| Literature DB >> 33921829 |
Mi-Ju Kim1, Kun-Pyo Kim1, Eunhye Choi1, June-Hyuck Yim2, Chunpil Choi3, Hyun-Sun Yun4, Hee-Yoon Ahn4, Ji-Young Oh4, Yunhi Cho1.
Abstract
Lactobacillus plantarum CJLP55 has anti-pathogenic bacterial and anti-inflammatory activities in vitro. We investigated the dietary effect of CJLP55 supplement in patients with acne vulgaris, a prevalent inflammatory skin condition. Subjects ingested CJLP55 or placebo (n = 14 per group) supplements for 12 weeks in this double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study. Acne lesion count and grade, skin sebum, hydration, pH and surface lipids were assessed. Metagenomic DNA analysis was performed on urine extracellular vesicles (EV), which indirectly reflect systemic bacterial flora. Compared to the placebo supplement, CJLP55 supplement improved acne lesion count and grade, decreased sebum triglycerides (TG), and increased hydration and ceramide 2, the major ceramide species that maintains the epidermal lipid barrier for hydration. In addition, CJLP55 supplement decreased the prevalence of Proteobacteria and increased Firmicutes, which were correlated with decreased TG, the major skin surface lipid of sebum origin. CJLP55 supplement further decreased the Bacteroidetes:Firmicutes ratio, a relevant marker of bacterial dysbiosis. No differences in skin pH, other skin surface lipids or urine bacterial EV phylum were noted between CJLP55 and placebo supplements. Dietary Lactobacillus plantarum CJLP55 was beneficial to clinical state, skin sebum, and hydration and urine bacterial EV phylum flora in patients with acne vulgaris.Entities:
Keywords: Lactobacillus plantarum CJLP55; acne vulgaris; hydration; sebum; urine bacterial extracellular vesicles
Year: 2021 PMID: 33921829 PMCID: PMC8073324 DOI: 10.3390/nu13041368
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Baseline characteristics by groups.
| Characteristics | CJLP55 Group | Placebo Group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Sex (male/female) | 7/7 | 5/9 | 0.445 2 |
| Age (years) | 24.29 ± 0.73 1 | 23.86 ± 0.80 | 0.695 3 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 20.74 ± 0.64 | 21.39 ± 0.55 | 0.401 3 |
| Inflammatory lesion count (ILC) | 17.79 ± 3.19 | 19.64 ± 3.81 | 0.874 3 |
| Total lesion count (TLC) | 72.93 ± 10.11 | 98.14 ± 15.75 | 0.189 3 |
| Acne grade | 3.21 ± 0.19 | 3.14 ± 0.14 | 0.734 3 |
1 Mean ± SEM (all such values). 2 p value for difference in observed numbers of men and women from theoretical frequencies between the CJLP55 and placebo groups by chi-square test. 3 p value for difference between the CJLP55 and placebo groups by Student’s t test (age, TLC) or Mann–Whitney U test (body mass index, ILC, acne grade).
Altered acne lesion count and acne grade by groups.
| CJLP55 Group ( | Placebo Group ( | % Change | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Week12 | % Change | Baseline | Week12 | % Change | |||
|
| ||||||||
| Male subjects | 24.86 ± 4.74 | 6.71 ± 1.36 **1,2 | −72.99 ± 14.86 | 20.40 ± 6.78 | 15.40 ± 7.36 | −24.51 ± 15.88 | −48.48 (−97.84 to 0.89) 3 | 0.054 |
| Female subjects | 10.71 ± 2.24 | 4.57 ± 1.54 *2 | −57.33 ± 19.79 | 19.22 ± 4.89 | 14.00 ± 2.13 | −27.17 ± 16.31 | −30.17 (−84.67 to 24.34) | 0.255 |
| All subjects | 17.79 ± 3.19 | 5.64 ± 1.03 ***2 | −68.27 ± 14.83 | 19.64 ± 3.81 | 14.50 ± 2.79 *2 | −26.18 ± 11.43 | −42.09 (−80.57 to −3.61) | 0.033 |
|
| ||||||||
| Male subjects | 98.00 ± 13.73 | 39.57 ± 7.00 **2 | −59.62 ± 9.48 | 95.40 ± 28.62 | 78.00 ± 20.52 | −18.24 ± 10.83 | −41.38 (−73.67 to −9.10) | 0.017 |
| Female subjects | 47.86 ± 6.67 | 27.57 ± 6.15 **2 | −42.39 ± 10.41 | 99.67 ± 19.97 | 102.78 ± 20.02 | 3.12 ± 18.41 | −45.51 (−94.67 to 3.65) | 0.031 |
| All subjects | 72.93 ± 10.11 | 33.57 ± 4.77 ***2 | −53.97 ± 10.04 | 98.14 ± 15.75 | 93.93 ± 14.69 | −4.29 ± 12.58 | −49.67 (−82.76 to −16.59) | 0.002 |
|
| ||||||||
| Male subjects | 3.71 ± 0.18 | 2.86 ± 0.26 *2 | −23.08 ± 7.02 | 3.20 ± 0.20 | 3.40 ± 0.24 | 6.25 ± 6.25 | −29.33 (−51.36 to −7.29) | 0.030 |
| Female subjects | 2.71 ± 0.18 | 2.00 ± 0.31 *2 | −26.31 ± 6.79 | 3.11 ± 0.20 | 3.22 ± 0.15 | 3.57 ± 8.37 | −29.89 (−54.04 to −5.74) | 0.012 |
| All subjects | 3.21 ± 0.19 | 2.43 ± 0.23 **2 | −24.44 ± 4.81 | 3.14 ± 0.14 | 3.29 ± 0.13 | 4.55 ± 5.64 | −28.99 (−44.23 to −13.75) | 0.009 |
CI, confidence interval. 1 Mean ± SEM for all such values. 2 p value for difference from baseline within CJLP55 or placebo groups by paired t test (total lesion count) or Wilcoxon signed rank test (inflammatory lesion count, acne grade) (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). 3 Mean (95% CI) for all such values. 4 p value for difference of percent change between the CJLP55 and placebo groups by Student’s t test (inflammatory lesion count) or Mann–Whitney U test (total lesion count, acne grade).
