Literature DB >> 7892921

Physician characteristics associated with decisions to withdraw life support.

N A Christakis1, D A Asch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to identify attributes of physicians associated with physicians' decisions to withdraw life support.
METHODS: Of the 862 Pennsylvania internists surveyed and asked to make decisions in response to hypothetical vignettes and to report their actual experience with the withdrawal of life support, 485 (56%) responded. The data were analyzed with regression models.
RESULTS: With other factors controlled, physicians were more willing to withdraw life support if they were young, practiced in a tertiary care setting, or spent more time in clinical practice; they were less willing if they were Catholic or Jewish. Physicians reported a higher frequency of actually withdrawing life support if they were young, had more contact with ICU patients, spent more time in clinical practice, or were specialists. Physicians with a greater willingness to withdraw were more likely to report having done so.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' personal characteristics are associated with both their preferences and their practice in the withdrawal of life support, and a greater willingness to withdraw is associated with a higher frequency of withdrawal. The influence of physician characteristics demonstrates that patient preferences and clinical circumstances do not exclusively govern such ethical decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7892921      PMCID: PMC1614871          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.85.3.367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  18 in total

1.  Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill.

Authors:  N G Smedira; B H Evans; L S Grais; N H Cohen; B Lo; M Cooke; W P Schecter; C Fink; E Epstein-Jaffe; C May
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Physicians' attitudes toward using deception to resolve difficult ethical problems.

Authors:  D H Novack; B J Detering; R Arnold; L Forrow; M Ladinsky; J C Pezzullo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Physicians' attitudes on advance directives.

Authors:  K W Davidson; C Hackler; D R Caradine; R S McCord
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Sociologic influences on decision-making by clinicians.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Variability in physician bioethical decision-making. A case study of euthanasia.

Authors:  R A Pearlman; T S Inui; W B Carter
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Ethical dilemmas for house staff physicians. The care of critically ill and dying patients.

Authors:  W Winkenwerder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-12-27       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Perceived quality of life and preferences for life-sustaining treatment in older adults.

Authors:  R F Uhlmann; R A Pearlman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-03

Review 8.  Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications.

Authors:  L J Schneiderman; N S Jecker; A R Jonsen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  The do-not-resuscitate order in teaching hospitals.

Authors:  A L Evans; B A Brody
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Patients' and families' preferences for medical intensive care.

Authors:  M Danis; D L Patrick; L I Southerland; M L Green
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  44 in total

1.  Physicians' disagreements about life-sustaining treatments: a case study.

Authors:  L J Gordon; A H Weiss
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1999-06

2.  Factors affecting physicians' decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatments in terminal care.

Authors:  H Hinkka; E Kosunen; R Metsänoja; U-K Lammi; P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Determinants of treatment intensity for patients with serious illness: a new conceptual framework.

Authors:  Amy S Kelley; R Sean Morrison; Neil S Wenger; Susan L Ettner; Catherine A Sarkisian
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  To die, to sleep: US physicians' religious and other objections to physician-assisted suicide, terminal sedation, and withdrawal of life support.

Authors:  Farr A Curlin; Chinyere Nwodim; Jennifer L Vance; Marshall H Chin; John D Lantos
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Religion and United States physicians' opinions and self-predicted practices concerning artificial nutrition and hydration.

Authors:  Kelly M Wolenberg; John D Yoon; Kenneth A Rasinski; Farr A Curlin
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2013-12

6.  Predictors of Advance Care Planning in Older Women: The Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  Jae H Kang; Julie P W Bynum; Lu Zhang; Francine Grodstein; David G Stevenson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Can curative or life-sustaining treatment be withheld or withdrawn? The opinions and views of Indian palliative-care nurses and physicians.

Authors:  Joris Gielen; Sushma Bhatnagar; Seema Mishra; Arvind K Chaturvedi; Harmala Gupta; Ambika Rajvanshi; Stef Van den Branden; Bert Broeckaert
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2011-02

8.  Social values as an independent factor affecting end of life medical decision making.

Authors:  Charles J Cohen; Yifat Chen; Hedi Orbach; Yossi Freier-Dror; Gail Auslander; Gabriel S Breuer
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-02

9.  Attitudes of health care trainees about genetics and disability: issues of access, health care communication, and decision making.

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond; Carol J Gill; Patrick Semik; Kristi L Kirschner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  The world's major religions' points of view on end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Hans-Henrik Bülow; Charles L Sprung; Konrad Reinhart; Shirish Prayag; Bin Du; Apostolos Armaganidis; Fekri Abroug; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.