Literature DB >> 29235192

Influence of Implant Position in Implant-Assisted Removable Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Octavi Ortiz-Puigpelat1, Aida Lázaro-Abdulkarim1, Javier-María de Medrano-Reñé2, Jordi Gargallo-Albiol2, Josep Cabratosa-Termes2, Federico Hernández-Alfaro1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the ideal position of a dental implant to assist a posterior extended partial removable dental prosthesis (PRDP), through stress values, displacement values, and deformation of periodontal ligament (PDL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A finite element analysis of different implant positions was analyzed using a 3D mandible model from a human patient. Test models were created: model A (implant in second molar area), model B (implant in the first molar area), and model C (implant in premolar area). A control model without implant support was also created. Overall displacement values, von Mises stress distribution maps, and nonlinear deformations were evaluated.
RESULTS: Some differences could be observed between test models. The introduction of an implant in the edentulous area, unlike a conventional removable partial denture without implant support, decreases stress values in the biological structures such as: mandible, tooth, soft tissue, and PDL. Placing the implant in the first molar area resulted in improved displacement values, and reduced maximum stress values at the peri-implant bone area, metal structure, and implant were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study we can conclude that placing the implant in the position of the first molar improves biomechanical behavior of implant-assisted PRDPs.
© 2017 by the American College of Prosthodontists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental implants; finite element analysis; removable partial dentures; resilient attachment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29235192     DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  6 in total

1.  Clinical and radiographic evaluations of implants as surveyed crowns for Class I removable partial dentures: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Soo-Yeon Yoo; Seong-Kyun Kim; Seong-Joo Heo; Jai-Young Koak
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 1.989

2.  In Vitro Assessment of the Effect of Implant Position on Biomechanical Behaviors of Implant-Supported Removable Partial Dentures in Kennedy Class II Condition.

Authors:  Masafumi Kihara; Yoichiro Ogino; Yasuyuki Matsushita; Takehiro Morita; Yoshinori Sawae; Yasunori Ayukawa; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of mechanical function for 4 removable partial denture designs with 3 framework materials: CoCr, Ti-6Al-4V alloy and PEEK.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Bochun Mao; Zhuoli Zhu; Jiayi Yu; Yuqing Lu; Qianqian Zhang; Li Yue; Haiyang Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Mechanical behavior of implant assisted removable partial denture for Kennedy class II.

Authors:  João-Paulo-Mendes Tribst; Rodrigo-Máximo de Araújo; Naiara-Pires Ramanzine; Natália-Ribeiro Santos; Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Borges; João-Mauricio-Ferraz da Silva
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-01-01

5.  Clinical Performance of Implant Crown Retained Removable Partial Dentures for Mandibular Edentulism-A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Soo-Yeon Yoo; Seong-Kyun Kim; Seong-Joo Heo; Jai-Young Koak; Hye-Rin Jeon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Short strategic implants for mandibular removable partial dentures: One-year results from a pilot randomized crossover abutment type study.

Authors:  Norbert Enkling; Joël Nauli; Dominik Kraus; Julia Gabriela Wittneben; Martin Schimmel; Samir Abou-Ayash
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 5.021

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.