Literature DB >> 26131764

Estimating first-passage time distributions from weighted ensemble simulations and non-Markovian analyses.

Ernesto Suárez1, Adam J Pratt2, Lillian T Chong2, Daniel M Zuckerman1.   

Abstract

First-passage times (FPTs) are widely used to characterize stochastic processes such as chemical reactions, protein folding, diffusion processes or triggering a stock option. In previous work (Suarez et al., JCTC 2014;10:2658-2667), we demonstrated a non-Markovian analysis approach that, with a sufficient subset of history information, yields unbiased mean first-passage times from weighted-ensemble (WE) simulations. The estimation of the distribution of the first-passage times is, however, a more ambitious goal since it cannot be obtained by direct observation in WE trajectories. Likewise, a large number of events would be required to make a good estimation of the distribution from a regular "brute force" simulation. Here, we show how the previously developed non-Markovian analysis can generate approximate, but highly accurate, FPT distributions from WE data. The analysis can also be applied to any other unbiased trajectories, such as from standard molecular dynamics simulations. The present study employs a range of systems with independent verification of the distributions to demonstrate the success and limitations of the approach. By comparison to a standard Markov analysis, the non-Markovian approach is less sensitive to the user-defined discretization of configuration space.
© 2015 The Protein Society.

Keywords:  first-passage time; non-Markovian; rare event; weighted ensemble

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26131764      PMCID: PMC4815309          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  41 in total

1.  Fast-folding protein kinetics, hidden intermediates, and the sequential stabilization model.

Authors:  S Banu Ozkan; Ken A Dill; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Computing time scales from reaction coordinates by milestoning.

Authors:  Anton K Faradjian; Ron Elber
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  How fast-folding proteins fold.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

5.  Umbrella sampling for nonequilibrium processes.

Authors:  Aryeh Warmflash; Prabhakar Bhimalapuram; Aaron R Dinner
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Using generalized ensemble simulations and Markov state models to identify conformational states.

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Xuhui Huang; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 3.608

7.  Weighted-ensemble Brownian dynamics simulations for protein association reactions.

Authors:  G A Huber; S Kim
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Emergence of glass-like behavior in Markov state models of protein folding dynamics.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Weber; Robert L Jack; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 9.  Everything you wanted to know about Markov State Models but were afraid to ask.

Authors:  Vijay S Pande; Kyle Beauchamp; Gregory R Bowman
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.608

View more
  8 in total

1.  Statistical Uncertainty Analysis for Small-Sample, High Log-Variance Data: Cautions for Bootstrapping and Bayesian Bootstrapping.

Authors:  Barmak Mostofian; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Computational Estimation of Microsecond to Second Atomistic Folding Times.

Authors:  Upendra Adhikari; Barmak Mostofian; Jeremy Copperman; Sundar Raman Subramanian; Andrew A Petersen; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  Weighted Ensemble Simulation: Review of Methodology, Applications, and Software.

Authors:  Daniel M Zuckerman; Lillian T Chong
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 12.981

4.  Na+-binding modes involved in thrombin's allosteric response as revealed by molecular dynamics simulations, correlation networks and Markov modeling.

Authors:  Jiajie Xiao; Freddie R Salsbury
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  What Markov State Models Can and Cannot Do: Correlation versus Path-Based Observables in Protein-Folding Models.

Authors:  Ernesto Suárez; Rafal P Wiewiora; Chris Wehmeyer; Frank Noé; John D Chodera; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  WESTPA 2.0: High-Performance Upgrades for Weighted Ensemble Simulations and Analysis of Longer-Timescale Applications.

Authors:  John D Russo; She Zhang; Jeremy M G Leung; Anthony T Bogetti; Jeff P Thompson; Alex J DeGrave; Paul A Torrillo; A J Pratt; Kim F Wong; Junchao Xia; Jeremy Copperman; Joshua L Adelman; Matthew C Zwier; David N LeBard; Daniel M Zuckerman; Lillian T Chong
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Accurate Estimation of Protein Folding and Unfolding Times: Beyond Markov State Models.

Authors:  Ernesto Suárez; Joshua L Adelman; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Non-Markov-Type Analysis and Diffusion Map Analysis for Molecular Dynamics Trajectory of Chignolin at a High Temperature.

Authors:  Hiroshi Fujisaki; Hiromichi Suetani; Luca Maragliano; Ayori Mitsutake
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.