| Literature DB >> 31139578 |
Diego J Castillo1, Riaan F Rifkin1,2, Don A Cowan1, Marnie Potgieter1.
Abstract
The blood that flows perpetually through our veins and arteries performs numerous functions essential to our survival. Besides distributing oxygen, this vast circulatory system facilitates nutrient transport, deters infection and dispenses heat throughout our bodies. Since human blood has traditionally been considered to be an entirely sterile environment, comprising only blood-cells, platelets and plasma, the detection of microbes in blood was consistently interpreted as an indication of infection. However, although a contentious concept, evidence for the existence of a healthy human blood-microbiome is steadily accumulating. While the origins, identities and functions of these unanticipated micro-organisms remain to be elucidated, information on blood-borne microbial phylogeny is gradually increasing. Given recent advances in microbial-hematology, we review current literature concerning the composition and origin of the human blood-microbiome, focusing on bacteria and their role in the configuration of both the diseased and healthy human blood-microbiomes. Specifically, we explore the ways in which dysbiosis in the supposedly innocuous blood-borne bacterial microbiome may stimulate pathogenesis. In addition to exploring the relationship between blood-borne bacteria and the development of complex disorders, we also address the matter of contamination, citing the influence of contaminants on the interpretation of blood-derived microbial datasets and urging the routine analysis of laboratory controls to ascertain the taxonomic and metabolic characteristics of environmentally-derived contaminant-taxa.Entities:
Keywords: bacteria; contamination; disease; dysbiosis; human blood microbiome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31139578 PMCID: PMC6519389 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Timeline indicating significant advances concerning HBM research. Images modified from Pease (1970), Domingue and Schlegel (1977), Bessis and Delpech (1981), McLaughlin et al. (2002), and Panaiotov et al. (2018).
HBM studies concerning both healthy and diseased human participants.
| One-hundred male and female subjects selected at random. | Cohort consisted of healthy individuals only. | Radioactive uptake of nucleosides and amino acids in erythrocyte suspensions. | Possible presence of mycoplasm-like or L-phase bacterial forms in the bloodstream of overtly healthy individuals. | Fails to report the use of controls. Outdated technology. | Tedeschi et al., |
| Ninety-five diseased patients and 60 healthy individuals. | Bacterial growth observed in 7% of the healthy cohort. | Filtrated blood used to culture bacteria. | Novel bacterial structures seen in blood suggesting bacterial phase before becoming ordinary bacteria. | No biochemical or genetic data in support of morphological observations. | Domingue and Schlegel, |
| Four individuals without clinical signs of disease. | Study population consisted of healthy individuals only. | qPCR including the use of rRNA gene-specific fluorescent probes. | Presence of bacteria from five divisions and 7 distinct phylogenetic groups in the blood of healthy individuals. | Very small ( | Nikkari et al., |
| Twenty-five healthy individuals. | Study population consisted of healthy individuals only. | PCR amplification of 16S rRNA and | Confirms the existence of pleomorphic bacteria in “healthy” blood. Bacteria exhibited limited growth and susceptibility to antibiotics. Sequencing revealed the presence of | Pleomorphic structures could be RBC-derived microparticles. | McLaughlin et al., |
| Two healthy individuals. | Study population consisted of healthy individuals only. | PCR of 16S rRNA gene and Sanger sequencing of different clones. | 16S rRNA genes in “healthy” blood confirmed. Bacteria identified only in clones ( | Very small ( | Moriyama et al., |
| Comprising 3,280 patients from the DESIR study. | Healthy (non-diabetic) patients also presented bacterial DNA in their blood. | Quantification of 16S rRNA gene with broad-range quantification kit and pyro-sequencing. | 16S rRNA gene concentration higher in individuals that developed diabetes. A core blood microbiome, mostly consisting of | Conclusions solely based on the finding of bacterial DNA. | Amar et al., |
| Comprising 3,936 patients from the DESIR study. | Bacterial DNA in blood of individuals not presenting CVD. | 16S rRNA gene qPCR. | Conclusions solely based on the finding of bacterial DNA. | Amar et al., | |
