| Literature DB >> 33920975 |
Andreas Ouranidis1,2, Anastasia Tsiaxerli1, Elisavet Vardaka1, Catherine K Markopoulou3, Constantinos K Zacharis3, Ioannis Nicolaou4, Dimitris Hatzichristou5, Anna-Bettina Haidich6, Nikolaos Kostomitsopoulos7, Kyriakos Kachrimanis1.
Abstract
Sildenafil is a potent selective, reversible inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) approved for the treatment of erectile dysfunction and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Whilst twenty years have passed since its original approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA), sildenafil enters the fourth industrial era catalyzing the treatment advances against erectile dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension. The plethora of detailed clinical data accumulated and the two sildenafil analogues marketed, namely tadalafil and vardenafil, signify the relevant therapeutic and commercial achievements. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behavior of the drug appears complex, interdependent and of critical importance whereas the treatment of special population cohorts is considered. The diversity of the available formulation strategies and their compatible administration routes, extend from tablets to bolus suspensions and from per os to intravenous, respectively, inheriting the associated strengths and weaknesses. In this comprehensive review, we attempt to elucidate the multi-disciplinary elements spanning the knowledge fields of chemical synthesis, physicochemical properties, pharmacology, clinical applications, biopharmaceutical profile, formulation approaches for different routes of administration and analytical strategies, currently employed to guide the development of sildenafil-based compositions.Entities:
Keywords: PDE5 inhibitors; efficacy and safety; formulation; fourth industrial era; improved solubility; nanomaterial; reduced side effects; sildenafil
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920975 PMCID: PMC8071249 DOI: 10.3390/ph14040365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Figure 1Evolution of sildenafil synthetic routes: (a) initial synthesis of sildenafil citrate; (b) improved synthesis scheme using 2,2-ethoxy benzoyl chloride; (c) optimized commercial synthesis of sildenafil in terms of green chemistry.
Indicative references to salts, cocrystals and solvates of sildenafil.
| Pharmaceutical Compositions | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|
|
| Salts | [ |
|
| Solvates | [ |
|
| [ | |
|
| Solvate | [ |
|
| Cocrystal | [ |
|
| Cocrystal | [ |
|
| Cocrystal | [ |
|
| Solvates of salts | [ |
|
| Cocrystals | [ |
Figure 2Ampholytic ionization states of sildenafil (Reprinted from ref. [14]).
Figure 3Pharmacodynamic profile of sildenafil: (a) distribution flows in a physiological map of human tissues; (b) schematic of artery and interstitial/intracellular medium, intracellular tissue; (c) schematic of artery and interstitial/intracellular medium, intracellular tissue pinpointing the corpus cavernosum compartment; (d) conversion of the catalytic center of the PDE5 enzyme into a higher affinity structure; (e) enhancement of inhibition of PDE activity by increase of sildenafil concentration (adopted with permission from [70]. 2007 ASPET); (f) differential affinities of sildenafil inhibition activated by cGMP (adopted with permission from [72]. 2010 ASPET).
Comprehensive collection of advantages and disadvantages of various studied formulations.
| Tablets | -Stability | -Poor Patient Compliance Due to Swallowing Difficulties |
|---|---|---|
|
| -disintegration friendly, in the oral cavity, limited volume of saliva | -bitter taste |
|
| - first past metabolism elimination | |
|
| -easy swallowing | -first pass metabolism |
|
| - bioavailability enhancement | -poor patient compliance due to swallowing difficulties |
|
| - first pass metabolism elimination | -poor permeability across nasal mucosa |
|
| -local action, | -rapid clearance from the pulmonary compartment |
|
| -controlled released | slow absorption rate |
|
| -highest bioavailability and Cmax | -difficult, demanding process |
Indicative marketed formulations of sildenafil citrate and diverse administration routes.