Figure 1Photographs of acne improvement in subjects A (a,b), B (c,d), and C (e,f) in the CJLP55 group at baseline and week 12, respectively.
Altered skin sebum, hydration, and pH by groups.
| CJLP55 Group ( | Placebo Group ( | % Change | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Week12 | % Change | Baseline | Week12 | % Change | |||
|
| ||||||||
| All subjects | 178.82 ± 12.98 | 147.11 ± 16.40 *1,2 | −17.74 ± 6.04 | 202.36 ± 15.28 | 199.39 ± 16.44 | −1.47 ± 4.92 | −16.27 (−32.28 to −0.26) 3 | 0.005 |
|
| ||||||||
| All subjects | 73.47 ± 1.53 | 77.64 ± 1.99 | 5.67 ± 2.95 | 72.67 ± 1.73 | 66.24 ± 1.78 | −8.85 ± 2.58 | 14.52 (6.47 to 22.57) | 0.003 |
|
| ||||||||
| All subjects | 6.67 ± 0.15 | 5.40 ± 0.10 | −18.93 ± 2.70 | 6.69 ± 0.11 | 5.61 ± 0.11 | −16.17 ± 2.42 | −2.76 (−10.21 to 4.69) | 0.453 |
CI, confidence interval; au, arbitrary unit. 1 Mean ± SEM for all such values. 2 p value for difference from baseline within CJLP55 or placebo groups by paired t test (skin sebum, skin hydration) or Wilcoxon signed rank test (skin pH) (* p < 0.05). 3 Mean (95% CI) for all such values. 4 p value for difference of percent change between the CJLP55 and placebo groups by Student’s t test (skin pH) or Mann–Whitney U test (skin sebum, skin hydration).
Figure 2Altered levels of skin surface lipids in CJLP55 and placebo groups. Values are mean ± SEM (CJLP55 group: n = 14; placebo group: n = 14). Differences between baseline (white bars) and week 12 (black bars) in lipid fractions of the CJLP55 or placebo groups were evaluated using paired t-test test (Total lipids, Chol, Cer2) or Wilcoxon signed rank test (TG, FFA, Total Cer) (* p < 0.05). TG, triglycerides; FFA, free fatty acids; Chol, cholesterol; Cer, ceramides; Cer2, ceramide 2.
Figure 3Altered abundance of bacterial extracellular vesicle (EV) phyla in urine of CJLP55 and placebo groups. (a) Altered % total proportion of urine bacterial EV phyla from baseline to 12 weeks in individual subjects of groups. The horizontal axis displays the subject number. (b) Altered % total proportion of urine bacterial EV phyla over 12 weeks in groups. Phyla present at less than 0.5% are noted as “others.” B/F ratio: Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes ratio. All values in (b) are mean ± SEM (CJLP55 group: n = 9; placebo group: n = 12). Differences from baseline within CJLP55 or placebo groups in (b) were determined by Wilcoxon signed rank test Differences of percent change between CJLP55 and placebo groups in (b) were determined by unpaired Student’s t test (Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Verrucomicrobia, B/F ratio) or Mann–Whitney U test (Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Others) (* p < 0.05). (c) Principle component analysis (PCA) score on percent changes of bacterial EV phyla over 12 weeks in groups.
Figure 4Correlations between percent changes in triglyceride levels and in (a) Proteobacteria and (b) Firmicutes proportions over 12 weeks in individual subjects of the CJLP55 group (n = 9).