Literature DB >> 33906468

Treatment of Patellofemoral Chondral Lesions Using Microfractures Associated with a Chitosan Scaffold: Mid-Term Clinical and Radiological Results.

Rafael Calvo1, David Figueroa1, Francisco Figueroa1,2, Jose Bravo1, Martin Contreras1, Nicolas Zilleruelo1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and radiological results of patellofemoral osteochondral lesions treated with microfractures associated with a chitosan scaffold.
DESIGN: A retrospective observational analytical study was performed. Fifteen patients with full-thickness patellofemoral osteochondral lesions were included. Quantity and quality of the reparation cartilage was assessed with the MOCART 2.0 score on a postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and clinical outcomes were evaluated with pre- and postoperative Kujala score tests. Shapiro-Wilk test for normality was applied as well as Wilcoxon's signed rank test and Kruskal-Wallis H test for clinical scores within subjects and patella versus trochlea subgroups comparisons. Analysis of variance test was used for imaging subgroups comparison, with P < 0.05 defined as statistical significance.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 33.36 months (range 24-60 months). Postoperative Kujala scores improved an average of 19 points compared with the preoperative state (SE = 17.6; P < 0.001). No statistical difference was found through the clinical location assessment (P = 0.756), as well as the cartilage imaging assessment (P = 0.756). The mean MOCART 2.0 scale was 67.67 (range 50-85).
CONCLUSIONS: Treating full-thickness patellofemoral osteochondral lesions with microfractures associated with a chitosan scaffold proved to be effective regarding defect filling and symptomatic improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CarGel; cartilage; chitosan; osteochondral; patellofemoral

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33906468      PMCID: PMC8808950          DOI: 10.1177/19476035211011506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   3.117


  32 in total

1.  Prospective clinical and radiologic evaluation of patellofemoral matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation.

Authors:  Jay R Ebert; Michael Fallon; Anne Smith; Gregory C Janes; David J Wood
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  A prospective randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint in young athletes.

Authors:  Rimtautas Gudas; Romas J Kalesinskas; Vytautas Kimtys; Edgaras Stankevicius; Vytautas Toliusis; Giedrius Bernotavicius; Alfredas Smailys
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Clinical outcome after microfracture of the knee: a meta-analysis of before/after-data of controlled studies.

Authors:  Lukas Negrin; Florian Kutscha-Lissberg; Gerald Gartlehner; Vilmos Vecsei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Is microfracture of chondral defects in the knee associated with different results in patients aged 40 years or younger?

Authors:  Peter C Kreuz; Christoph Erggelet; Matthias R Steinwachs; Stefanie J Krause; Andreas Lahm; Philipp Niemeyer; Nadir Ghanem; Markus Uhl; Norbert Südkamp
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Novel scaffold-based BST-CarGel treatment results in superior cartilage repair compared with microfracture in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  William D Stanish; Robert McCormack; Francisco Forriol; Nicholas Mohtadi; Stéphane Pelet; Jacques Desnoyers; Alberto Restrepo; Matthew S Shive
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Microfracture: indications, technique, and results.

Authors:  Riley J Williams; Heather W Harnly
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2007

Review 7.  Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis.

Authors:  Kai Mithoefer; Timothy McAdams; Riley J Williams; Peter C Kreuz; Bert R Mandelbaum
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  BST-CarGel® Treatment Maintains Cartilage Repair Superiority over Microfracture at 5 Years in a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Matthew S Shive; William D Stanish; Robert McCormack; Francisco Forriol; Nicholas Mohtadi; Stéphane Pelet; Jacques Desnoyers; Stéphane Méthot; Kendra Vehik; Alberto Restrepo
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  High-Grade Patellar Chondral Defects: Promising Results From Management With Osteochondral Autografts.

Authors:  David Figueroa; Rafael Calvo Rodriguez; Rodrigo Donoso; Jaime Espinoza; Alex Vaisman; Claudio Yañez
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-07-15

10.  The MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 Knee Score and Atlas.

Authors:  Markus M Schreiner; Marcus Raudner; Stefan Marlovits; Klaus Bohndorf; Michael Weber; Martin Zalaudek; Sebastian Röhrich; Pavol Szomolanyi; Giuseppe Filardo; Reinhard Windhager; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  2 in total

1.  Chitosan based scaffold applied in patellar cartilage lesions showed positive clinical and MRI results at minimum 2 years of follow up.

Authors:  Alberto Poggi; Alessandro Di Martino; Luca Andriolo; Davide Reale; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Patellar Microfracture: Internal Stabilization House-on-Stilts Technique to Achieve Better Results.

Authors:  Christopher Chun Hei Yip; Daniel Kwok Hing Yip
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-03-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.