| Formulation | Route | Dose (mg), | Excipients | Condition | Name | Market Holder | Authorization | EPAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| oral | 25, 50, 100 | Microcrystalline cellulose, Silica, hydrophobic colloidal Croscarmellose sodium, Magnesium stearate Indigo | ED | Viagra | Pfizer | 1998 | [ |
|
| oral | 25, 50, 100 | Tablet core | ED | Sildenafil Teva | Teva | 2009 | [ |
|
| oral | 25, 50, 100 | Hydroxypropyl cellulose (E463), Mannitol (E421) | ED | Vizarsin | Krka d.d. | 2009 | [ |
|
| oral | 25, 50, 75, 100 | Maltodextrin, Glycerol, Polysorbate 20, Propylene glycol monocaprylate, Polyvinyl acetate dispersion 30%, Lemon and Grapefruit flavors (Lemon essential oil, Citral, | ED | Sildenafil | IBSA | 2013 | [ |
|
| oral | 25, 50, 100 | Polacrilin potassium, silica colloidal anhydrous, lactose monohydrate, povidone K-30, aspartame (E951), | ED | Sildenafil Portfarma | Portfarma | 2012 | [ |
|
| IV | 0.8 mg/mL | Glucose | PAH | Revatio | Upjohn EESV | 2005 | [ |
|
| oral | 10 mg/mL | Powder for oral suspension: Sorbitol Citric acid anhydrous, Sucralose, Sodium citrate, Xanthan gum, Titanium dioxide (E171), Sodium benzoate (E211), Silica, colloidal anhydrous | PAH | Revatio | Upjohn EESV | 2005 | [ |
Figure 4(a) Chemical structure of sildenafil impurities A, B, C, D and E.; (b) MRM chromatogram of N-desmethylsildenafil, sildenafil and quinoxaline (internal standard) adopted with permission from [30]. 2015 Elsevier.
Reverse phase chromatography and operational conditions.
| Stationary Phase | Mobile Phase | Flow Rate/Temp | LOD | UV (nm) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Acetonitrile/water, 60/40, | 2 mL min−1/Ambient | 25 | 292 | [ |
|
| Phosphate buffer 10 mM (pH 6.5)/MeOH, gradient | 1 mL min−1/40 °C | 1.49 | 286 | [ |
|
| CH3COONH4 0.2 M (pH 7.0)/CH3CN, 50/50 | 1 mL min−1/Ambient | 0.413 | 240 | [ |
|
| TEA 0.2% | 1 mL min−1/Ambient | 0.3 | 230 | [ |
|
| CH3CN/phosphate buffer (70/30 | 0.8 mL min−1/Ambient | 1.8 | 228 | [ |
|
| CH3COONH4 0.2M (pH 7.0)/CH3CN, 50/50 | 1.0 mL min−1/25 °C | 3.82 | 245 | [ |
|
| CH3COONH4 0.03M/CH3CN gradient | 1.0 mL min−1/40 °C | 0.67 | 230 | [ |
Overview of recent bioanalytical methods of sildenafil.
| Analyte LC-MS | Sample | Sample Preparation | Analytical Parameters | Detection | LOD/LOQ | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Human plasma | Protein precipitation using acetonitrile | Gradient elution using water and acetonitrile both containing 0.1% | MS/MS (MRM 1) | NM 2/2 ng mL−1 | [ |
|
| Human plasma | (1) Protein precipitation using acetonitrile | Isocratic elution: 5 mM CH3COONH4/acetonitrile, 50/50 | MS | NM/1 ng mL−1 | [ |
|
| Human plasma, urine | Magnetic SPE using citric acid coated iron oxide nanoparticles | Gradient elution using 10 mM HCOONH4 (pH 4.6) and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid | QTOF-MS/MS | 0.74/2.45 ng g−1 | [ |
|
| Human plasma, urine | Magnetic SPE using citric acid coated iron oxide nanoparticles | Gradient elution using 10 mM HCOONH4 (pH 4.6) and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid | QTOF-MS/MS | 0.14/0.47 ng g−1 | [ |
|
| Human urine, simulated gastric fluid | Dilution | Gradient elution using 10 mM HCOONH4 (pH 4.6) and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid | QTOF-MS/MS | 2.19/7.28 ng g−1 | [ |
|
| Rat plasma | Protein precipitation using methanol | Gradient elution using water and methanol both containing 0.1% formic acid | MS/MS (MRM) | NM/5 ng mL−1 | [ |
|
| Human plasma | Protein precipitation using acetonitrile | Gradient elution using water and acetonitrile both containing 0.05% formic acid | MS/MS (MRM) | 1.95/3.9 ng mL | [ |
|
