| Literature DB >> 33906601 |
Yong Bian1, Yanhui Huang1, Jie Bai1, Jijian Zheng2, Yue Huang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study investigated the success rate of the great saphenous venous catheter placement performed by ultrasound-assisted technique compared with the conventional puncture method in infants and toddlers with congenital heart disease and aimed to assess the efficiency and feasibility of this method within the context of pediatric peripheral venous access.Entities:
Keywords: Congenital heart disease; Conventional puncture method; The saphenous vein; Ultrasound-assisted technique
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33906601 PMCID: PMC8077689 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01349-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Anesthesiol ISSN: 1471-2253 Impact factor: 2.217
The grading criteria of saphenous vein punctures
| I Visible bilateral saphenous veins, no difficulty in puncture | |
| II Only a saphenous vein visible, predictable difficult access | |
| III No visible or palpable bilateral saphenous veins |
Fig. 1Legend of ultrasonic measurement of depth and width of a saphenous vein, symbol 1 is the width; symbol 2 is the depth
Fig. 2A flowchart of participants’ selection and allocation to study arms, no patients were dropped out of the study
Cardiac anomaly of patients enrolled
| Cardiac anatomy | Count (n) |
|---|---|
| Cyanotic heart disease | |
| Tetralogy of Fallot | 59 |
| Pulmonary stenosis | 12 |
| Pulmonary atresia | 1 |
| Total | 72 |
| Acyanotic heart disease | |
| Ventricular septal defect (VSD) | 34 |
| Atrial septal defect (ASD) | 7 |
| Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) | 1 |
| Mixed type (including VSD、ASD or PDA) | 30 |
| Total | 72 |
Baseline characteristics of study participants assigned to the ultrasound-assisted or the conventional puncture group to peripheral intravenous catheterization
| ultrasound-assisted group | . conventional puncture group | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (month) | 7(5–9) | 7(4–9) | 0.445 |
| Sex (male/female) | 48/24 | 43/29 | 0.449 |
| BMI (kg/cm2) | 16.31 | 16..56 | 0.186 |
| Previous history of difficult access, %(Y/N) | 15.3%(11/61) | 16.7%(12/60) | 0.803 |
| Comorbidity, %(Y/N) | 13.9%(10/62) | 5.6%(4/68) | 0.114 |
| Venous grading(I/II/III) | 5/13/54 | 4/11/57 | 0.509 |
BMI body mass index
Success rate of the first attempt in the ultrasound-assisted group versus conventional puncture group
| ultrasound-assisted | Conventional puncture group | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total(n) | 72 | 72 | |
| Success on first attempt (n) | 45 | 27 | 0.017 |
| %(95% CI) | 61.4(50.7, 73.3) | 38.6(26.3, 48.7) | |
| Rate difference, %(95% CI) | 24.5(8.6, 40.4) | – | |
| Relative risk, (95% CI) | 1.547(1.072, 2.235) | 0.640(0.436, 0.939) | |
| Cyanosis(n) | 36 | 36 | |
| Success on first attempt (n) | 24 | 12 | 0.035 |
| %(95% CI) | 66.7(51.3, 82.1) | 33.3(17.9, 48.7) | |
| Rate difference, %(95% CI) | 33.3(11.6, 55.1) | – | |
| Relative risk, (95% CI) | 1.714(1.042, 2.820) | 0.545(0.293, 1.017) | |
| Acyanosis(n) | 36 | 36 | |
| Success on first attempt (n) | 21 | 15 | 0.194 |
| %(95% CI) | 57.6(42.2, 74.4) | 42.4(25.6, 57.8) | |
| Rate difference, %(95% CI) | 16.7(−6.1, 39.4) | – | |
| Relative risk, (95% CI) | 1.413(0.823, 2.428) | 0.716(0.432, 1.187) |
CI confidence interval
The secondary outcomes in the ultrasound-assisted group versus conventional puncture group
| ultrasound-assisted group | conventional puncture group | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The overall proportion of success rate(n), % | 65(90.3%) | 56(77.8%) | 0.080 |
| Rate difference, %(95% CI) | 12.5(0.7, 24.3) | – | |
| The overall time to cannulation(s) | 45.5(36, 96.25) | 94.0(56, 171) | 0.00 |
| The time to cannulation at the first attempt(s) | 41.0(35, 53.75) | 60(45, 83) | 0.00 |
| Overall puncture numbers | 1(1, 2) | 2(1, 3) | 0.002 |
| Overall numbers of needle redirections | 3(1, 7) | 7(3, 13) | 0.001 |
| Needle redirections at the first attempt | 2(1, 5) | 3(2, 6) | 0.027 |
| The width of saphenous veins (mm) | 1.485 | 1.543 | 0.375 |
| The depth of saphenous veins (mm) | 3.622 | 3.605 | 0.949 |
| Complication (n), % | 3(4.27%) | 2(2.78%) | 0.999 |
Results of the multivariate logistic regression model to examine factors associated with the success rate of the first attempt (N = 144)
| Variables | β | OR(95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Puncture method | 0.152 | ||
| Ultrasound-assisted | 0.683 | 1.979 (0.778, 5.034) | |
| Conventional puncture | Reference | Reference | |
| Age | 0.132 | 1.141(1.010, 1.290) | 0.034 |
| Venous grading | 0.582 | ||
| I-II | 0.346 | 1.414 (0.412, 4.853) | |
| III | Reference | Reference | |
| Needle redirections at the first attempt | −0.359 | 0.698 (0.528, 0.923) | 0.012 |
| The time to cannulation at the first attempt | −0.013 | 0.987 (0.962, 1.012) | 0.301 |
| The width of the saphenous veins | 0.167 | 1.181 (1.023, 1.364) | 0.023 |
| Constant | −1.913 | 0.148 | 0.130 |
Fig. 3Forest plot of multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrating independent factors associated with the success rate of the first attempts. Hosmer and Lemeshow P = 0.682
Fig. 4ROC curve for the multivariate logistic regression model. AUC:The area under the curve; AUC = 0.889, P < 0.001, The sensitivity and specificity are 70.5 and 86.2%, respectively