Literature DB >> 25448119

The perception of gloss: a review.

A C Chadwick1, R W Kentridge2.   

Abstract

Gloss is a relatively little studied visual property of objects' surfaces. The earliest recorded scientific reference to gloss appears to have been by Ingersoll in 1921: studies at this time were based on the assumption that gloss could be understood as an inherent physical property of a surface, and the priority was to devise a satisfactory method and scale to measure it reliably. As awareness of the complexity of perception grew, efforts were made to distinguish different types of gloss, although these generally still took the form of a search for objective physical measures to be solved within the visual system by means of inverse optics. It became more widely recognised approximately 20 years ago that models of gloss perception based on inverse optics were intractable and failed to explain experimental findings adequately. A temporary decline in the number of published studies followed; however the last decade or so has seen a renewal of interest in the perception of gloss, in an effort to map what is now understood to be a complex interaction of variables including illumination, surface properties and observer. This appears to have been driven by a number of factors, as the study of gloss re-emerged from research into other surface properties such as colour and texture, with technological advances paving the way for new experimental techniques and measurements. This review describes the main strands of research, tracking the changes in approach and theory which have triggered new avenues of research, to the current state of knowledge.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Gloss; Materials; Perception; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25448119     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  Evaluation of Different Polishing Systems and Speeds for Dental Zirconia.

Authors:  Ramakiran Chavali; Chee Paul Lin; Nathaniel C Lawson
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Beyond scattering and absorption: Perceptual unmixing of translucent liquids.

Authors:  Alice C Chadwick; George Cox; Hannah E Smithson; Robert W Kentridge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  On the Questionable Appeal of Glossy/Shiny Food Packaging.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-28

4.  Touch influences perceived gloss.

Authors:  Wendy J Adams; Iona S Kerrigan; Erich W Graf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Motion of glossy objects does not promote separation of lighting and surface colour.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Hannah E Smithson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  The dress and individual differences in the perception of surface properties.

Authors:  Christoph Witzel; J Kevin O'Regan; Sabrina Hansmann-Roth
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Increasing the Complexity of the Illumination May Reduce Gloss Constancy.

Authors:  Gunnar Wendt; Franz Faul
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-12-09

8.  Can Color and Motion Information Be Used to Disentangle the Influence of Multiple Light Sources on Gloss Perception?

Authors:  Gunnar Wendt; Franz Faul
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-10-10

9.  Human visual cortical responses to specular and matte motion flows.

Authors:  Tae-Eui Kam; Damien J Mannion; Seong-Whan Lee; Katja Doerschner; Daniel J Kersten
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Discrimination of spectral reflectance under environmental illumination.

Authors:  Takuma Morimoto; Hannah E Smithson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.