Literature DB >> 28956944

Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability.

Alodie Rey-Mermet1, Miriam Gade1, Klaus Oberauer2.   

Abstract

Inhibition is often conceptualized as a unitary construct reflecting the ability to ignore and suppress irrelevant information. At the same time, it has been subdivided into inhibition of prepotent responses (i.e., the ability to stop dominant responses) and resistance to distracter interference (i.e., the ability to ignore distracting information). The present study investigated the unity and diversity of inhibition as a psychometric construct, and tested the hypothesis of an inhibition deficit in older age. We measured inhibition in young and old adults with 11 established laboratory tasks: antisaccade, stop-signal, color Stroop, number Stroop, arrow flanker, letter flanker, Simon, global-local, positive and negative compatibility tasks, and n-2 repetition costs in task switching. In both age groups, the inhibition measures from individual tasks had good reliabilities, but correlated only weakly among each other. Structural equation modeling identified a 2-factor model with factors for inhibition of prepotent responses and resistance to distracter interference. Older adults scored worse in the inhibition of prepotent response, but better in the resistance to distracter interference. However, the model had low explanatory power. Together, these findings call into question inhibition as a psychometric construct and the hypothesis of an inhibition deficit in older age. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28956944     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  56 in total

1.  More evidence that a switch is not (always) a switch: Binning bilinguals reveals dissociations between task and language switching.

Authors:  Dorit Segal; Alena Stasenko; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-11-05

Review 2.  Large-scale analysis of test-retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures.

Authors:  A Zeynep Enkavi; Ian W Eisenberg; Patrick G Bissett; Gina L Mazza; David P MacKinnon; Lisa A Marsch; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Executive Function and Subjective Well-being in Middle and Late Adulthood.

Authors:  Wei Xing Toh; Hwajin Yang; Andree Hartanto
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Inhibition in aging: What is preserved? What declines? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Miriam Gade
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

5.  Inhibition tasks are not associated with a variety of behaviors in college students.

Authors:  Curtis D Von Gunten; Bruce D Bartholow; Jorge S Martins
Journal:  Eur J Pers       Date:  2020-04-01

6.  Alcohol effects on response inhibition: Variability across tasks and individuals.

Authors:  Bruce D Bartholow; Kimberly A Fleming; Phillip K Wood; Nelson Cowan; J Scott Saults; Lee Altamirano; Akira Miyake; Jorge Martins; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 7.  Delta plots for conflict tasks: An activation-suppression race model.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Wolf Schwarz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-07-29

8.  Differences between young and older adults in unity and diversity of executive functions.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Glisky; Gene E Alexander; Mingzhu Hou; Kevin Kawa; Cindy B Woolverton; Erika K Zigman; Lauren A Nguyen; Kari Haws; Aurelio J Figueredo; Lee Ryan
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2020-10-08

9.  Age-related post-error slowing and stimulus repetition effect in motor inhibition during a stop-signal task.

Authors:  Howard Muchen Hsu; Shulan Hsieh
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-06-23

10.  Cognitive control regions are recruited in bilinguals' silent reading of mixed-language paragraphs.

Authors:  Alena Stasenko; Chelsea Hays; Christina E Wierenga; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.