BACKGROUND: Foreign-body ingestion is a common event most often seen in children from 6 months to 6 years of age. In adults, foreign bodies are usually ingested accidentally together with food. This happens more commonly in persons with certain pathological changes of the gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: We present a selective review of pertinent literature retrieved by a search in the PubMed database. RESULTS: The foreign bodies most commonly ingested by adults are fish bones and chicken bones. The clinical approach to the problem depends on the type of material ingested and on the patient's symptoms and physical findings. In about 80% of cases, the ingested material passes uneventfully through the gastrointestinal tract; endoscopy is performed in about 20% of cases, and surgery in less than 1%. Emergency esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is recommended when the esophagus is completely occluded (because of the risk of aspiration and/or pressure necrosis), when the ingested object has a sharp point or edge (because of the risk of perforation, with ensuing mediastinitis or peritonitis), and when a battery has been ingested (because of the risk of necrosis and fistula formation). For non-occluding esophageal foreign bodies, including magnets, an urgent but non-emergency EGD within 12 to 24 hours is recommended. CONCLUSION: Most patients can be treated conservatively by observation alone, but there should be a low threshold for deciding to proceed to endoscopic retrieval. Surgery is reserved for complicated cases.
BACKGROUND: Foreign-body ingestion is a common event most often seen in children from 6 months to 6 years of age. In adults, foreign bodies are usually ingested accidentally together with food. This happens more commonly in persons with certain pathological changes of the gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: We present a selective review of pertinent literature retrieved by a search in the PubMed database. RESULTS: The foreign bodies most commonly ingested by adults are fish bones and chicken bones. The clinical approach to the problem depends on the type of material ingested and on the patient's symptoms and physical findings. In about 80% of cases, the ingested material passes uneventfully through the gastrointestinal tract; endoscopy is performed in about 20% of cases, and surgery in less than 1%. Emergency esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is recommended when the esophagus is completely occluded (because of the risk of aspiration and/or pressure necrosis), when the ingested object has a sharp point or edge (because of the risk of perforation, with ensuing mediastinitis or peritonitis), and when a battery has been ingested (because of the risk of necrosis and fistula formation). For non-occluding esophageal foreign bodies, including magnets, an urgent but non-emergency EGD within 12 to 24 hours is recommended. CONCLUSION: Most patients can be treated conservatively by observation alone, but there should be a low threshold for deciding to proceed to endoscopic retrieval. Surgery is reserved for complicated cases.
Authors: Glenn M Eisen; Todd H Baron; Jason A Dominitz; Douglas O Faigel; Jay L Goldstein; John F Johanson; J Shawn Mallery; Hareth M Raddawi; John J Vargo; J Patrick Waring; Robert D Fanelli; Jo Wheeler-Harbough Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Steven O Ikenberry; Terry L Jue; Michelle A Anderson; Vasundhara Appalaneni; Subhas Banerjee; Tamir Ben-Menachem; G Anton Decker; Robert D Fanelli; Laurel R Fisher; Norio Fukami; M Edwyn Harrison; Rajeev Jain; Khalid M Khan; Mary Lee Krinsky; John T Maple; Ravi Sharaf; Laura Strohmeyer; Jason A Dominitz Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: S Mosca; G Manes; R Martino; L Amitrano; V Bottino; A Bove; A Camera; C De Nucci; G Di Costanzo; M Guardascione; F Lampasi; S Picascia; F P Picciotto; E Riccio; V P Rocco; G Uomo; A Balzano Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: E Marco De Lucas; P Sádaba; P Lastra García-Barón; M L Ruiz-Delgado; F González Sánchez; A Ortiz; M A Pagola Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 1.990