PURPOSE: Age-dependent studies about the clinical result after microfracture of cartilage lesions in the knee are still missing. This prospective study was performed to discover age-dependent differences in the results after microfracture over a period of 36 months. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2002, 85 patients (mean age, 39 years) with full-thickness chondral lesions underwent the microfracture procedure and were evaluated preoperatively and at 6, 18, and 36 months after surgery. Depending on the patients' age (< or =40 years or >40 years) and the localization of the defects (femoral condyles, tibia, and patellofemoral joint), the patients were assigned to 6 different groups. Exclusion criteria were meniscal pathologic conditions, tibiofemoral malalignment, and ligament instabilities. Baseline clinical scores were compared with follow-up data by use of paired Wilcoxon tests for the modified Cincinnati knee score and the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score. RESULTS: The scores improved in all groups over the whole study period (P < .05). Patients aged 40 years or younger had significantly better results (P < .01) for both scores compared with older patients. Between 18 and 36 months after microfracture, the ICRS score deteriorated significantly (P < .05) in patients aged over 40 years whereas younger patients with defects on the femoral condyles and on the tibia showed neither a significant improvement nor a significant deterioration in the ICRS score (P > .1). Magnetic resonance imaging 36 months after surgery revealed better defect filling and a better overall score in younger patients (P < .05). The Spearman coefficient of correlation between clinical and magnetic resonance imaging scores was 0.84. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results after microfracture of full-thickness cartilage lesions in the knee are age-dependent. Deterioration begins 18 months after surgery and is significantly pronounced in patients aged older than 40 years. The best prognostic factor was found to be a patient age of 40 or younger with defects on the femoral condyles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic case series.
PURPOSE: Age-dependent studies about the clinical result after microfracture of cartilage lesions in the knee are still missing. This prospective study was performed to discover age-dependent differences in the results after microfracture over a period of 36 months. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2002, 85 patients (mean age, 39 years) with full-thickness chondral lesions underwent the microfracture procedure and were evaluated preoperatively and at 6, 18, and 36 months after surgery. Depending on the patients' age (< or =40 years or >40 years) and the localization of the defects (femoral condyles, tibia, and patellofemoral joint), the patients were assigned to 6 different groups. Exclusion criteria were meniscal pathologic conditions, tibiofemoral malalignment, and ligament instabilities. Baseline clinical scores were compared with follow-up data by use of paired Wilcoxon tests for the modified Cincinnati knee score and the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score. RESULTS: The scores improved in all groups over the whole study period (P < .05). Patients aged 40 years or younger had significantly better results (P < .01) for both scores compared with older patients. Between 18 and 36 months after microfracture, the ICRS score deteriorated significantly (P < .05) in patients aged over 40 years whereas younger patients with defects on the femoral condyles and on the tibia showed neither a significant improvement nor a significant deterioration in the ICRS score (P > .1). Magnetic resonance imaging 36 months after surgery revealed better defect filling and a better overall score in younger patients (P < .05). The Spearman coefficient of correlation between clinical and magnetic resonance imaging scores was 0.84. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results after microfracture of full-thickness cartilage lesions in the knee are age-dependent. Deterioration begins 18 months after surgery and is significantly pronounced in patients aged older than 40 years. The best prognostic factor was found to be a patient age of 40 or younger with defects on the femoral condyles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic case series.
Authors: Peter Bollars; Marc Bosquet; Bruno Vandekerckhove; François Hardeman; Johan Bellemans Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-11-11 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: A H Gomoll; G Filardo; L de Girolamo; J Espregueira-Mendes; J Esprequeira-Mendes; M Marcacci; W G Rodkey; J R Steadman; R J Steadman; S Zaffagnini; E Kon Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Artur Kroell; Paul Marks; Jaskarndip Chahal; Mark Hurtig; Tim Dwyer; Daniel Whelan; John Theodoropoulos Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Ryan M Degen; Nathan W Coleman; Danielle Tetreault; Brenda Chang; Greg T Mahony; Christopher L Camp; Shawn G Anthony; Riley J Williams Journal: Cartilage Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Kevin R Stone; Jonathan R Pelsis; Kellen Na; Ann W Walgenbach; Thomas J Turek Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Matthew T Wolf; Hong Zhang; Blanka Sharma; Norman A Marcus; Uwe Pietzner; Stefan Fickert; Achim Lueth; G H Robert Albers; Jennifer H Elisseeff Journal: Cartilage Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 4.634