Literature DB >> 33922457

The Utility of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Nodes after Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Hoshino Terada1, Yuzo Shimode2, Madoka Furukawa3, Yuichiro Sato4, Nobuhiro Hanai1.   

Abstract

Background and
Objectives: There is evidence or consensus on the use of 18F-2-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) in evaluating the effects of treatment at 12 weeks after chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with cervical lymph node metastasis. However, the use of imaging to evaluate the effects of treatment within 12 weeks after chemoradiotherapy is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of lymph nodes metastasis after chemoradiotherapy according to the criteria of the "Evaluation of the effects of treatment on metastatic cervical lymph nodes using ultrasonography", which evaluated lymph nodes metastasis based on size change and presence of degeneration. Materials and methods: This prospective study included 34 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with cervical lymph nodes metastasis. Thirty-two patients who completed treatment were analyzed. Ultrasonography was performed at 4 and 8 weeks after chemoradiotherapy and we judged whether a favorable prognosis could be expected or whether additional treatments should be considered. Ultrasonography and PET-CT were performed at 12 weeks after chemoradiotherapy. Neck dissection was performed if residual disease was suspected based on the PET-CT findings.
Results: The accuracy and negative predictive value of ultrasonography were 81.3% and 96.3%, respectively. According to the Ultrasonography findings, the size of lymph nodes metastasis after chemoradiotherapy was significantly smaller than those before chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.05). The fluid and blood flow of lymph nodes metastasis showed a significantly reduced at 12 weeks after chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.05, p < 0.05, respectively). The echo density significantly changed from low to high echoic density after chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Ultrasonography was useful for evaluating cervical lymph nodes metastasis after chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRT; PET-CT; head and neck cancer; metastatic lymph node; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33922457     DOI: 10.3390/medicina57050407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)        ISSN: 1010-660X            Impact factor:   2.430


  12 in total

1.  Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Arlene A Forastiere; Helmuth Goepfert; Moshe Maor; Thomas F Pajak; Randal Weber; William Morrison; Bonnie Glisson; Andy Trotti; John A Ridge; Clifford Chao; Glen Peters; Ding-Jen Lee; Andrea Leaf; John Ensley; Jay Cooper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Infracentimetric cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Incidence and prognostic value.

Authors:  A Pauzie; M Gavid; J-M Dumollard; A Timoshenko; M Peoc'h; J-M Prades
Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.080

3.  The Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer after Radical Chemoradiotherapy: a Single Institution Experience.

Authors:  C Nelissen; J Sherriff; T Jones; P Guest; S Colley; P Sanghera; A Hartley
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.126

4.  Imaging strategy for response evaluation to chemoradiotherapy of the nodal disease in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Goshi Nishimura; Kenichiro Yabuki; Masaharu Hata; Masanori Komatsu; Takahide Taguchi; Masahiro Takahashi; Osamu Shiono; Daisuke Sano; Yasuhiro Arai; Hideaki Takahashi; Yoshihiro Chiba; Nobuhiko Oridate
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Diagnosis of lymph node metastases of head and neck cancer and evaluation of effects of chemoradiotherapy using ultrasonography.

Authors:  Madoka K Furukawa; Masaki Furukawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (sequential chemoradiotherapy) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer (PARADIGM): a randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Robert Haddad; Anne O'Neill; Guilherme Rabinowits; Roy Tishler; Fadlo Khuri; Douglas Adkins; Joseph Clark; Nicholas Sarlis; Jochen Lorch; Jonathan J Beitler; Sewanti Limaye; Sarah Riley; Marshall Posner
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Long-term results of positron emission tomography-directed management of the neck in node-positive head and neck cancer after organ preservation therapy.

Authors:  Johanna Sjövall; Benjamin Chua; David Pryor; Elizabeth Burmeister; Matthew C Foote; Benedict Panizza; Bryan H Burmeister; Sandro V Porceddu
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  Grey-scale sonography in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: review of sonographic appearances and features that may help a beginner.

Authors:  A Ahuja; M Ying
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.651

9.  PET-CT Surveillance versus Neck Dissection in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Hisham Mehanna; Wai-Lup Wong; Christopher C McConkey; Joy K Rahman; Max Robinson; Andrew G J Hartley; Christopher Nutting; Ned Powell; Hoda Al-Booz; Martin Robinson; Elizabeth Junor; Mohammed Rizwanullah; Sandra V von Zeidler; Hulya Wieshmann; Claire Hulme; Alison F Smith; Peter Hall; Janet Dunn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes.

Authors:  A T Ahuja; M Ying; S Y Ho; G Antonio; Y P Lee; A D King; K T Wong
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.