ Model constants, r Correlation coefficient, S Standard error, and 30, 60, 90 and 120 indicates days of stress
Model constants of net photosynthetic assimilation rate (Anet), stomatal conductance to water vapour (gs) and rate of transpiration (E) to Si application
| Photosynthetic response | Silicon (mg L−1) | σ | ρ | ʎ | r | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 9.889 | 2.411 | 5.158 | 0.991 | 0.224 | |
| 100 | 3.492 | 6.411 | 4.736 | 0.995 | 0.228 | |
| 200 | 4.361 | 5.717 | 3.581 | 0.987 | 0.409 | |
| 500 | 6.441 | 4.383 | 2.151 | 0.999 | 0.018 | |
| gs | 0 | 1.448 | 4.475 | 2.720 | 0.991 | 1.023 |
| 100 | 2.234 | 4.698 | 2.055 | 0.999 | 0.285 | |
| 200 | 1.539 | 6.727 | 3.748 | 0.991 | 1.252 | |
| 500 | 2.009 | 5.518 | 3.417 | 0.984 | 2.125 | |
| E | 0 | 1.264 | 7.762 | 1.718 | 0.993 | 0.006 |
| 100 | 3.070 | 4.860 | 1.511 | 0.999 | 0.006 | |
| 200 | 4.899 | 3.521 | 1.229 | 0.994 | 0.018 | |
| 500 | 5.055 | 3.534 | 1.259 | 0.999 | 0.005 |
σ, ρ and ʎ model constants, r Correlation coefficient, S Standard error, and 0, 100, 200 and 500 mg L−1 indicates Si concentration