Literature DB >> 11010773

Grey-scale sonography in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: review of sonographic appearances and features that may help a beginner.

A Ahuja1, M Ying.   

Abstract

Ultrasound examinations of the neck in 218 patients with confirmed cervical lymphadenopathy were reviewed. Lymph nodes were assessed for their size, shape, internal architecture, echogenicity, nodal border, posterior enhancement, and ancillary features (adjacent soft tissues oedema, and matting). The hilus is a linear, echogenic, non-shadowing structure containing nodal vessels, and is continuous with fat around the node. Coagulation necrosis is an ill-defined, rounded, non-shadowing echogenic area within a node. It is less echogenic than the hilus and is not continuous with the fat around the node. Calcification is a highly echogenic focus within the node, which may be dense or punctate echogenic foci. It is not continuous with the fat around the node. Dense intranodal calcification usually produces shadowing. However, fine punctate calcification may not have posterior shadowing though, if the transducer frequency is increased, it may show thin lines. Cystic necrosis is focal, often ill-defined echolucent area within the node. Echogenicity of lymph nodes is usually compared with the adjacent muscles, and is classified as hypoechogenicity, isoechogenicity, and hyperechogenicity. The nodal border is assessed for its sharpness. Posterior enhancement is when the structures posterior to the node look more echogenic than neighbouring areas. Oedema of soft tissues is an ill-defined, hypoechoic area around the node with loss of adjacent fascial planes. Nodes are considered matted when they are clumped or adherent to each other with no normal intervening soft tissue between them. Ultrasound features that help only in identifying abnormal nodes include size, shape, echogenic hilus, hypoechogenicity or isoechogenicity, echogeneity, coagulation necrosis, and a sharp nodal border. Ultrasound features that help to identify abnormal nodes as well as giving clues to the primary lesion include hyperechogenicity, intranodal calcification, intranodal cystic necrosis, ragged nodal border, posterior enhancement, adjacent soft tissue oedema, and matting. Copyright 2000 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11010773     DOI: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  11 in total

Review 1.  Role of ultrasonography in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a review of literature.

Authors:  Kodali Rama Mohan; Nadella Koteswara Rao; Guttikonda Leela Krishna; Vedati Santosh Kumar; Nallamothu Ranganath; Uppaluru Vijaya Lakshmi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-03-14

2.  Ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced CT findings of tularemia in the neck.

Authors:  Serap Doğan; Afra Ekinci; Hayati Demiraslan; Ayşegül Ulu Kılıç; Ertuğrul Mavili; Mustafa Öztürk; Hakan İmamoğlu; Mehmet Doğanay
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Ultrasound evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy: Can it reduce the need of histopathology/cytopathology?

Authors:  Somali Pattanayak; Samar Chatterjee; R Ravikumar; V S Nijhawan; Jyotindu Debnath
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-05-31

4.  In vitro assessment of periapical lesions created in sheep mandibles by using high resolution ultrasonography and cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Kıvanç Kamburoğlu; Esra Ece Çakmak; Nejlan Eratam; Gül Sönmez; Sevilay Karahan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  The Utility of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Nodes after Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hoshino Terada; Yuzo Shimode; Madoka Furukawa; Yuichiro Sato; Nobuhiro Hanai
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Chronic cervical lymphadenopathy in children: Role of ultrasonography.

Authors:  Anand Pandey; Shiv N Kureel; Jigyasa Pandey; Ashish Wakhlu; Jiledar Rawat; Tej Bali Singh
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2012-04

Review 7.  Cervical lymph node diseases in children.

Authors:  Stephan Lang; Benjamin Kansy
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

Review 8.  Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes.

Authors:  A T Ahuja; M Ying; S Y Ho; G Antonio; Y P Lee; A D King; K T Wong
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 9.  Review of ultrasonography of malignant neck nodes: greyscale, Doppler, contrast enhancement and elastography.

Authors:  M Ying; K S S Bhatia; Y P Lee; H Y Yuen; A T Ahuja
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Evaluation of reliability of ultrasonographic parameters in differentiating benign and metastatic cervical group of lymph nodes.

Authors:  Chintamaneni Raja Lakshmi; M Sudhakara Rao; A Ravikiran; Sivan Sathish; Sujana Mulk Bhavana
Journal:  ISRN Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.