Literature DB >> 34454939

Negative urgency as a risk factor for hazardous alcohol use: Dual influences of cognitive control and reinforcement processing.

Eric Rawls1, Noah R Wolkowicz2, Lindsay S Ham3, Connie Lamm3.   

Abstract

Negative Urgency (NU) is a prominent risk factor for hazardous alcohol use. While research has helped elucidate how NU relates to neurobiological functioning with respect to alcohol use, no known work has contextualized such functioning within existing neurobiological theories in addiction. Therefore, we elucidated mechanisms contributing to the NU-hazardous alcohol use relationship by combining NU theories with neurobiological dual models of addiction, which posit addiction is related to cognitive control and reinforcement processing. Fifty-five undergraduates self-reported NU and hazardous alcohol use. We recorded EEG while participants performed a reinforced flanker task. We measured cognitive control using N2 activation time-locked to the incongruent flanker stimulus, and we measured reinforcement processing using the feedback-related negativity (FRN) time-locked to better-than-expected negative reinforcement feedback. We modeled hazardous drinking using hierarchical regression, with NU, N2, and FRN plus their interactions as predictors. The regression model significantly predicted hazardous alcohol use, and the three-way interaction (NU × N2 × FRN) significantly improved model fit. In the context of inefficient processing (i.e., larger N2s and FRNs), NU demonstrated a strong relationship with hazardous alcohol use. In the context of efficient processing (i.e., smaller N2s and FRNs), NU was unrelated to hazardous alcohol use. Control analyses ruled out the potential impact of other impulsivity subscales, individual differences in dimensional negative affect or anxiety, and use of substances other than alcohol, and post hoc specificity analyses showed that this effect was driven primarily by heavy drinking, rather than frequency of drinking. This analysis provides preliminary evidence that brain mechanisms of cognitive control and reinforcement processing influence the relationship between NU and hazardous alcohol use, and confirms a specific influence of negative reinforcement processing. Future clinical research could leverage these neurobiological moderators for substance misuse treatment.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol; Cognitive control; Dual model; Event-related potential; Negative urgency; Reinforcement processing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34454939      PMCID: PMC8488007          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.054


  89 in total

1.  The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.

Authors:  Lisa M Jonkman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 2.  The costs and benefits of brain dopamine for cognitive control.

Authors:  Roshan Cools
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-08-09

3.  Medial frontal cortex response to unexpected motivationally salient outcomes.

Authors:  Heather E Soder; Geoffrey F Potts
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Projection-specific modulation of dopamine neuron synapses by aversive and rewarding stimuli.

Authors:  Stephan Lammel; Daniela I Ion; Jochen Roeper; Robert C Malenka
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  The role of negative urgency and expectancies in problem drinking and disordered eating: testing a model of comorbidity in pathological and at-risk samples.

Authors:  Sarah Fischer; Regan Settles; Brittany Collins; Rachel Gunn; Gregory T Smith
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2011-05-23

6.  Negative urgency, mood induction, and alcohol seeking behaviors.

Authors:  J Davis VanderVeen; Martin H Plawecki; James B Millward; James Hays; David A Kareken; Sean O'Connor; Melissa A Cyders
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Does drinking to cope explain links between emotion-driven impulse control difficulties and hazardous drinking? A longitudinal test.

Authors:  Laura E Watkins; Molly R Franz; David DiLillo; Kim L Gratz; Terri L Messman-Moore
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2015-10-26

8.  The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  fMRI Neurofeedback Training for Increasing Anterior Cingulate Cortex Activation in Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. An Exploratory Randomized, Single-Blinded Study.

Authors:  Anna Zilverstand; Bettina Sorger; Dorine Slaats-Willemse; Cornelis C Kan; Rainer Goebel; Jan K Buitelaar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Efficacy of brief alcohol screening intervention for college students (BASICS): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Alexandre Fachini; Poliana P Aliane; Edson Z Martinez; Erikson F Furtado
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2012-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.