Literature DB >> 33905968

The aversion positivity: Mediofrontal cortical potentials reflect parametric aversive prediction errors and drive behavioral modification following negative reinforcement.

Eric Rawls1, Connie Lamm2.   

Abstract

Reinforcement learning capitalizes on prediction errors (PEs), representing the deviation of received outcomes from expected outcomes. Mediofrontal event-related potentials (ERPs), in particular the feedback-related negativity (FRN)/reward positivity (RewP), are related to PE signaling, but there is disagreement as to whether the FRN/RewP encode signed or unsigned PEs. PE encoding can potentially be dissected by time-frequency analysis, as frontal theta [4-8 Hz] might represent poor outcomes, while central delta [1-3 Hz] might instead represent rewarding outcomes. However, cortical PE signaling in negative reinforcement is still poorly understood, and the role of cortical PE representations in behavioral reinforcement learning following negative reinforcement is relatively unexplored. We recorded EEG while participants completed a task with matched positive and negative reinforcement outcome modalities, with parametrically manipulated single-trial outcomes producing positive and negative PEs. We first demonstrated that PEs systematically influence future behavior in both positive and negative reinforcement conditions. In negative reinforcement conditions, mediofrontal ERPs positively signaled unsigned PEs in a time window encompassing the P2 potential, and negatively signaled signed PEs for a time window encompassing the FRN/RewP and frontal P3 (an "aversion positivity"). Central delta power increased parametrically with increasingly aversive outcomes, contributing to the "aversion positivity". Finally, negative reinforcement ERPs correlated with RTs on the following trial, suggesting cortical PEs guide behavioral adaptations. Positive reinforcement PEs did not influence ERP or time-frequency activity, despite significant behavioral effects. These results demonstrate that mediofrontal PE signals are a mechanism underlying negative reinforcement learning, and that delta power increases for aversive outcomes might contribute to the "aversion positivity."
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feedback-related negativity (FRN); Negative reinforcement; Prediction error; Reinforcement learning; Reward positivity (RewP); Salience; Signed; Unsigned; Value

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33905968      PMCID: PMC8169579          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.644


  53 in total

1.  Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection.

Authors:  W H Miltner; C H Braun; M G Coles
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale.

Authors:  J H Patton; M S Stanford; E S Barratt
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1995-11

4.  Medial frontal cortex response to unexpected motivationally salient outcomes.

Authors:  Heather E Soder; Geoffrey F Potts
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment.

Authors:  K O Fagerström
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Reward Prediction Error Modulates Saccade Vigor.

Authors:  Ehsan Sedaghat-Nejad; David J Herzfeld; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II.

Authors:  J B Saunders; O G Aasland; T F Babor; J R de la Fuente; M Grant
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  The feedback-related negativity (FRN) revisited: new insights into the localization, meaning and network organization.

Authors:  Tobias U Hauser; Reto Iannaccone; Philipp Stämpfli; Renate Drechsler; Daniel Brandeis; Susanne Walitza; Silvia Brem
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Cyril R Pernet; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  4 in total

1.  Win, lose, or draw: Examining salience, reward memory, and depression with the reward positivity.

Authors:  Nathan M Hager; Matt R Judah; Eric Rawls
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Negative urgency as a risk factor for hazardous alcohol use: Dual influences of cognitive control and reinforcement processing.

Authors:  Eric Rawls; Noah R Wolkowicz; Lindsay S Ham; Connie Lamm
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.054

3.  Can Social Norms Promote Recycled Water Use on Campus? The Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Xiaojun Liu; Shiqi Chen; Xiaotong Guo; Hanliang Fu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-04

4.  Frontal midline theta differentiates separate cognitive control strategies while still generalizing the need for cognitive control.

Authors:  Jarrod Eisma; Eric Rawls; Stephanie Long; Russell Mach; Connie Lamm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.