Literature DB >> 33925579

Short-Term Annoyance Due to Night-Time Road, Railway, and Air Traffic Noise: Role of the Noise Source, the Acoustical Metric, and Non-Acoustical Factors.

Sarah Weidenfeld1,2, Sandra Sanok1, Rolf Fimmers3, Marie-Therese Puth3, Daniel Aeschbach1,4,5, Eva-Maria Elmenhorst1,2.   

Abstract

Field studies on traffic noise-induced annoyance have predominantly used estimated outside noise levels. We intended to complement existing knowledge with exposure-response relationships that are based on precise indoor noise measurements. Acoustic recordings inside the bedrooms of nightly road traffic and annoyance ratings in the following morning were obtained from 40 suburban residents (mean age 29.1 years ± 11.7; 26 females). We derived exposure-response functions for the probability to be "annoyed at least a little" (%LA). Further analyses compared data from the current study with those from two earlier studies on railway and aircraft noise. Annoyance increased with the number of traffic events and the equivalent sound pressure level. The inclusion of non-acoustical factors (such as assessment of road transport) improved the prediction considerably. When comparing the different traffic noise sources, %LA was higher for road than for air traffic at a given LAeq,night, but higher for road and railway than for air traffic at a given number of noise events. Acoustical as well as non-acoustical factors impact short-term annoyance induced by road, railway, and air traffic. Annoyance varies across noise sources, which may be due to differences in acoustical characteristics or in the temporal noise distribution throughout the night.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LAeq; aircraft noise; annoyance; exposure–response curve; field study; number of events; railway noise; road traffic noise

Year:  2021        PMID: 33925579     DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  17 in total

Review 1.  WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review of Transport Noise Interventions and Their Impacts on Health.

Authors:  Alan Lex Brown; Irene van Kamp
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise.

Authors:  H M Miedema; H Vos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Annoyance caused by sounds of wheeled and tracked vehicles.

Authors:  N J Versfeld; J Vos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Short-term annoyance from nocturnal aircraft noise exposure: results of the NORAH and STRAIN sleep studies.

Authors:  Julia Quehl; Uwe Müller; Franco Mendolia
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A critical load for nocturnal high-density road traffic noise.

Authors:  B Griefahn
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Annoyance and self-reported sleep disturbance due to night-time railway noise examined in the field.

Authors:  Sibylle Pennig; Julia Quehl; Uwe Mueller; Vinzent Rolny; Hartmut Maass; Mathias Basner; Eva-Maria Elmenhorst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Road-traffic noise and factors influencing noise annoyance in an urban population.

Authors:  Branko Jakovljevic; Katarina Paunovic; Goran Belojevic
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 9.621

9.  Noise annoyance--a modifier of the association between noise level and cardiovascular health?

Authors:  Wolfgang Babisch; Göran Pershagen; Jenny Selander; Danny Houthuijs; Oscar Breugelmans; Ennio Cadum; Federica Vigna-Taglianti; Klea Katsouyanni; Alexandros S Haralabidis; Konstantina Dimakopoulou; Panayota Sourtzi; Sarah Floud; Anna L Hansell
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Differences between Outdoor and Indoor Sound Levels for Open, Tilted, and Closed Windows.

Authors:  Barbara Locher; André Piquerez; Manuel Habermacher; Martina Ragettli; Martin Röösli; Mark Brink; Christian Cajochen; Danielle Vienneau; Maria Foraster; Uwe Müller; Jean Marc Wunderli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  2 in total

1.  Influencing Factors Identification and Prediction of Noise Annoyance-A Case Study on Substation Noise.

Authors:  Guoqing Di; Yihang Wang; Yao Yao; Jiangang Ma; Jian Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Effects of Nocturnal Aircraft Noise and Non-Acoustical Factors on Short-Term Annoyance in Primary School Children.

Authors:  Julia Quehl; Susanne Bartels; Rolf Fimmers; Daniel Aeschbach
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.