| Eighty CVD patients and 40 healthy individuals. | Healthy control group presented circulating bacterial DNA in their plasma. | 16S rRNA and β globin qPCR and shotgun sequencing of circulating DNA from blood plasma. | Bacterial DNA and microbial diversity higher in CVD group. | Fails to report the use of positive and negative controls. | Dinakaran et al., |
| Fifty type-2 diabetes patients and 50 control individuals. | Bacterial rRNA detected in 4% of healthy individuals (opposed to 28% in diabetes patients). | 16S rRNA RT-qPCR. | Higher detection rate of potential IM bacteria in the blood of patients with type-2 diabetes than in control group. | Fails to report the use of negative and positive controls. | Sato et al., |
| Sixty self-reported healthy individuals older than 49 years. | Bacterial growth observed in 62% of healthy individuals. | Blood suspensions incubated on trypticase soy blood agar (TSA) or blue lactose plates, and identified by 16S rRNA gene colony PCR. | Bacterial growth observed in 35% of RBC fractions and 53% of plasma fractions. | Method unable to detect unculturable bacteria. | Damgaard et al., |
| Thirty healthy blood donors (18 to 53 years old). | Study population consisted of healthy individuals only. | 16S rRNA gene qPCR and 16S targeted metagenomic sequencing (Illumina MiSeq). | Bacterial DNA present in buffy coat, erythrocytes and plasma. Most bacterial DNA corresponds to | Conclusions solely based on the finiding of bacterial DNA. | Païssé et al., |
| Twenty-three healthy individuals and 62 patients with sepsis. | Bacterial DNA found in all samples including 23 healthy individuals. | 16S rRNA gene targeted metagenomic NGS (Illumina MiSeq). | Healthy samples presented higher diversity than sepsis patients. Abundance of | Conclusions solely based on the finiding of bacterial DNA. | Gosiewski et al., |
| Nine cirrhosis patients and 9 healthy individuals (~60 years of age). | Bacteria found in 2 out of the 9 control individuals. | Microbial DNA qPCR (16S rRNA target gene). | Number of bacterial species and amount of bacterial DNA increased in cirrhotic patients. | Very small sample size | Traykova et al., |
| Twenty-one bone marrow transplant-, 59 lung transplant- and 76 heart-transplant patients (32 pregnant participants). | Sequencing reads obtained from all transplant patients and pregnant participants. | Shotgun sequencing of cell-free DNA. Confirmation of novel contigs by direct PCR. | Circulating free-DNA from novel uncharacterized bacteria and viruses that could be members of the human IM found in the blood of all participants. | Conclusions solely based on the finiding of bacterial DNA. | Kowarsky et al., |
| Fifty patients with severe acute pancreatitis and 12 healthy individuals. | Bacterial DNA found in all healthy participants. | 16S rDNA gene qPCR and targeted metagenomic sequencing using Ion Torrent. | Higher number of 16S rDNA gene copies in patients. Healthy phyla include | Small samples size ( | Li et al., |
| Twenty-eight blood samples from healthy individuals. | All blood samples were culture positive (confirmed by gram staining and TEM). | 16S rRNA genes and ITS2 targeted sequencing on Illumina MiSeq and TEM. | Cultural isolation and characterization of the blood- microbiome of healthy individuals. | Fails to report the use of negative and positive controls. | Panaiotov et al., |
| Comprising 192 individuals (48 with schizophrenia, 47 with lateral sclerosis, 48 with bipolar disorder and 49 healthy). | Bacterial transcripts identified in blood samples from healthy individuals. | High throughput RNA sequencing. | Prevalent phyla across study groups were | RNA analyses does not confirm all blood-borne icroorganisms. | Loohuis et al., |
| Ten participants: five healthy subjects and five suffering from asthma.All women | Bacterial DNA and RNA in blood of all healthy individuals. | 16S rRNA gene sequencing. | From DNA and RNA analysis, most abundant phyla were | Small sample size ( | Whittle et al., |
| Fifty patients suffering from diabetes type two, and 100 healthy control individuals | Bacterial DNA found in all healthy participants. | 16S rRNA genes targeted sequencing on Illumina MiSeq. | Participants that carried the genus | Conclusions solely based on the finiding of bacterial DNA. | Qiu et al., |
We emphasize the detection of bacteria in the blood of healthy human cohorts.