| Literature DB >> 33921445 |
Chiara Roberta Girelli1, Francesca Serio1, Rita Accogli1, Federica Angilè1, Antonella De Donno1, Francesco Paolo Fanizzi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plants of genus Cichorium are known for their therapeutic and nutraceutical properties determined by a wealth of phytochemical substances contained in the whole plant. The aim of this paper was to characterize the metabolic profiles of local Salento chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) varieties ("Bianca", "Galatina", "Leccese", and "Otranto") in order to describe their metabolites composition together with possible bioactivity and health beneficial properties.Entities:
Keywords: NMR-spectroscopy; food safety; human health; metabolomics; nutraceuticals
Year: 2021 PMID: 33921445 PMCID: PMC8069254 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18084057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Chicory local varieties described in this paper. (a) “Bianca”; (b) “Galatina”; (c) “Leccese”; (d) “Otranto”.
Figure 21H-NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy) typical spectrum of a C. inthybus aqueous extract samples. Expanded areas in of (a) (−0.5 to 3 ppm), aliphatic region; (b) (3–5 ppm) sugars region; (c) (5–10 ppm) aromatic region. The peaks of relevant metabolites are indicated.
1H- chemical shifts of assigned metabolites. Signals refers to TSP signals (0 ppm).
| Metabolites | Chemical Shifts δ (ppm) |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Leucine | 0.97 (d, β-CH3), 1.72 (d, β-CH2) |
| Valine | 0.98 (d, CH3), 1.03 (d, CH3), 2.26 (m, β-CH) |
| Isoleucine | 1.00 (d, β−CH3) |
| Threonine | 1.32 (d, γ-CH3), 4.26 (α-CH) |
| Alanine | 1.47 (d, CH3), 3.79 (m, α-CH) |
| GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) | 1.90 (m, β-CH2), 2.35 (t, α-CH2), 3.02 (t, γ-CH2) |
| Glutamine | 2.13 (m, β-CH2), 2.44 (m, γ-CH2), 3.76 (m, α-CH) |
| Glutamate | 2.36 (m, γ-CH2) |
| Asparagine | 2.95 (dd, β-CH2) |
| Tyrosine | 6.91 (m, CH3, H5), 7.19 (m, CH2, CH6) |
| Phenylalanine | 7.43 (m, CH-3, 5, ring), 7.37 (m, CH-4, ring),
|
|
| |
| β-D-glucose | 3.26 (dd, CH-2), 3.48 (t, CH-3),4.64 (d, CH-1) |
| α-D-glucose | 3.5 (dd, H2), 5.23 (d, H1) |
| Sucrose | 3.55 (dd, CH-2), 3.67 (s, CH-2′), 3.81 (m, CH2-6,6′), 4.20 (d, H3′), 5.40 (d, CH-1) |
| α-D-fructofuranose | 4.01 (CH-5), 4.1 (d, CH-3,) |
| β-D-fructofuranose | 4.12 (m, CH-3, CH-4), 3.80 (m, CH-5) |
| β-D-fructopyranose | 4.02 (CH-5), 3.70, 3.56 (CH2-1,1′) |
| Inulin | 5.42 (m, CH-1), 4.28 (m, CH-3′) |
|
| |
| Malate | 2.39 (β-CH), 2.69 (β’-CH), 4.31 (α-CH) |
| Tartrate | 4.31(s, CH) |
| Fumarate | 6.52 (α, β-CH=CH) |
| Formate | 8.46 (s, HCOOH) |
|
| |
| Cichoric acid | 5.54 (s, CH(O)COOH), 6.50 (d, =CH-COO−), 6.97 (d, CH5′), 7.26 (d, CH-2′), 7.72 (d, -CH=) |
| Monocaffeoyl tartaric acid | 6.89 (d, CH-5′), 7.62 (d, -CH=), 6.43 (d, =CH-COO−), 5.30 (d, CH(O)COOH) |
| Chlorogenic acid | 7.61 (d, -CH=), 6.35 (d, =CH-COO−), 5.32 (d, CH(O)COOH) |
|
| |
| fatty acids | 0.9 |
| uridine | 7.9 (d, CH-5, ring), 5.9 (CH-6, ring) |
| deoxyadenosine | 8.3 (s, CH-13 ring), 8.2(s, CH-11, ring) |
| trigonelline | 9.13 (s, CH-2), 8,84 (t, CH-3,5) |
Figure 3Principal Component Analysis (PCA) t[1]/[t2] scores plot for local C. intybus varieties t[1] and t[2] components explain 77.7% of the total variance.
Figure 4(a) Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) t[1]/t[2] scores plot for C. inthybus local varieties (three components, R2X (cum) = 0.873; R2Y (cum) = 0.934, Q2 (cum) = 0.92, p[CV]-anova = 0. (b) loading scatter plot for the PLS-DA model, colored according to the correlation scaled coefficient (* p(corr) ≥ |0.5|). The colour bar associated to the plot indicates the correlation of the metabolites in segregating among classes.
Figure 5(a) PLS-DA t[1]/t[2] scores plot for C. inthybus local varieties (three components, R2X (cum) = 0.968, R2Y (cum) = 0.766, Q2 (cum) = 0.726, p[CV]-anova = 1.357 × 10−18) focusing aromatic spectral region. (b) loading scatter plot for the PLS-DA model, colored according to the correlation scaled coefficient (* p(corr) ≥ |0.5|). The colour bar associated to the plot indicates the correlation of the metabolites in segregating among classes.
Figure 6Line trend plot reporting the selected variables trend colored according to the varieties class.
Figure 7(a) Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analyses (OPLS-DA) t[1]/to [1] scores plot for “Bianca” and “Galatina” local varieties (1 + 1 + 0, R2X = 0.671, R2Y = 0.941, Q2 = 0.842) focusing aromatic spectral region. (b) S-line plot for the model, colored according to the correlation scaled coefficient (* p(corr) ≥ |0.5|). The colour bar associated to the plot indicates the correlation of the metabolites in segregating among classes.
Figure 8(a) OPLS-DA t[1]/to [1] scores plot for “Otranto”and “Leccese” local varieties (1 + 1 + 0, R2X = 0.948, R2Y = 0.996, Q2 = 0.995) focusing aromatic spectral region). (b) S. line plot for the model, colored according to the correlation scaled coefficient (* p(corr) ≥ |0.5|). The colour bar associated to the plot indicates the correlation of the metabolites in segregating among classes.
Figure 9Discriminant metabolites multiple comparison graphical summary for “Bianca”, “Galatina”, “Leccese”, and “Otranto” chicory varieties. The bar plots show the original values (mean +/− standard deviation of integrals corresponding to specific Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) peak related buckets for each group). Values with different letters indicate significant differences of metabolite level. (Multiple Comparisons of Means test Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test).