Christine S M Lau1,2, Ronald S Chamberlain1,2,3. 1. Department of Surgery, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey. 2. Saint George's University School of Medicine, True Blue, Grenada. 3. Department of Surgery, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Real-time ultrasound (US) guidance for central venous catheter (CVC) insertion has been shown to increase cannulation success rates and reduce complications in adults. Literature regarding US-guided CVC placement in children remains limited and conflicting. This meta-analysis examines the efficacy and safety of US-guided CVC placement among pediatric patients. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of all published randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the use of real-time US-guided CVC insertion with anatomic landmark (LM)-guided CVC insertion in pediatric patients <18 y of age was conducted. Outcomes analyzed were cannulation success rate, number of attempts required, incidence of accidental arterial puncture, and time to cannulation. RESULTS: Eight RCTs involving 760 patients were analyzed. US-guided CVC insertion significantly increased success rates by 31.8% and decreased the mean number of attempts required. A trend toward a decrease in the risk of accidental arterial puncture with the use of US-guided CVC insertion was also observed. US-guided CVC insertion was not associated with a significant difference in time required for CVC placement. CONCLUSION: US-guided CVC placement is associated with significantly higher success rates and decreased mean number of attempts required for cannulation. US-guided CVC insertion improves success rates, and should be utilized in pediatric patients.
BACKGROUND: Real-time ultrasound (US) guidance for central venous catheter (CVC) insertion has been shown to increase cannulation success rates and reduce complications in adults. Literature regarding US-guided CVC placement in children remains limited and conflicting. This meta-analysis examines the efficacy and safety of US-guided CVC placement among pediatric patients. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of all published randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the use of real-time US-guided CVC insertion with anatomic landmark (LM)-guided CVC insertion in pediatric patients <18 y of age was conducted. Outcomes analyzed were cannulation success rate, number of attempts required, incidence of accidental arterial puncture, and time to cannulation. RESULTS: Eight RCTs involving 760 patients were analyzed. US-guided CVC insertion significantly increased success rates by 31.8% and decreased the mean number of attempts required. A trend toward a decrease in the risk of accidental arterial puncture with the use of US-guided CVC insertion was also observed. US-guided CVC insertion was not associated with a significant difference in time required for CVC placement. CONCLUSION: US-guided CVC placement is associated with significantly higher success rates and decreased mean number of attempts required for cannulation. US-guided CVC insertion improves success rates, and should be utilized in pediatric patients.
Authors: Christopher A Troianos; Gregg S Hartman; Kathryn E Glas; Nikolaos J Skubas; Robert T Eberhardt; Jennifer D Walker; Scott T Reeves Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Se Uk Lee; Yoon Ha Joo; Ikwan Chang; Do Kyun Kim; Jung Chan Lee; Jae Yun Jung; Joong Wan Park; Young Ho Kwak Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 3.316