| Literature DB >> 33920105 |
Yupei Hao1, Xiongyi Miao1,2, Hongwei Liu3, Dan Miao4.
Abstract
The bioavailability of heavy metals (HMs) in sediments is closely related to the security of the aquatic environment, but their impacts are poorly researched, particularly in karstic rivers. Therefore, Liujiang River Basin was taken as an example in this study. Seven HMs were analyzed to determine the bioavailability and speciations of HMs in sediments. Moreover, the impacts of environmental factors on HMs were identified. The obtained results suggested that HMs in the sediments are all within their permissible exposure limit (PEL), but Cd and Zn are significantly higher than the soil baseline. Most HMs were found to be in a residual fraction, while their exchangeable fraction was found to be in an extremely low ratio. HMs in bioavailable parts are significantly higher than in the exchangeable and carbonate-bound phases but lower than in the non-residual phase, which demonstrated that HM bioavailability is not confined to the exchangeable and carbonate-bound phases. The correlation coefficients commonly decreased with decreasing speciation ratios, which suggested that the overall bioavailability of metals should be determined by speciation ratios instead of speciations themselves. Noteworthily, most HMs in the residual form were found to be significantly correlated with their overall bioavailability, which highlighted the potential bioavailability of residual form. The non-correlations between pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), and HM bioavailability suggested that HMs in the carbonate-bound phase are stable and unsusceptible to environmental variations, while the significant correlations between redox potential (Eh), turbidity, organic matter (OM), main grain size (Mz), and HM bioavailability suggested that HMs in the reducible and oxidizable forms are susceptible to environmental fluctuations. Therefore, the variation of HM bioavailability in karstic rivers is largely regulated by their reducible and oxidizable forms instead of their carbonate-bound form.Entities:
Keywords: Liujiang River Basin; bioavailability; heavy metals; sediments; speciations
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920105 PMCID: PMC8069464 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18083986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Sample collection distribution of Liujiang River Basin.
The properties in sediments and their overlying water. EC: electrical conductivity; DO: dissolved oxygen; Eh: redox potential; TDS: total dissolved solids; OM: organic matter; Mz: main grain size.
| DO (mg/L) | EC (μs/cm) | pH | Eh (mV) | TDS (ppm) | Turbidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overlying water chemistry | ||||||
| Min–Max | 6.22–8.43 | 141.5–252.2 | 6.79–8.48 | 94.89–161.1 | 71.1–127.2 | 8.13–28.1 |
| Mean | 7.2 | 168.1 | 7.81 | 114.03 | 84.9 | 13.61 |
| OM (%) | Mz (μm) | Sand (%) | Silt (%) | Clay (%) | ||
| Sediment properties | ||||||
| Min–Max | 0.37–1.37 | 10.24–27.63 | 0.05–7.24 | 62.74–79.84 | 15.74–27.63 | |
| Mean | 0.72 | 21.23 | 3.79 | 74.05 | 22.16 | |
Heavy metal concentrations in sediments. BSG: background values of soil in Guangxi, China; TEL: threshold effect level; probable effect level.
| Location | Cd | Pb | Cr | Cu | Zn | As | Hg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg/kg | |||||||
| BSG | 0.267 | 24 | 82.1 | 27.8 | 75.6 | 20.5 | 0.152 |
| Liujiang River Basin | 0.44–6.36 | 17.74–43.31 | 27.64–91 | 19.98–35.86 | 68.47–196.95 | 8.29–69.76 | 0.09–1.32 |
| 1.27 | 30.10 | 53.53 | 25.20 | 124.93 | 23.24 | 0.19 | |
| TEL | 0.6 a | 35 a | 42 a | 36 a | 123 a | 7.2 b | 0.17 a |
| PEL | 3.5 a | 91 a | 160 a | 197 a | 315 a | 42 b | 0.49 a |
a. The freshwater sediment quality of Canada; b. The sediment quality criteria of Hong Kong.
Figure 2Heavy metal levels (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments with different fractions.
Figure 3The ratio of heavy metals in bioavailable parts, the exchangeable (Fr1) and carbonate-bound (Fr2) forms, and the non-residual form.
The correlation between the bioavailable part, speciations, and total concentration of heavy metals.
| BCu | BPb | BZn | BCr | BCd | BAs | BHg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fr1 | 0.244 | 0.182 |
| 0.309 |
|
| 0.061 |
| Fr2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.295 |
| Fr3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.202 |
| Fr4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.232 |
| Fr5 |
|
|
| 0.069 | 0.369 |
| −0.125 |
| Total |
|
|
| 0.135 |
|
| −0.08 |
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Note: Fr1–Fr5 means metals in exchangeable fraction, carbonate-bound fraction, reducible fraction, oxidizable fraction, and residual fraction, respectively; Bmetal is equal to metal in bioavailable part.
The correlation of heavy metals between metals in non-residual and residual forms.
| Cr | Cu | Zn | Cd | Pb | As | Hg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F5 | |||||||
| F1 |
|
|
| 0.201 | 0.234 | 0.163 |
|
| F2 | 0.361 | 0.185 |
| 0.372 | 0.225 |
| 0.063 |
| F3 | 0.366 |
|
| 0.383 |
|
| 0.068 |
| F4 |
| 0.407 |
|
|
|
| −0.032 |
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Note: Fr1–Fr5 means metals in exchangeable fraction, carbonate-bound fraction, reducible fraction, oxidizable fraction, and residual fraction, respectively.
The correlation between heavy metals in bioavailable part and environmental variations.
| Do | Ec | pH | Eh | TDS | Turbidity | OM | Mz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCu | 0.257 | 0.213 | 0.054 | 0.286 | 0.215 |
|
|
|
| BPb | 0.366 | 0.318 | −0.021 |
| 0.317 |
| 0.255 | −0.244 |
| BZn | 0.286 | 0.3 | 0.063 |
| 0.298 |
| 0.175 | −0.274 |
| BCr | 0.291 | 0.325 | 0.089 | 0.053 | 0.324 | −0.306 |
|
|
| BCd | 0.114 |
|
|
|
| −0.308 | 0.035 | −0.033 |
| BAs | 0.209 | −0.057 | 0.209 |
| −0.058 |
| −0.082 | 0.027 |
| BHg | 0.136 | 0.302 | −0.321 | 0.01 | 0.303 | −0.149 |
|
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Bmetal is equal to metal in bioavailable part.