Literature DB >> 33904312

What Markov State Models Can and Cannot Do: Correlation versus Path-Based Observables in Protein-Folding Models.

Ernesto Suárez1, Rafal P Wiewiora2, Chris Wehmeyer3, Frank Noé3, John D Chodera2, Daniel M Zuckerman4.   

Abstract

Markov state models (MSMs) have been widely applied to study the kinetics and pathways of protein conformational dynamics based on statistical analysis of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. These MSMs coarse-grain both configuration space and time in ways that limit what kinds of observables they can reproduce with high fidelity over different spatial and temporal resolutions. Despite their popularity, there is still limited understanding of which biophysical observables can be computed from these MSMs in a robust and unbiased manner, and which suffer from the space-time coarse-graining intrinsic in the MSM model. Most theoretical arguments and practical validity tests for MSMs rely on long-time equilibrium kinetics, such as the slowest relaxation time scales and experimentally observable time-correlation functions. Here, we perform an extensive assessment of the ability of well-validated protein folding MSMs to accurately reproduce path-based observable such as mean first-passage times (MFPTs) and transition path mechanisms compared to a direct trajectory analysis. We also assess a recently proposed class of history-augmented MSMs (haMSMs) that exploit additional information not accounted for in standard MSMs. We conclude with some practical guidance on the use of MSMs to study various problems in conformational dynamics of biomolecules. In brief, MSMs can accurately reproduce correlation functions slower than the lag time, but path-based observables can only be reliably reproduced if the lifetimes of states exceed the lag time, which is a much stricter requirement. Even in the presence of short-lived states, we find that haMSMs reproduce path-based observables more reliably.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33904312      PMCID: PMC8127341          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  53 in total

1.  How fast-folding proteins fold.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Variational Approach to Molecular Kinetics.

Authors:  Feliks Nüske; Bettina G Keller; Guillermo Pérez-Hernández; Antonia S J S Mey; Frank Noé
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Automatic discovery of metastable states for the construction of Markov models of macromolecular conformational dynamics.

Authors:  John D Chodera; Nina Singhal; Vijay S Pande; Ken A Dill; William C Swope
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-04-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  How long does it take to equilibrate the unfolded state of a protein?

Authors:  Ronald M Levy; Wei Dai; Nan-Jie Deng; Dmitrii E Makarov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Markov state models based on milestoning.

Authors:  Christof Schütte; Frank Noé; Jianfeng Lu; Marco Sarich; Eric Vanden-Eijnden
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Estimating first-passage time distributions from weighted ensemble simulations and non-Markovian analyses.

Authors:  Ernesto Suárez; Adam J Pratt; Lillian T Chong; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Exact milestoning.

Authors:  Juan M Bello-Rivas; Ron Elber
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  GPU-accelerated molecular modeling coming of age.

Authors:  John E Stone; David J Hardy; Ivan S Ufimtsev; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.518

9.  Enhanced modeling via network theory: Adaptive sampling of Markov state models.

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Daniel L Ensign; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 10.  Everything you wanted to know about Markov State Models but were afraid to ask.

Authors:  Vijay S Pande; Kyle Beauchamp; Gregory R Bowman
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.608

View more
  5 in total

1.  Estimation of binding rates and affinities from multiensemble Markov models and ligand decoupling.

Authors:  Yunhui Ge; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Variational embedding of protein folding simulations using Gaussian mixture variational autoencoders.

Authors:  Mahdi Ghorbani; Samarjeet Prasad; Jeffery B Klauda; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Enhanced-Sampling Simulations for the Estimation of Ligand Binding Kinetics: Current Status and Perspective.

Authors:  Katya Ahmad; Andrea Rizzi; Riccardo Capelli; Davide Mandelli; Wenping Lyu; Paolo Carloni
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-06-08

4.  A Small Molecule Stabilizes the Disordered Native State of the Alzheimer's Aβ Peptide.

Authors:  Thomas Löhr; Kai Kohlhoff; Gabriella T Heller; Carlo Camilloni; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.780

5.  The Next Frontier for Designing Switchable Proteins: Rational Enhancement of Kinetics.

Authors:  Anthony T Bogetti; Maria F Presti; Stewart N Loh; Lillian T Chong
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.991

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.