Literature DB >> 33925749

Diagnostic Performance of Conventional X-ray for Detecting Foreign Bodies in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis.

Ta-Wei Yang1,2, Yi-Chung Yu3,4, Yen-Yue Lin1,2, Shih-Chang Hsu3,4, Karen Chia-Wen Chu3,4, Chin-Wang Hsu3,4, Chyi-Huey Bai5, Cheng-Kuang Chang6, Yuan-Pin Hsu3,4,7.   

Abstract

Foreign body (FB) ingestion is a common clinical problem in acute settings. Detecting FBs in the upper digestive tract is challenging. The conventional X-ray is usually the first-line imaging tool to detect FBs. However, its diagnostic performance is inconsistent in the literature. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of the conventional X-ray for detecting FBs in the upper digestive tract. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus until 1 August 2020. Prospective or retrospective studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of conventional X-rays for detecting FBs in the upper digestive tract in patients of all ages were included. The Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy-2 tool was used to review the quality of included studies. We used a bivariate random-effects model to calculate diagnostic accuracy parameters. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. We included 17 studies (n = 4809) in the meta-analysis. Of the 17 studies, most studies were rated as having a high risk of bias. Conventional X-rays had a pooled sensitivity of 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.36-0.77, I2 = 98.52) and a pooled specificity of 0.94 (95% CI = 0.87-0.98, I2 = 94.49) for detecting FBs in the upper digestive tract. The heterogeneity was considerable. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.91 (95% CI = 0.88-0.93). Deek's funnel plot asymmetry test results revealed no significant publication bias (p = 0.41). The overall sensitivity and specificity of conventional X-rays were low and high, respectively, for detecting FBs in the upper digestive tract. Hence, conventional X-rays to exclude patients without upper FBs in the digestive tract are not recommended. Further imaging or endoscopic examinations should be performed for at-risk patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fish bone; foreign bodies; plain radiography; upper digestive tract

Year:  2021        PMID: 33925749     DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-4418


  27 in total

1.  Complications of foreign bodies in the esophagus.

Authors:  K S Loh; L K Tan; J D Smith; K H Yeoh; F Dong
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Risk factors predicting the development of complications after foreign body ingestion.

Authors:  A T Y Lai; T L Chow; D T Y Lee; S P Y Kwok
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Foreign bodies.

Authors:  Tim B Hunter; Mihra S Taljanovic
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Diagnostic Accuracy Of Plain X-Ray Lateral Neck In The Diagnosis Of Cervical Esophageal Foreign Bodies Keeping Oesophagoscopy As Gold Standard.

Authors:  Sohail Ahmad Malik; Ihsan Ahmad Qureshi; Raza Muhammad
Journal:  J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  Swallowed foreign bodies in adults.

Authors:  Peter Ambe; Sebastian A Weber; Mathias Schauer; Wolfram T Knoefel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 6.  Foreign Bodies on Lateral Neck Radiographs in Adults: Imaging Findings and Common Pitfalls.

Authors:  Alba Castán Senar; Laura E Dinu; José M Artigas; Raquel Larrosa; Ylenia Navarro; Elena Angulo
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  What predictive parameters best indicate the need for emergent gastrointestinal endoscopy after foreign body ingestion?

Authors:  C Ciriza; L García; P Suárez; C Jiménez; M J Romero; O Urquiza; S Dajil
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 8.  Pediatric foreign bodies and their management.

Authors:  Marsha Kay; Robert Wyllie
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-06

9.  QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Penny F Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Marie E Westwood; Susan Mallett; Jonathan J Deeks; Johannes B Reitsma; Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan A C Sterne; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.