| Animal hair | Digestion with 5M HCl methanolic solution followed by mixed-mode SPE using C18 and strong ion exchange polymeric sorbents | Gradient elution using water and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid | MS/MS (MRM) | 0.05/0.1 ng mg−1 | [ |
|
| Human plasma | SPE using Oasis WAX cartridges | Isocratic elution using 5 mM CH3COONH4 (pH 5.0)/acetonitrile, 55/45 | MS/MS (MRM) | NM/2 ng mL−1 | [ |
|
| Human plasma | Protein precipitation using acetonitrile followed by heating at 60 °C | Gradient elution using 50 mM CH3COONH4/3% trifluoroacetic acid/methanol/acetonitrile, 68/2/15/15 | MS/MS (MRM) | 7.25/10 ng mL−1 | [ |
|
| Dried blood spot | LLE 4 using diethyl ether | Isocratic elution using 2 mM CH3COONH4 (pH 5.0)/acetonitrile, 65/35 | MS/MS (MRM) | NM/5 ng mL−1 | [ |
|
| Human plasma | LLE using methyl terb-butyl ether | Isocratic elution using 0.02% formic acid/acetonitrile, 30/70 | MS/MS (MRM) | NM | [ |
|
| Human plasma | SPE using Sep-Pak tC18 | Isocratic elution using 5 mM ammonium formate/acetonitrile, 60/40 | MS | NM/5 ng mL−1 | [ |
|
| ||||||
|
| Human plasma | Protein precipitation using acetonitrile | Gradient elution using sodium octanesulfonate, EDTA aqueous solution (pH 3.0) and acetonitrile or ethanol | UV@210nm | 200/500 ng mL−1 (using Column I) | [ |
|
| Rabbit plasma | SPE using Oasis HLB | Isocratic elution using 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5)/acetonitrile, 55/45 | UV@220nm | 0.01/0.03 μg mL−1 | [ |
|
| Rat plasma | Protein precipitation | Isocratic elution using a mixture of acetonitrile and water (57.5/42.5 | UV@230nm | NM/20 ng mL−1 | [ |
|
| Human plasma | LLE using ethyl acetate | Isocratic elution using a mixture of 30 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0)/acetonitrile, 53/47 | UV@230nm | 0.5/1 ng mL−1 | [ |
|
| Human plasma | LLE using diethylacetate followed by back-extraction with 5% HClO4 aqueous solution | Isocratic elution using a mixture of water and acetonitrile (63/37 | UV@230nm | NM/2 ng mL−1 | [ |
|
| Rat plasma | LLE using ethyl acetate/hexane (30/70 | Isocratic elution using a mixture of 50 mM KH2PO4 (pH 4.5) and acetonitrile, 75/25 | UV@230nm | 5/10 ng mL−1 | [ |
|
| Human urine | SPE using 17 different silica- and polymeric-based sorbents | Gradient elution using water and acetonitrile both containing 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid | UV@228nm | 66/198 ng mL−1 | [ |
|
| Human plasma | LLE using ethyl acetate | Isocratic elution using a mixture of 30 mM KH2PO4 (pH 4.5) and acetonitrile, 53/47 | UV@230nm | 1/10 ng mL−1 | [ |
|
| Human plasma | Ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid liquid microextraction followed by back-extraction with 10% acetic acid | Isocratic elution using a mixture of water and methanol both containing 1% acetic acid, 60/40 | UV@254nm | 0.17/NM | [ |
|
| ||||||
|
| Human serum | Dilution | Screen-printed electrode with carbon working and auxiliary electrodes and silver reference electrode | − | 5.9 × 10−10/2.0 × 10−9 mol L−1 | [ |
|
| Human serum | NM | Square wave voltammetry using polycrystalline gold (surface area 0.5 cm2), gold wire and saturated calomel electrode as working, counter and reference electrodes respectively | − | 0.031/0.106 μmol L−1 | [ |
|
| Simulated human urine | Dilution | Cyclic voltammetry using screen-printed glassy carbon electrode modified gold nanoparticles via electrodeposition | − | 5.2 × 10−10 mol L−1/NM | [ |
|
| ||||||
|
| Human urine | Dispersive solid-phase microextraction using Mn@ CuS/ZnS nanocomposite loaded on activated carbon | − | NM | 2.5/8.35 ng mL−1 | [ |
1 MRM: multiple reaction monitoring. 2 NM: not mentioned. 3 SPE: solid phase extraction. 4 LLE: liquid liquid extraction