Literature DB >> 30063280

Comparison of immediate-load mini dental implants and conventional-size dental implants to retain mandibular Kennedy class I removable partial dentures: A randomized clinical trial.

Waruth Threeburuth1, Weerapan Aunmeungtong1, Pathawee Khongkhunthian1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complications of distal extension mandibular removable partial dentures are: loss of retention, irritation, and so forth. Dental implants have been used to support distal extension removable partial dentures. However, many patients have limited bone support in which to place conventional-size dental implants.
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of using immediate-loaded mini dental implants and immediate-loaded conventional-size dental implants, when used to retain mandibular Kennedy class I removable partial dentures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were randomly divided into two groups. Mini dental implants and conventional-size dental implants were placed in participants in the first molar region on both sides. The dentures were connected immediately. Patients were recalled on 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Digital periapical radiographs were made, and patient satisfaction was recorded. Data were analyzed by independent samples t-test and paired samples t-test (P = .05).
RESULTS: Twenty eight of the implants survived (survival rate = 93.3%) in each group. Mean radiographic bone loss was 0.47 ± 0.42 and 1.03 ± 1.07 mm in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Conventional-size implants revealed significantly greater marginal bone loss than mini implants (P = .01). Patient satisfaction showed significant improvement after treatment in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate-loaded mini dental implants can be applied for retaining mandibular Kennedy class I removable partial dentures with very favorable results.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  immediate loading radiographic bone loss; implant-retained removable partial denture; mini dental implant; patient satisfaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30063280     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  4 in total

1.  In Vitro Assessment of the Effect of Implant Position on Biomechanical Behaviors of Implant-Supported Removable Partial Dentures in Kennedy Class II Condition.

Authors:  Masafumi Kihara; Yoichiro Ogino; Yasuyuki Matsushita; Takehiro Morita; Yoshinori Sawae; Yasunori Ayukawa; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 2.  Treatment outcomes of implant-assisted removable partial denture with distal extension based on the Kennedy classification and attachment type: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adityakrisna Yoshi Putra Wigianto; Takaharu Goto; Yuki Iwawaki; Yuichi Ishida; Megumi Watanabe; Tetsuo Ichikawa
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-11-13

Review 3.  Implant-supported removable partial dentures compared to conventional dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life, patient satisfaction, and biomechanical complications.

Authors:  Octave N Bandiaky; Dohoue L Lokossou; Assem Soueidan; Pierre Le Bars; Moctar Gueye; Elhadj B Mbodj; Laurent Le Guéhennec
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-01-11

4.  Effect of Number and Location on Stress Distribution of Mini Dental Implant-Assisted Mandibular Kennedy Class I Removable Partial Denture: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Wissanee Jia-Mahasap; Chaiy Rungsiyakull; Wipahatpong Bumrungsiri; Natthaphorn Sirisereephap; Pimduen Rungsiyakull
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-03-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.