| Literature DB >> 33929647 |
Yanru Xing1,2,3, Xi Yang2,3, Haixiao Chen2,3, Sujun Zhu4, Jinjin Xu2,3, Yuan Chen2,3, Juan Zeng4, Fang Chen2,3, Mark Richard Johnson5, Hui Jiang1,2,3,6, Wen-Jing Wang7,8.
Abstract
The expression of human and microbial genes serves as biomarkers for disease and health. Blood RNA is an important biological resource for precision medicine and translational medicine. However, few studies have assessed the human transcriptome profiles and microbial communities composition and diversity of peripheral blood from different cell isolation methods, which could affect the reproducibility of researches. We collected peripheral blood from three healthy donors and processed it immediately. We used RNA sequencing to investigate the effect of three leukocyte isolation methods including buffy coat (BC) extraction, red blood cell (RBC) lysis and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) isolation with the comparison with whole blood (WB), through analyzing the sensitivity of gene detection, the whole transcriptome profiling and microbial composition and diversity. Our data showed that BC extraction with high globin mRNA mapping rate had similar transcriptome profiles with WB, while RBC lysis and PBMC isolation depleted RBCs effectively. With the efficient depletion of RBC and distinct compositions of leukocyte subsets, RNA-seq of RBC lysis and PBMC isolation uniquely detected genes from specific cell types, like granulocytes and NK cells. In addition, we observed that the microbial composition and diversity were more affected by individuals than isolation methods. Our results showed that blood cell isolations could largely influence the sensitivity of detection of human genes and transcriptome profile.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Cell isolation; Microbial transcript; Peripheral blood; Transcriptome profile
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33929647 PMCID: PMC8085658 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-021-06382-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Rep ISSN: 0301-4851 Impact factor: 2.316
Fig. 1Schematic of sample processing. Whole blood was collected in EDTA anticoagulation tubes (n = 3). All samples were treated immediately after collection
Fig. 2Blood cell subsets among WBCs isolations and WB. a Percentage of globin mRNA reads in clean reads. b The relative proportions of neutrophils, monocytes, CD8 cells, CD4 naïve cells, T regulatory cells, and NK cells resting. *Shows p-value < = 0.05
Fig. 3Human gene detected sensitivity. a Sequencing saturation analysis of each pretreatment. b Distribution of all gene expression levels. c Venn diagram showed the overlap of the detected genes by different WBCs isolations and WB. A gene is considered “expressed” in one pretreatment if it has a TPM value of at least 0.3 in all three biology replicates. d Principal component analysis (PCA) according to commonly detected genes expression. e Coefficient of variation for commonly detected genes expression. f Distribution of commonly detected gene and uniquely detected gene expression and g Heatmap of gene expression in 18 cell types. TPM was transformed by log2 (TPM+1)
Fig. 4Human gene expression profile difference among WBCs isolations and WB. a The fold change distribution of DEGs. b Gene dendrogram. The color row underneath the dendrogram shows the module assignment determined by the Dynamic Tree Cut. c Pearson correlation between module eigengene and the pretreatment. The cor (up) and p-value (down) are shown in box. The numbers of coding (left) and non-coding (right) gene are shown in brackets. d Heatmap of genes expression in each sample. TPM was transformed by log2 (TPM + 1). e Distribution of gene expression levels. f Summary of enrichment analysis in DisGeNET. (Color figure online)
Fig. 5The microbial composition and diversity among WBCs isolations and WB. a The microbiome-RPM. b Relative abundances of microbial taxa at phylum level. c Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of microbial communities at the genus level based on unweighted Bray–Curtis distances. Alpha (Simpson index) (d) and beta (Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index) (e) diversity of per sample at the genus level of classification