Literature DB >> 33923595

Adult Users of the Oticon Medical Neuro Cochlear Implant System Benefit from Beamforming in the High Frequencies.

Bianca Bastos Cordeiro1, Marcos Roberto Banhara2, Carlos Maurício Cardeal Mendes1, Fabiana Danieli3, Ariane Laplante-Lévesque4,5, Chadlia Karoui6, Michel Hoen6, Marine Ardoint6, Fanny Gauvrit7,8, Romane Demullier7,8, Christophe Vincent7,8.   

Abstract

The Oticon Medical Neuro cochlear implant system includes the modes Opti Omni and Speech Omni, the latter providing beamforming (i.e., directional selectivity) in the high frequencies. Two studies compared sentence identification scores of adult cochlear implant users with Opti Omni and Speech Omni. In Study 1, a double-blind longitudinal crossover study, 12 new users trialed Opti Omni or Speech Omni (random allocation) for three months, and their sentence identification in quiet and noise (+10 dB signal-to-noise ratio) with the trialed mode were measured. The same procedure was repeated for the second mode. In Study 2, a single-blind study, 11 experienced users performed a speech identification task in quiet and at relative signal-to-noise ratios ranging from -3 to +18 dB with Opti Omni and Speech Omni. The Study 1 scores in quiet and in noise were significantly better with Speech Omni than with Opti Omni. Study 2 scores were significantly better with Speech Omni than with Opti Omni at +6 and +9 dB signal-to-noise ratios. Beamforming in the high frequencies, as implemented in Speech Omni, leads to improved speech identification in medium levels of background noise, where cochlear implant users spend most of their day.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beamforming; cochlear implants; directional microphones; speech identification in quiet and in noise

Year:  2021        PMID: 33923595     DOI: 10.3390/audiolres11020016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Res        ISSN: 2039-4330


  26 in total

1.  Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.

Authors:  Ann Spriet; Lieselot Van Deun; Kyriaky Eftaxiadis; Johan Laneau; Marc Moonen; Bas van Dijk; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Effects of directional microphone and adaptive multichannel noise reduction algorithm on cochlear implant performance.

Authors:  King Chung; Fan-Gang Zeng; Kyle N Acker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Sentence recognition in noise: Variables in compilation and interpretation of tests.

Authors:  Marianne Theunissen; De Wet Swanepoel; Johan Hanekom
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Nathalie Mathias; Jonathan Flament; Dorith Amar; Amelie Liagre-Callies; Stephanie Borel; Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan; Olivier Sterkers; Daniele Bernardeschi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Speech audiometry in noise: Development of the French-language VRB (vocale rapide dans le bruit) test.

Authors:  F Leclercq; C Renard; C Vincent
Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.080

6.  Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Sophia E Kramer; Mark A Eckert; Brent Edwards; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Larry E Humes; Ulrike Lemke; Thomas Lunner; Mohan Matthen; Carol L Mackersie; Graham Naylor; Natalie A Phillips; Michael Richter; Mary Rudner; Mitchell S Sommers; Kelly L Tremblay; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Pupillometry Assessment of Speech Recognition and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Francesca Yoshie Russo; Michel Hoen; Chadlia Karoui; Thomas Demarcy; Marine Ardoint; Maria-Pia Tuset; Daniele De Seta; Olivier Sterkers; Ghizlène Lahlou; Isabelle Mosnier
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 9.  Single and multiple microphone noise reduction strategies in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Behnam Azimi; Yi Hu; David R Friedland
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-08-23

10.  Clinical evaluation of the Nucleus 6 cochlear implant system: performance improvements with SmartSound iQ.

Authors:  Stefan J Mauger; Chris D Warren; Michelle R Knight; Michael Goorevich; Esti Nel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.