| Literature DB >> 33925699 |
Pei-Ti Hsu1, Jeu-Jung Chen2, Ya-Fang Ho3.
Abstract
A scarcity in the intake of dairy products in older women begets a wide range of musculoskeletal problems, especially osteoporosis. However, dairy products are often not consumed in sufficient quantities in Eastern societies. This study used empowerment education to improve daily dairy intake in 68 older Asian women in the community through a quasi-experimental study design. The 34 participants in the experimental group took part in empowerment education programs that included lectures, sharing sessions, situation dramas, and cooking activities, for two hours per week for 6 weeks. The 34 participants in the control group had no interventions. The generalized estimating equation was used to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness. The test was conducted for the two groups at 1 and 12 weeks after the completion of the lessons. We used daily dairy intake self-efficacy, intention, and behavior scale to measure the outcome. The change in the experimental group's daily dairy intake self-efficacy and intention score at post-1 week and post-12 weeks was higher compared to the control group, but the dairy intake behavior was only changed at post-12 weeks. The empowerment education was effective in encouraging older women to change their dairy intake behavior and improved their dairy intake self-efficacy and intentions.Entities:
Keywords: Asian; community; dairy intake behavior; empowerment; older women
Year: 2021 PMID: 33925699 PMCID: PMC8124786 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094659
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Empowerment education program.
| Lesson | Empowerment Principle | Strategy | Education Program Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st week | Awareness awakening | Dialogue and reflection | Keeping osteoporosis away Introduction. Lecture: Symptoms and disease process of osteoporosis, and prevention strategies. Discuss individual modifiable risk factors. Sharing sessions. |
| 2nd week | Awareness awakening | Dialogue and reflection | Drink more milk to stay healthy Introduction. Lecture: Calcium containing foods, and benefits of calcium foods, effects on bone. Discuss dairy product intake. Sharing sessions. |
| 3rd week | Awareness awakening | Group motivation | Cheering for your friends, and yourself Introduction. Participants share life experiences. Jointly develop dairy product intake plans and goals. The group listens and provides advice. Sharing sessions. |
| 4th week | Open communication | Group motivation | I’m a detective Introduction. Situation drama: detective role simulation, allowing participants to find out dietary problems and conduct group discussions. Discuss dairy product intake plans and provides advice. Sharing sessions. |
| 5th week | Open communication | Group motivation | My dairy products, my decision Introduction. Cooking activity: participants make dairy products together and share recipes. Discuss dairy product intake plans and provide advice. Sharing sessions. |
| 6th week | Open communication | Group motivation | Carrying on with my efforts Introduction. Personal sharing of dairy product intake plans and goals. The group listens and provides advice. Sharing sessions. |
Figure 1Flow diagram.
Summary of personal characteristics by group in the baseline (n = 68).
| Variables | Experimental ( | Control ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 74.3 (9.8) | 76.9 (2.1) | −0.88 | 0.37 | ||
|
| 8.63 | 0.07 | ||||
| Single | 5 (14.7) | 1 (2.9) | ||||
| Married | 25 (73.5) | 28 (82.4) | ||||
| Divorced or widowed | 4 (1.2) | 5 (14.7) | ||||
|
| 4.75 | 0.57 | ||||
| Literate | 4 (11.8) | 2 (5.9) | ||||
| Elementary school | 14 (41.2) | 13 (38.2) | ||||
| Junior high school | 2 (5.9) | 6 (17.6) | ||||
| Senior high school | 9 (26.5) | 10 (29.4) | ||||
| Junior college or higher | 5 (14.6) | 3 (8.8) | ||||
|
| 6.25 | 0.10 | ||||
| Living with children | 14 (41.2) | 17 (50) | ||||
| Living with spouse | 6 (17.6) | 11 (32.4) | ||||
| Living alone | 14 (41.2) | 6 (17.6) | ||||
|
| 2.38 | 0.49 | ||||
| Poor | 3 (8.8) | 3 (8.8) | ||||
| Average | 15 (44.1) | 21 (61.8) | ||||
| Sufficiently well off | 16 (47.1) | 10 (29.4) | ||||
|
| 3.11 | 0.53 | ||||
| Unhealthy | 6 (17.6) | 8 (23.5) | ||||
| Average | 16 (47.1) | 11 (32.4) | ||||
| Healthy | 12 (35.3) | 15 (44.1) | ||||
|
| 16.5 (5.7) | 15.8 (5.8) | 0.52 | 0.59 | ||
|
| 24.3 (1.6) | 23.4 (2.2) | 1.96 | 0.06 | ||
|
| 8.8 (3.3) | 9.2 (3.9) | −0.50 | 0.61 | ||
|
| 10.6 (3.6) | 10.4 (3.4) | 0.20 | 0.83 | ||
| 6.8 (9.6) | 4.4 (8.1) | 1.09 | 0.27 | |||
ESS: Emotional social support; MNA: Mini Nutritional Assessment.
The two groups’ outcome variables at pretest, post-1 week, and post-12 weeks (n = 68).
| Variables | Dairy Intake Self-Efficacy | Dairy Intake Intention | Dairy Intake Behavior | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | SE |
| Beta | SE |
| Beta | SE |
| |
| Experimental | |||||||||
| T1 vs. T0 | 2.79 | 0.60 | <0.001 | 1.27 | 0.43 | 0.004 | 2.47 | 1.07 | 0.021 |
| T2 vs. T0 | 3.53 | 0.66 | <0.001 | 1.59 | 0.50 | 0.002 | 4.29 | 1.33 | <0.001 |
| Control | |||||||||
| T1 vs. T0 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.248 | −0.38 | 0.42 | 0.358 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.306 |
| T2 vs. T0 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.476 | −0.32 | 0.50 | 0.514 | 0.18 | 0.32 | 0.579 |
T0: pretest; T1: post-1 week; T2: post-12 week; SE: standard error; the reference group is the pretest (T0).
Intergroup differences in outcome variables (n = 68).
| Variables | Dairy Intake Self-Efficacy | Dairy Intake Intention | Dairy Intake Behavior | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | SE |
| Beta | SE |
| Beta | SE |
| |
| Group E vs. C | −0.44 | 0.86 | 0.60 | 0.17 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 2.35 | 2.12 | 0.26 |
| Time | |||||||||
| T1 vs. T0 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.24 | −0.38 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.30 |
| T2 vs. T0 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.47 | −0.32 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.17 | 0.31 | 0.57 |
| Group * Time | |||||||||
| Group * (T1 vs. T0) | 2.70 | 0.60 | <0.001 | 1.64 | 0.60 | <0.01 | 2.14 | 1.11 | 0.054 |
| Group * (T2 vs. T0) | 3.47 | 0.66 | <0.001 | 1.91 | 0.70 | <0.01 | 4.11 | 1.36 | <0.01 |
E: experimental group; C: control group; T0: pretest; T1: post-1 week; T2: post-12 week; SE: standard error; the reference group is the control group and pretest (T0); Group * Time: Interaction effect, the meaning of the interaction is {(experimental group post-test—pretest)—(control group post-test—pretest)} which is the comparison of the improvement range between the two groups.