Literature DB >> 33922523

In Vitro Assessment of the Effect of Implant Position on Biomechanical Behaviors of Implant-Supported Removable Partial Dentures in Kennedy Class II Condition.

Masafumi Kihara1, Yoichiro Ogino2, Yasuyuki Matsushita1, Takehiro Morita3, Yoshinori Sawae3, Yasunori Ayukawa1, Kiyoshi Koyano1,2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of implant position and loading position on biomechanical behaviors using implant-supported removable partial denture (ISRPD) models in a simulated Kennedy class Ⅱ partially edentulous mandible. Three types of Kennedy class Ⅱ mandibular acrylic resin models (a conventional RPD without support by an implant-CRPD; models with an implant placed at first molar (#46)-MP-ISRPD- and second molar (#47)-DP-ISRPD) were used to measure vertical displacement of the RPD, mesio-distal displacement of the abutment tooth, and bending moment of the abutment tooth and implant under one-point loading. The variables at three respective loading points (#45, #46 and #47) were compared statistically. Vertical displacement was suppressed in ISRPDs compared to the CRPD, and significant effects were identified under loading at the implant position. The largest meiso-distal displacement was observed in MP-ISRPD under #47 loading. Bending moments of the abutment tooth and implant were significantly higher in MP-ISRPD than in DP-ISPRD. In MP-ISRPD, a higher bending moment of the abutment tooth under #45 and #47 loading was detected, although the bending moment in DP-ISRPD was almost zero. The results of this study suggested that MP-ISRPD shows the specific biomechanical behaviors, although DP-ISRPD might provide biomechanical benefits under all one-point loading conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kennedy class II; implant-supported removable partial denture 2; in vitro simulation model 3

Year:  2021        PMID: 33922523     DOI: 10.3390/ma14092145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materials (Basel)        ISSN: 1996-1944            Impact factor:   3.623


  31 in total

Review 1.  Complications associated with implant-retained removable prostheses.

Authors:  Farhad Vahidi; Gitanjali Pinto-Sinai
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2014-09-20

2.  Comparison of immediate-load mini dental implants and conventional-size dental implants to retain mandibular Kennedy class I removable partial dentures: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Waruth Threeburuth; Weerapan Aunmeungtong; Pathawee Khongkhunthian
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.932

3.  Influence of Implant Position in Implant-Assisted Removable Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Octavi Ortiz-Puigpelat; Aida Lázaro-Abdulkarim; Javier-María de Medrano-Reñé; Jordi Gargallo-Albiol; Josep Cabratosa-Termes; Federico Hernández-Alfaro
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Implant-supported mandibular removable partial dentures; patient-based outcome measures in relation to implant position.

Authors:  Charlotte Jensen; Gerry M Raghoebar; Wouter Kerdijk; Henny J A Meijer; Marco S Cune
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Assessment of mastication with implications for oral rehabilitation: a review.

Authors:  Andries van der Bilt
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 3.837

6.  Implant-supported removable partial dentures in the mandible: A 3-16 year retrospective study.

Authors:  Charlotte Jensen; Henny J A Meijer; Gerry M Raghoebar; Wouter Kerdijk; Marco S Cune
Journal:  J Prosthodont Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.642

Review 7.  Clinical effectiveness of implant-supported removable partial dentures: a review of the literature and retrospective case evaluation.

Authors:  Yoav Grossmann; Joseph Nissan; Liran Levin
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Mechanical behavior of implant assisted removable partial denture for Kennedy class II.

Authors:  João-Paulo-Mendes Tribst; Rodrigo-Máximo de Araújo; Naiara-Pires Ramanzine; Natália-Ribeiro Santos; Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Borges; João-Mauricio-Ferraz da Silva
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-01-01

9.  Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Ilser Turkyilmaz; Edwin A McGlumphy
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.