Literature DB >> 33917495

How Executive Processes Explain the Overlap between Working Memory Capacity and Fluid Intelligence: A Test of Process Overlap Theory.

Tengfei Wang1, Chenyu Li1, Xuezhu Ren2, Karl Schweizer3.   

Abstract

Working memory capacity (WMC) and fluid intelligence (Gf) are highly correlated, but what accounts for this relationship remains elusive. Process-overlap theory (POT) proposes that the positive manifold is mainly caused by the overlap of domain-general executive processes which are involved in a battery of mental tests. Thus, executive processes are proposed to explain the relationship between WMC and Gf. The current study aims to (1) achieve a relatively purified representation of the core executive processes including shifting and inhibition by a novel approach combining experimental manipulations and fixed-links modeling, and (2) to explore whether these executive processes account for the overlap between WMC and Gf. To these ends, we reanalyzed data of 215 university students who completed measures of WMC, Gf, and executive processes. Results showed that the model with a common factor, as well as shifting and inhibition factors, provided the best fit to the data of the executive function (EF) task. These components explained around 88% of the variance shared by WMC and Gf. However, it was the common EF factor, rather than inhibition and shifting, that played a major part in explaining the common variance. These results do not support POT as underlying the relationship between WMC and Gf.

Entities:  

Keywords:  executive processes; fixed-links modeling; fluid intelligence; working memory capacity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33917495     DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence9020021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intell        ISSN: 2079-3200


  29 in total

1.  Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans.

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Sophie Bernardin; Valerie Camos
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-03

2.  Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005).

Authors:  Michael J Kane; David Z Hambrick; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  Working memory.

Authors:  A Baddeley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Complex span versus updating tasks of working memory: the gap is not that deep.

Authors:  Florian Schmiedek; Andrea Hildebrandt; Martin Lövdén; Oliver Wilhelm; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin.

Authors:  Naomi P Friedman; Akira Miyake; Susan E Young; John C DeFries; Robin P Corley; John K Hewitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-05

6.  A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence on the near- and far-transfer effects among children's executive function skills.

Authors:  Reka Kassai; Judit Futo; Zsolt Demetrovics; Zsofia K Takacs
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control.

Authors:  Christopher Draheim; Jason S Tsukahara; Jessie D Martin; Cody A Mashburn; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-07-23

8.  Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Miriam Gade; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Andrew R A Conway; Timothy K Miura; Gregory J H Colflesh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.