Literature DB >> 33924839

On the Questionable Appeal of Glossy/Shiny Food Packaging.

Charles Spence1.   

Abstract

Those stimuli that have a shiny/glossy visual appearance are typically rated as both attractive and attention capturing. Indeed, for millennia, shiny precious metals and glossy lacquerware have been used to enhance the presentation, and thus the perception, of food and drink. As such, one might have expected that adding a shiny/glossy appearance/finish to the outer packaging of food and beverage products would also be desirable. However, the latest research appears to show that many consumers have internalised an association between glossy packaging and greasy (or unhealthy) food products, while matte packaging tends to be associated with those foods that are more natural instead. Furthermore, it turns out that many consumers do not necessarily appreciate the attempt to capture their attention that glossy packaging so often affords. At the same time, it is important to recognise that somewhat different associations may apply in the case of inner versus outer food and beverage packaging. Shiny metallic (inner) packaging may well prime (rightly or wrongly) concerns about sustainability amongst consumers. Given the research that has been published in recent years, food and beverage manufacturers/marketers should think very carefully about whether or not to introduce such shiny/glossy finishes to their packaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolutionary explanations; glossy; inner; learned associations; material properties; outer; packaging; shiny

Year:  2021        PMID: 33924839     DOI: 10.3390/foods10050959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foods        ISSN: 2304-8158


  36 in total

1.  Visual perception of materials and surfaces.

Authors:  Barton L Anderson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  The brain tracks the energetic value in food images.

Authors:  Ulrike Toepel; Jean-François Knebel; Julie Hudry; Johannes le Coutre; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  The perception of gloss: a review.

Authors:  A C Chadwick; R W Kentridge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.

Authors:  A Treisman; S Gormican
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  Neural Mechanisms of Material Perception: Quest on Shitsukan.

Authors:  Hidehiko Komatsu; Naokazu Goda
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Evaluation of energy density and macronutrients after extremely brief time exposure.

Authors:  Kosuke Motoki; Toshiki Saito; Shinsuke Suzuki; Motoaki Sugiura
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Visual appearance of matte surfaces.

Authors:  S K Nayar; M Oren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  "Yummy" versus "Yucky"! Explicit and implicit approach-avoidance motivations towards appealing and disgusting foods.

Authors:  Betina Piqueras-Fiszman; Alexandra A Kraus; Charles Spence
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  The Visual Perception of Material Properties Affects Motor Planning in Prehension: An Analysis of Temporal and Spatial Components of Lifting Cups.

Authors:  Kristín Ósk Ingvarsdóttir; Christian Balkenius
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-02-18

10.  If painters give you lemons, squeeze the knowledge out of them. A study on the visual perception of the translucent and juicy appearance of citrus fruits in paintings.

Authors:  Francesca Di Cicco; Maarten W A Wijntjes; Sylvia C Pont
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Visual communication via the design of food and beverage packaging.

Authors:  Charles Spence; George Van Doorn
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-05-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.